Jonas Meurer:
> Am 17.10.18 um 12:00 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
>> On Oct 17, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>>> yes, but when using your repo one has to add your key to the keys apt
>>> trusts, and this is something completly different than using proper
>>> backports.
>> Well... I trust much more Ondrej's ar
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I don't have time working on this program, so I ask for a adopter.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I don't have time working on this program, so I ask for a adopter.
--
Liang Guo
http://guoliang.me/
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I don't have time working on this program, so I ask for a adopter.
--
Liang Guo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I don't have time working on this program, so I ask for a adopter.
--
Liang Guo
http://guoliang.me/
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:30 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> As long as people choose to strip of dependencies to libsystemd from
> packages like util-linux, avoiding a fork would not work with how Debian
> and Debian based distributions are built.
It might be feasible to introduce nosystemd build
Hello, I managed to strace init and it seems more interesting while it
is trying to sleep. At a certain point, everything gives ENOSYS
(Function not implemented) errors.
https://pastebin.com/WtGQvL1x
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Whenever my computer goes to sleep, either through closing the laptop or
calling systemctl suspend/hibernate, it does not start again and the
computer must be hard reset. I have been having this problem for
several weeks, after a fairly large
On Wed 17/Oct/2018 23:06:24 +0200 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> You say "more than adequate". I don't particularly see it as providing a
>> solid system as you don't get restart on failure. Now I can see how
>> people say that this is not a problem as daemons should not crash in the
>> first place. Maybe
Bastian Blank - 19.10.18, 12:25:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > So Devuan almost doubles the percentage of sysvinit-core
> > installations.
> Devuan is _not_ Debian. They forked it, with the full knowledge that
> they might have to do all the work to sup
Holger Levsen - 19.10.18, 12:02:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
>
> It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to
> maintain it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter
> how many people
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> So Devuan almost doubles the percentage of sysvinit-core installations.
Devuan is _not_ Debian. They forked it, with the full knowledge that
they might have to do all the work to support their choices. They had
the chance to
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:35 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Martin Steigerwald - 19.10.18, 10:57:
> > That written, I estimate or guess that the people preferring to use
> > another initialization system than the initialization system in
> > Systemd are in the minority. Yet, this minority might
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to maintain
it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter how many people
are using it :)
*Someone* needs to do the
Martin Steigerwald - 19.10.18, 10:57:
> That written, I estimate or guess that the people preferring to use
> another initialization system than the initialization system in
> Systemd are in the minority. Yet, this minority might be larger than
> you think. Especially as popularity contest does not
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 19/10/18 a les 09:37, Philipp Kern ha escrit:
> On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia wro
dropping debian-hurd
Bernd Zeimetz - 18.10.18, 22:07:
> - the typical package maintainer won't test initscripts
I am not typical then.
> After using a lot of systemd now I will never go back to init scripts.
> Systemd comes with a steep learning curve, but one you've stated
> using its features
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 09:37 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> > El 18/10/18 a les 22:07, Bernd Zeimetz ha escrit:
> > > For my packages I can state that I do not have a single machine
> > > which is not using systemd - and to be honest - I won't waste my
> > >
That’s interesting though - could we use GNU shepherd to:
a) support kFreeBSD?
b) automatically translate systemd units to sheep(?) (limited subset might work)
The other alternative is OpenRC - here’s the same question - could we have
systemd units as authoritative definition and have OpenRC tra
On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
El 18/10/18 a les 22:07, Bernd Zeimetz ha escrit:
For my packages I can state that I do not have a single machine which
is
not using systemd - and to be honest - I won't waste my time in
writing/debugging initscripts.
Most of people want to use a GNU o
20 matches
Mail list logo
