Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14602 March 1977, Vincent Danjean wrote: >> That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some >> extra DNS records. And DMARC then allow to tell other mail servers (that >> follow DMARC) to get rid (spamfilter) mail that aren't from what your >> DNS says it should be from (or

Re: Non-free RFCs in stretch

2017-03-05 Thread Josh Triplett
Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2017-03-05 12:41:18, Ben Finney wrote: > > Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes: > > > I'd like to see a compromise in the DFSG like #4 for standards to > > > allow their inclusion in Debian when their license at least allows > > > modification when changing the name or namespace fo

Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Christopher Clements
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 09:55:14AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: Christopher Clements writes: On closer examination, I think you are correct in saying that the replies are written by the spammer as well. On closer examination of what? The "To:" field. The headers of the mail you're apparentl

Re: Non-free RFCs in stretch

2017-03-05 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2017-03-05 12:41:18, Ben Finney wrote: > Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes: > > I'd like to see a compromise in the DFSG like #4 for standards to > > allow their inclusion in Debian when their license at least allows > > modification when changing the name or namespace for schemas and the > > like.

Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 5, 2017 3:08:49 PM EST, Vincent Danjean wrote: >Le 05/03/2017 à 16:29, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : >> That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some >> extra DNS records. And DMARC then allow to tell other mail servers >(that >> follow DMARC) to get rid (spamfilter) ma

Bug#856888: ITP: django-dirtyfields -- package for tracking dirty fields on a Django model instance

2017-03-05 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christopher Hoskin * Package name: django-dirtyfields Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : Romain Garrigues * URL : https://github.com/romgar/django-dirtyfields * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description :

Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 05/03/2017 à 16:29, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some > extra DNS records. And DMARC then allow to tell other mail servers (that > follow DMARC) to get rid (spamfilter) mail that aren't from what your > DNS says it should be from (or a

Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14602 March 1977, Philip Hands wrote: > I guess we could help the mail servers of the recipients of the initial > messages make that decision if we did SPF for debian.org, but I guess > that the lack of SPF probably indicates that this is very hard to do > with our distributed setup. With the

Re: Non-free RFCs in stretch

2017-03-05 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 4 mars 2017 10:13:21 GMT+01:00, Simon Josefsson a écrit : >Hi all, > >I have searched for non-free licensed IETF RFCs in the archive and >found >the files below in the stretch suite. Compare earlier work here [1]. > >I know this is late in the release cycle, but I believe these are real >RC

Re: SPAM

2017-03-05 Thread Philip Hands
Christopher Clements writes: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 12:42:50PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: >>Christopher Clements writes: >> >>> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:36:58PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: >>> >I think the best explanation is that the entire message ??? complaint and >>> >quoted part ??? were co