Le 4 mars 2017 10:13:21 GMT+01:00, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> a écrit : >Hi all, > >I have searched for non-free licensed IETF RFCs in the archive and >found >the files below in the stretch suite. Compare earlier work here [1]. > >I know this is late in the release cycle, but I believe these are real >RC bugs so it appears to me that bug reports should be filed. I post >this here first to confirm my understanding that this is the >appropriate >way to act. If some policy has changed that makes this not a problem >anymore, let me know. I'm okay to file these bugs as stretch-ignore to >not uphold the release, if that makes the release team happier. I wish >I had looked earlier, but it seems an imminent release triggers various >old habbits. > >One interesting aspect is that almost all of the RFCs below are the >zlib >RFC1950-RFC1952 documents. They contain this clause: > > Copyright (c) 1996 L. Peter Deutsch and Jean-Loup Gailly > > Permission is granted to copy and distribute this document for any > purpose and without charge, including translations into other > languages and incorporation into compilations, provided that the > copyright notice and this notice are preserved, and that any > substantive changes or deletions from the original are clearly > marked. > >This does not clearly grant the right to modify the document and >redistribute the result. Further, I believe the IETF Trust claim >copyright on all RFCs, even older documents, so the content of the RFC >itself may not be the entire story. It might be wortwhile to reach out >to the authors to see if they can publish the documents under a clear >and DFSG-compatible license. I don't have time for this though, >volunteers welcome. > >pkg binutils ver 2.27.90.20170124 > binutils-2.27.90.20170124/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > binutils-2.27.90.20170124/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > binutils-2.27.90.20170124/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > >pkg binutils-avr ver 2.26.20160125+Atmel3.5.3-1 > binutils/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > binutils/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > binutils/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > >pkg cargo ver 0.15.0~dev-1 > deps/libz-sys-1.0.7/src/zlib-1.2.8/doc/rfc1950.txt > deps/libz-sys-1.0.7/src/zlib-1.2.8/doc/rfc1952.txt > deps/libz-sys-1.0.7/src/zlib-1.2.8/doc/rfc1951.txt > >pkg critcl ver 3.1.9-1 > critcl-3.1.9/examples/zlibwrap/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > critcl-3.1.9/examples/zlibwrap/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > critcl-3.1.9/examples/zlibwrap/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > >pkg fossil ver 1:1.37-1 > Fossil_2017-01-16_205854_1669115ab9/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > Fossil_2017-01-16_205854_1669115ab9/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > Fossil_2017-01-16_205854_1669115ab9/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > >pkg inspircd ver 2.0.23-2 > inspircd-2.0.23/docs/rfc/rfc1035.txt > inspircd-2.0.23/docs/rfc/rfc1413.txt > inspircd-2.0.23/docs/rfc/rfc1459.txt > >pkg povray ver 1:3.7.0.0-9 > povray-3.7.0.0/libraries/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > povray-3.7.0.0/libraries/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > povray-3.7.0.0/libraries/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > >pkg tcl8.6 ver 8.6.6+dfsg-1 > tcl8.6.6/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1950.txt > tcl8.6.6/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1951.txt > tcl8.6.6/compat/zlib/doc/rfc1952.txt > >Cheers, >/Simon
Could you check if lintian found this problems. If not could you fill a bug. If yes could you fill a bug against fptmaster for adding to autoreject list ? Bastien > >[1] https://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
