[ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

2016-07-28 Thread Josh Triplett
I'd like to announce a project I've been working on for a while: git-series provides a tool for managing patch series with git, tracking the "history of history". git series tracks changes to the patch series over time, including rebases and other non-fast-forwarding changes. git series also track

Bug#832806: ITP: ignition-common -- Ignition common classes and functions for robot apps

2016-07-28 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jose Luis Rivero * Package name: ignition-common Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : jriv...@osrfoundation.org * URL : https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-common * License : Apache2 Programming Lang: C++ Descript

Work-needing packages report for Jul 29, 2016

2016-07-28 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 799 (new: 2) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 169 (new: 1) Total number of packages request

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

2016-07-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Pirate, On 28 July 2016 at 03:40, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi all, > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > controversial alternative pagure. Actually, this is quite sad. You have put a lot of effort in the GitLab packaging, but in the end had to move to an a

Re: MBF: Removing old GNOME python bindings

2016-07-28 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-07-28 23:29:00) > It is high time that we remove the old GNOME python bindings. We have > had the "new" GObject introspection support since at least Squeeze. > The old ones are completely unmaintained and unsupported. > > I'd like to get gnome-python, gnome-py

MBF: Removing old GNOME python bindings

2016-07-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, It is high time that we remove the old GNOME python bindings. We have had the "new" GObject introspection support since at least Squeeze. The old ones are completely unmaintained and unsupported. I'd like to get gnome-python, gnome-python-extras, pyorbit, nautilus-python and pygtksourceview r

Re: Bug#832748: ITP: greatcmakecookoff -- Usefull and less than usefull cmake recipes

2016-07-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Am 28.07.2016 um 21:19 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On Thursday 28 July 2016 20:57:30 Ole Streicher wrote: >> Hi Sune, > >> However, it is not just "works-for-me", since it is used in a different >> place from where it was developed, so the code found its friends >> (unfortunately). > > And it might e

Re: Bug#832748: ITP: greatcmakecookoff -- Usefull and less than usefull cmake recipes

2016-07-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 28 July 2016 20:57:30 Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Sune, > However, it is not just "works-for-me", since it is used in a different > place from where it was developed, so the code found its friends > (unfortunately). And it might even find more friends if available in debian. And then m

Re: Bug#832748: ITP: greatcmakecookoff -- Usefull and less than usefull cmake recipes

2016-07-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Sune, I must say that I agree with you; the code is not of very high quality, some places are especially ugly in a Debian build (automatic or forced download of external packages). However, it is not just "works-for-me", since it is used in a different place from where it was developed, so the

Re: Bug#832748: ITP: greatcmakecookoff -- Usefull and less than usefull cmake recipes

2016-07-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 28 July 2016 15:33:55 Ole Streicher wrote: > URL : https://github.com/UCL/GreatCMakeCookOff/wiki > Description : Bunch of CMake pain in the baker > This is a repository of useful and less than useful CMake recipes. After reading it thru, I would really like to ques

Re: Policy 12.3: should I rename?

2016-07-28 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Sven Bartscher > > > I am a developer and regardless of the distribution I use, I often have > > a slow internet connection. So having to download possibly large > > documentation is a problem for me. > > How do you keep up wi

Re: Policy 12.3: should I rename?

2016-07-28 Thread Sven Bartscher
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:09:36 +0200 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Sven Bartscher > > > I am a developer and regardless of the distribution I use, I often have > > a slow internet connection. So having to download possibly large > > documentation is a problem for me. "problem" may have been exag

Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 15:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 at 08:33:21 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote: > > Do you mean metapackage or virtual package?  Wouldn't a virtual > > package > > be exactly the right thing for this?  Then dbus-user-session and > > dbus-x11 would each "Provid

Bug#832757: ITP: fermi-lite -- standalone C library for assembling Illumina short reads in small regions

2016-07-28 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sascha Steinbiss * Package name: fermi-lite Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Heng Li * URL : https://github.com/lh3/fermi-lite * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Description : standalone C library for assembling

Bug#832754: ITP: adapterremoval -- rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging of gene sequences

2016-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: adapterremoval Version : 2.1.7 Upstream Author : Mikkel Schubert, Stinus Lindgreen and Ludovic Orlando * URL : https://github.com/MikkelSchubert/adapterremoval * License : GPL Programming L

Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 at 08:33:21 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Simon McVittie [160727 20:04]: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:02:32 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > Shouldn't this > > > dependency only be declared at some other level (libdbus, GDBus,...)? > > > > I think this would have to b

Bug#832748: ITP: greatcmakecookoff -- Usefull and less than usefull cmake recipes

2016-07-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ole Streicher X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: greatcmakecookoff Version : 2.1.7 Upstream Author : Mayeul d'Avezac URL : https://github.com/UCL/GreatCMakeCookOff/wiki * License : MIT Program

Re: Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:02:32 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > If the package name is changing or if we are dropping dbus-x11 in the future > > that would require modifying again quite some packages. > > I currently count 55 direct Depends and 17 Recommends on db

Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Marvin Renich
* Simon McVittie [160727 20:04]: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 18:02:32 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Shouldn't this > > dependency only be declared at some other level (libdbus, GDBus,...)? > > I think this would have to be a new dbus-session metapackage, unless > I'm missing something. dbus i

Re: Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Josh Triplett
Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 23:48:42 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I can think of another reason that this might change: if we introduce an > > (experimental, and eventually non-experimental) variant based on a > > future stable version of kdbus. > > The usual difficulties of d

Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-07-28 01:03:04 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > libdbus-1-3 shouldn't depend on a session bus, because you might only > be using it to access the system bus; Or because the user might not use the system bus at all, but the application depends on libdbus-1-3 it because it's a library and uses

Re: Proposed mass bug filing: use and misuse of dbus-launch (dbus-x11)

2016-07-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 23:48:42 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > I can think of another reason that this might change: if we introduce an > (experimental, and eventually non-experimental) variant based on a > future stable version of kdbus. The usual difficulties of depending on kernel features aside

Processed (with 10 errors): bts

2016-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 718225 -1 Bug #718225 [live-build] live-build should authenticate files it downloads Bug 718225 cloned as bug 832660 > reassign -1 open-infrastructure-system-build Bug #832660 [live-build] live-build should authenticate files it downloads Bu

Bug#832659: ITP: sopt -- Sparse optimization and sparsity averaging

2016-07-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ole Streicher X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-as...@lists.debian.org,debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: sopt Version : tbd. (currently git only) Upstream Author : Rafael Carrillo, Jason McEwen, Yves Wiaux * URL : http://basp-gro