On Monday 11 July 2016 12:21 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Monday 11 July 2016 12:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> If the build tool needed to build the compiled form of the work is not
>> yet in Debian, by my understanding that means the work cannot be in
>> Debian in that compiled form.
>>
>
> But t
On Monday 11 July 2016 12:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> If the build tool needed to build the compiled form of the work is not
> yet in Debian, by my understanding that means the work cannot be in
> Debian in that compiled form.
>
But the difference here is:
The compiled form is also readable and m
Pirate Praveen writes:
> There is a bug with severity serious filed against libjs-handlebars [1]
> (it is also a bug in ruby-handlebars-assets).
The bug report (bug#817092) has IMO a misleading title.
The software may or may not be free; what is at issue is that a compiled
file is non-source an
Hi,
There is a bug with severity serious filed against libjs-handlebars [1]
(it is also a bug in ruby-handlebars-assets).
The corresponding source code is present in libjs-handlebars (only in
experimental right now, but it could be reuploaded to unstable once I
have clarity).
It needs grunt to b
❦ 11 juillet 2016 05:07 CEST, german...@ya.ru :
>>Say what you want.
>
> Now I want to know if Debian Stable can in some extreme cases, like in this
> case with btrfs, replace
> not_very_good kernel module that is shipped with its current kernel
> with a kernel module from other (older or newer)
>Say what you want.
Now I want to know if Debian Stable can in some extreme cases, like in this
case with btrfs, replace
not_very_good kernel module that is shipped with its current kernel with a
kernel module from other (older or newer) version of Linux kernel and if yes,
is it the case with b
Philipp Kern (2016-07-10):
> On 2016-07-04 18:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >>How would we keep that working given that backports keeps changing?
> >Backports changing isn't an issue AFAICT if we're only publishing a
> >netinst image which has all the kernel bits (kernel udebs), as opposed
> >to ne
Hi,
On 2016-07-04 18:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
How would we keep that working given that backports keeps changing?
Backports changing isn't an issue AFAICT if we're only publishing a
netinst image which has all the kernel bits (kernel udebs), as opposed
to netboot.
Or are you thinking of othe
Hello maintainers of packages that depend in MySQL/MariaDB!
TL;DR;
We will soon ask you to change packages that depend on MySQL or
MariaDB as follows:
BEFORE: Build-Depends: libmysqlclient-dev
AFTER: Build-Depends: default-libmysqlclient-dev
BEFORE: Depends: mysql-server | virtual-mysql-server
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 09:39:03 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen
wrote:
>Yes, btrfs in kernel 3.16-18 might still be unstable, but since then
>it is got some important fixes, it is production ready and is actually
>pretty amazing in many ways.
I have severe allocation issues in btrfs with recent kernels and
r
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:10:19 +0200, german...@ya.ru wrote:
>But does Debian Stable have this new and relatively stable version of btrfs or
>it just uses old and not_so_stable version from 3.16 version of Linux kernel?
Stop ranting.
Say what you want. And while you're at it, think about stating y
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
>> Hi Emilio!
>>
>> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any
>> DE,
>> but they were compatible with the traditional look of windows and based on
>> the
>> GTK library. So w
On 10/07/16 15:14, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
>> On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
>>> Hi Emilio!
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any
>>> DE,
>>> but they were compatible with the traditional look of window
m
On 10 July 2016 08:59:59 CEST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I foupml0lnd
>http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
>> which makes things clearer. Thisf seems to be a cross-desktop (Matea)
>> $₩p5p!4♧''
On 07/10/2016 09:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I don't follow how it is "same concern": As I understand the blog post,
> the very purpose of X-Apps is to be desktop-agnostic. Do you consider
> pluma well suited as a desktop-agnostic editor? It currently links
> against libmate-desktop-2-17 a
>Yes, btrfs in kernel 3.16-18 might still be unstable, but since then
>it is got some important fixes, it is production ready and is actually
>pretty amazing in many ways.
But does Debian Stable have this new and relatively stable version of btrfs or
it just uses old and not_so_stable version fro
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-07-10 08:59:59)
> On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I found
> > http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
> > which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate,
> > Cinnamon... XFCE?) pr
On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I found http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
> which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate,
> Cinnamon...
> XFCE?) project to provide some core apps. Which we wouldn't end up with
> mu
18 matches
Mail list logo
