Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team
Control: block 395843 by -1
* Package name: libuncommons-maths-java
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Daniel W. Dyer
* URL : http://maths.uncommons.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:54:10PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm struggling to understand the testing excuses for s3ql at
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=s3ql. Among other things, it
> says:
> * s3ql (source, amd64, i386, arm64, armel, armhf, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
> ppc
Hello,
I'm struggling to understand the testing excuses for s3ql at
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=s3ql. Among other things, it
says:
* s3ql (source, amd64, i386, arm64, armel, armhf, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
ppc64el, s390x) has new bugs!
* Updating s3ql introduces new bugs: #792685
Ho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team
Control: block 395843 by -1
* Package name: mhap
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Sergey Koren , Konstantin Berlin
* URL : https://github.com/marbl/MHAP
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Ja
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:52:38PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > This is all great news!
> > If I'm not mistaken, the last feature that needs to be implemented in
> > wanna-build for us to be able to drop all maintainer-uploaded binaries, and
> > only ship binaries built on the buildds, is buil
On السبت 22 آب 2015 13:47, Marvin Renich wrote:
>> So it is not wrong to use this directory. Also, all alternatives are
>> > wrong in some way as well.
> I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that part of the purpose
> of /srv was to allow complete admin discretion with the directory
> st
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:26:07PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> -- are arch:all packages not building on other architectures worth filing
> >> FTBFS bugs for?
> >
> > I think this should be reported (it's probably common sense that you
> > should be able to rebuild a package on a given support
On 08/16/2015 01:22 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> Interesting, thanks. As for "The Microsoft Azure Linux Agent" [1], it is
>> Apache-2.0 licensed and should be trivially package-able...
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent
>
> It's been in Debian for years. Recently it was updated to
Hi,
On 2015-08-21 10:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Auto-building arch:all packages
> > ===
>
> > We have worked on getting arch:all packages buildable on our
> > autobuilders. We've got a fe
* Afif Elghraoui , 2015-08-22, 13:19:
Would it be a good idea for the buildds to automatically submit FTBFS
bug reports?
I don't think so. That'd be a lot of BTS noise.
I think maintainers with dozens or hundreds of packages don't monitor
all their build logs.
buildds send failure notificat
* Joachim Breitner [150822 09:04]:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> > * Joachim Breitner , 2015-08-22, 13:58:
> > > With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb
> > > file)
> > > dropped into /srv/local-apt-repository
> >
> > Soun
On السبت 22 آب 2015 07:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail
>> > on !amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've seen that a lot when
>> > doing archive rebuilds on armhf. I never got around to reporting
>> > most of FTFBFses -- are
On 22/08/15 16:48, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> -- are arch:all packages not building on other architectures worth filing
>> FTBFS bugs for?
>
> I think this should be reported (it's probably common sense that you
> should be able to
On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 21:49 +0200, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 10:43:17 +0200
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > They are now packaged in unstable (hyperv-daemons built from linux
> > -tools source), and could possible be backported to jessie if they are
> > that important. However, I thin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "gustavo panizzo (gfa)"
* Package name: python-ostestr
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Fundation.
* URL : http://www.openstack.org/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : OpenSt
* Mehdi Dogguy , 2015-08-22, 15:34:
I am not sure about the status on FTP-masters' side... but I think it
only requires the project deciding when we will enable throw-away
binaries by default. But before doing so, we should take some time
testing the arch:all packages. Once that done, the archi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Gnau
* Package name: refkeen
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : NY00123
* URL : https://github.com/NY00123/refkeen
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Ports of Keen Dreams and the Catacomb A
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I feel that arch:all packages requiring a specific architecture (or not
> > buildable on amd64) are quite marginal.
> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail on
> !amd64 despite having no valid excuse.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> Auto-building arch:all packages
> >> ===
> >> [snip]
> > This is all great news!
> > If I'm not mistaken, the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Gnau
* Package name: openomf
Version : 0.6.5
Upstream Author : Tuomas Virtanen and others
* URL : https://github.com/omf2097/openomf
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Open Source remake
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Gnau
* Package name: libshadowdive
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Tuomas Virtanen
* URL : https://github.com/omf2097/libShadowDive
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for working
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Gnau
* Package name: unlzexe
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Mitugu(Kou) Kurizono, Vesselin Bontchev
and others
* URL :
https://gitlab.com/unlzexe/unlzexe/blob/linux64Bontchev/UNLZEXE.DOC
* License : public domai
* Adam Borowski [2015-08-22 16:35]:
> On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail
> on !amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've seen that a lot when
> doing archive rebuilds on armhf. I never got around to reporting
> most of FTFBFses -- are arch:all packages not buil
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 03:34:56PM +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> I feel that arch:all packages requiring a specific architecture (or not
> buildable on amd64) are quite marginal.
On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail on
!amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've see
You visited Infographicportal.com
at some point in the past!
Please help us out and rate Infographicportal.com
(We'd really appreciate it!)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/readygraph-static/img/star_icon.png";
style="margin-left: 5px; width:30px;">http://s3.amazonaws.com/readygraph-static/img
You visited Infographicportal.com
at some point in the past!
Please help us out and rate Infographicportal.com
(We'd really appreciate it!)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/readygraph-static/img/star_icon.png";
style="margin-left: 5px; width:30px;">http://s3.amazonaws.com/readygraph-static/img
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Auto-building arch:all packages
>> ===
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
> This is all great news!
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the last feature that needs to be implemented in
> wanna-buil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alba Crespi
* Package name: r-cran-data.table
Version : 1.9.4
Upstream Author : Matt Dowle , T Short, S Lianoglou,
A Srinivasan with contributions from R Saporta, E Antonyan
* URL :
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/data.
Hi Jakub,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Joachim Breitner , 2015-08-22, 13:58:
> > With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb
> > file)
> > dropped into /srv/local-apt-repository
>
> Sounds like an FHS violation: “no program should rely on a
* Joachim Breitner , 2015-08-22, 13:58:
With this package installed, every Debian package (i.e. a *.deb file)
dropped into /srv/local-apt-repository
Sounds like an FHS violation: “no program should rely on a specific
subdirectory structure of /srv existing or data necessarily being stored
in
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITP: vertex-theme -- Vertex themes for GTK 2/3
@owner: apparently the "Source:" pseudo-header took precedence over
"Package:". Not sure this is intended, hence the CC.
Kind regards,
Andrei
On Vi, 21 aug 15, 21:19:03, Jack Henschel wrote:
> Package:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Breitner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: local-apt-repository
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Joachim Breitner
* URL :
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/local-apt-repository.git/
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 RFP: gnome-pdf-tool -- GUI tool to edit PDF metadata
On Mi, 19 aug 15, 12:30:28, Maria wrote:
> Package: gnome-pdf-tool
> Version: 2.0.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I'd be very glad if you could package the gnome-pdf-tool for Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Girrulat
* Package name: selenium-firefoxdriver
Version : 2.47.1
Upstream Author : Julian Harty,
Simon Steward,
Andreas Tolf Tolfsen,
Jim Evans,
Google I
reassign -1 wnpp
retitle -1 RFP: gnome-pdf-tool -- GUI tool to edit PDF metadata
On Mi, 19 aug 15, 12:30:28, Maria wrote:
> Package: gnome-pdf-tool
> Version: 2.0.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I'd be very glad if you could package the gnome-pdf-tool for Debian, as it
> sounds t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Couwenberg
* Package name: protozero
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : MapBox (https://github.com/mapbox/protozero/issues)
* URL : https://github.com/mapbox/protozero
* License : BSD-2-Clause and Apache-2.0
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)"
* Package name: hackpad
Version : git
Upstream Author : Hackpad
* URL : https://github.com/dropbox/hackpad
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Scala, JavaScript
Description
37 matches
Mail list logo
