* Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> [2015-08-22 16:35]: > On the other hand, there's a crapload of arch:all packages that fail > on !amd64 despite having no valid excuse. I've seen that a lot when > doing archive rebuilds on armhf. I never got around to reporting > most of FTFBFses -- are arch:all packages not building on other > architectures worth filing FTBFS bugs for?
I think so, although I wouldn't file them as RC bugs. (Strictly speaking, they are, but I'd go with severity important.) I was thinking of doing a build of arch:all packages on arm64 and reporting the issues, but I haven't done it yet. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
