Bug#775711: ITP: libmodule-install-rtx-perl -- RT extension installer

2015-01-18 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: KURASHIKI Satoru * Package name: libmodule-install-rtx-perl Version : 0.37 Upstream Author : Best Practical Solutions Audrey Tang * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Install-RTx * License : MIT

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

2015-01-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 08:37 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few > > weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and > > nnn-submitter@ should be no different fro

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

2015-01-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few > weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and > nnn-submitter@ should be no different from mailing nnn@, and until I > allow submitters to opt out of e

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports

2015-01-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, jnqnfe wrote: > I think that Ideally the BTS should offer per-bug subscription > functionality, like bugzilla. We do, but because it's not directly integrated into the BTS, the BTS is unaware of who is subscribed. Actually fixing this is on the gigantic todo list. -- Don Ar

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports

2015-01-18 Thread jnqnfe
I think that Ideally the BTS should offer per-bug subscription functionality, like bugzilla. Submitter and maintainer would be added to the list automatically upon submission of the bug report; contributors to the bug report could also be added automatically upon submission of their message. Anyone

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

2015-01-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > I guess, changing semantics of bugnumber[-something]@b.d.o yet again > will not be considered. Actually, I think that the way we handle nnn-* is pretty much wrong, but it's wrong for mainly historical and manpower reasons. I'm going to put together a b

Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

2015-01-18 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Am 18.01.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:07:35PM +, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote: >> we have had no discussion over #773359; your

new pre-dependency: perl{,-base,-modules} -> dpkg (>= 1.17.17)

2015-01-18 Thread Niko Tyni
In order to fix trigger related wheezy->jessie upgrade failures in xfonts-traditional (#774844, cc'd), I intend to make the main perl binary packages (perl, perl-base, and perl-modules) Pre-Depend on dpkg (>= 1.17.17), which has this change: * Defer trigger processing if the package does not ful

Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package

2015-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:07:35PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote: > > > > we have had no discussion > > > over #773359; your response is effectively placing words in my mou

Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package

2015-01-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote: > > we have had no discussion > > over #773359; your response is effectively placing words in my mouth > > and I will not tolerate that. To confound matters, I wasn't eve

Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package

2015-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:48:33PM +, Steven Capper wrote: > Mathieu, > I'm writing to express my increasing frustration at activities you've > instigated surrounding the tbb package that I maintain. > > Over the Christmas period a bug report was raised: > #773359 "package tbb_4.2~20140122-4 F