I think that Ideally the BTS should offer per-bug subscription functionality, like bugzilla. Submitter and maintainer would be added to the list automatically upon submission of the bug report; contributors to the bug report could also be added automatically upon submission of their message. Anyone (possibly baring submitter and maintainer) could add or remove themselves to the bug's subscription list via control. Any messages received at the bug address would be sent automatically to everyone on the subscription list.
On 19/01/2015 00:06, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> I guess, changing semantics of bugnumber[-something]@b.d.o yet again >> will not be considered. > Actually, I think that the way we handle nnn-* is pretty much wrong, but > it's wrong for mainly historical and manpower reasons. > > I'm going to put together a bit more firm of a proposal in the next few > weeks, but I think that basically everything but nnn-done@ and > nnn-submitter@ should be no different from mailing nnn@, and until I > allow submitters to opt out of e-mail, mailing nnn-submitter@ should be > no different from e-mailing nnn@ either. > > I don't know what to do about contributors to a bug being e-mailed as > well, but maybe even they should also be e-mailed by default... but I've > been making the perfect the enemy of the good for too long here, I think. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54bc4d45.5090...@gmail.com
