Who needs to document their own pc they hack on daily?
suddenly I couldnt just place a script in rc2.d folder anymore, needed to
symlink
needed to add an lsb header too it seems
maybe I'm overlooking something
I prefer to hack on my own without using debian tools, update-rc.d i.e.
would be nic
Hey Paul,
I really appreciate your feedback. Glad to see that at least, systemd in
Debian have some boundaries. Whew! Tks!
I'll try to disable html messages for all Debian Lists at my GMail account
right now, sorry about that.
Nevertheless, I'm not flaming (not my intention, really), I care abou
Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists.
Please do not flame on Debian lists.
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> tried it without success, lots of bugs popped everywhere when wit
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:35:05AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> * consider skipping jessie altogether in the hope jessie+1 will
>> provide alternatives or, at least has a systemd where development
>> speed went down significantly.
>
> Tha
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 04:25:31 +0200
with message-id <5445c41b.5090...@tnnn.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#765719: general: System restarts on "shutdown -h now"
has caused the Debian Bug report #765719,
regarding general: System restarts on "shutdown -h now"
to be marked as done.
This
Thank you very much, that worked instantly! I don't know why kexec-tools
was installed, but now, it isn't any longer and the reboot-cycle is
broken.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:28:18 +0200
Moritz wrote:
* What led up to the situation?
After t
On 20/10/2014 13:50, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> sofia-sip 1.12.11+20110422.1-2 Failed [UNKNOWN] /bin/sh: 4: pushd: not
> found
>> bashism, you should reportbug that, RC severity (Policy 10.4)
> hdf-eos4 2.19v1.00+dfsg.1-1 Failed [UNKNOWN] ../libtool: 1: eval:
> base_compile+= -c: not found
> libvis
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spatial4j-0.4
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author :
* URL or Web page : http://spatial4j.github.io/spatial4j/
* License : Apache-2.0
Description : spatial/geospatial Java library
This is a newer versi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
No, please don't. It's neither useful, productive nor funny.
>
Actually your message is even worse. It isn't useful or productive. And
it certainly isn't funny.
But it is definitely censorious, which I, and I suspect many others, find
offen
Okay, I agree with you. I just find two bugs when with systemd, I'll fill
the bug reports. Those problems I'm seeing are reproducible.
Please, forgive me, I don't want to make things worse, I just want to *express
my concerns* about this "systemd-situation"...
I'm with Debian because *it is uniqu
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:12:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > "header only C++ library package" seems to be more common.
>
> As I see the replies
> trie data structure of marisa (my problem)
> large portion of boost(Dimitri)
> STL (Dimitri)
> seqan
>
If you have the unresistible urge to act, then go fix a bug. Or
help with triaging the bugs - finding reproducible test case
also helps. Turn that urge into something productive. Flaming
in the mailing list isn't helpful, it's exactly the oposite.
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 21:0
But I need to act (at least, say something) to preserve our distro and I
cannot remain in silence. Sorry... This isn't intended to be fun.
Cheers!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 16:57, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> > I really do NOT want to start a fl
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you
guys are tired about this "init" subject appearing over and
over...
No, you wanted to add more oil on existing flamewars and you
know it. If you don't want to start the flamewars,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:59:29PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-10-20 14:19 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> Have you tried rebuilding the archive with the new version of dash? If
> >> not, perhaps get in touch with David Suá
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libstruct-dumb-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Struct-Dumb
* License
Sorry man... English isn't my native language, is hard for me to express
myself in another language... But yes, those sources aren't the best but,
there are more, you know. :-P
Best!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 15:55, Axel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martinx - ジェームズ writes:
> > I really do NOT wan
Hi,
Martinx - ジェームズ writes:
> I really do NOT want to start a flame war
This statement is evidently false or misguided.
I'd love to leave it at that (see?), but:
> Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTY1MzA
>
> L
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Glaser writes:
>> "If you don't want to use my software on general principles, go away and
>> write your own. Do not bother me."
>>
>> This principle is hardly specific to systemd.
>
> Yes, but other upstreams at least agree to not step on the
> toes of people who wish to
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 01:34:13PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> cc:ing the apt maintainers to get their opinion on making this the default...
[Disclaimer: I have written the APT part of it. I might be biased.]
Hell no – as this isn't the point of the implementation. It is intended
to help resear
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> David Kalnischkies:
> > > Apitude, too, *really* likes to choose 500 deletions rather than upgrading
> > > even a single package to a version with slightly-lower priority (as
> > > defined
> > > in /etc/apt/pref*), but at least yo
Guys,
I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you guys are tired
about this "init" subject appearing over and over... But, my turn...:-P
*First things first: Why I'm with Debian / Ubuntu?*
A.: Because *I like the work of Debian Maintainers* (you guys and gals,
sirs and madam
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Christoph Biedl
wrote:
> * sit and watch the things happen they don't agree with at all, things
That's not true, literally ***it can't be true***
It is in clear view that the _majority_ agrees, and every single of us
*must* fall under one of the categories listed
On 2014-10-20 14:19 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2014-10-01 16:04, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> > Hi, I uploaded a new version of dash (0.5.8-1) to experimental, please
>> > help testing it. If no critical issues arise, I plan to put th
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Debian installations I have at least three serious issues that prevent
> systemd based systems from booting or being usable¹.
Are you willing to file bug reports about these issues?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Christoph Biedl:
> > - upstream shows little respect for people who object systemd
>
> Why should they?
Because not doing that is asocial.
> "If you don't want to use my software on general principles, go away and
> write your own. Do not bother m
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I see. By the way, I have never seen package using Build-Using in
> debian/control which is documented in policy. Is there any automatic
> way to set the used-source:Version of package used? Something like ...
>
> Built-Using: marisa (== ${used-source:Ver
On 10/18/2014 05:14 AM, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> As I wrote previously, this may only happen if we decide to have such a
>> library as essential, otherwise this forces to use pre-depends, which
>> isn't good.
>
> IMO using pre-depends is a lot better than adding a package to
> essential, but I'd rathe
Hi,
Christoph Biedl:
> - upstream shows little respect for people who object systemd
Why should they?
"If you don't want to use my software on general principles, go away and
write your own. Do not bother me."
This principle is hardly specific to systemd.
> I have at least three serious iss
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> time for this is quite limited.
You and me both, unfortunately.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini"
[16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 09:23:56PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
> On 18 October 2014 17:19, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is about packaging around a header only C++ library package.
...
> > "header only C++ library package" seems to be more common.
As I see the replies
t
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:35:05AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> * consider skipping jessie altogether in the hope jessie+1 will
> provide alternatives or, at least has a systemd where development
> speed went down significantly.
That's backwards -- it's the future that's at risk, jessie is a fi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:50:55PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > See #766048, I rate the results as ciritical issues ;), and so won't
>
> I’ve glanced at the list referenced.
>
> Some things that immediately come to mind:
Hi, I'd very appreciate help
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> See #766048, I rate the results as ciritical issues ;), and so won't
I’ve glanced at the list referenced.
Some things that immediately come to mind:
autoconf2.64 2.64-3 Failed [CONFIGURE_ERROR] configure: error: no acceptable m4
could be found in $PATH
Matthias Urlichs wrote...
> We don't do a GR among our users. We do that among Debian
> members/maintainers/developers/take-your-pick.
>
> Of those, most …
> * are perfectly happy with the TC's decision
> * can live with it
> * are unhappy, but think that to continue discussing this is way worse
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:08:20PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stephan Seitz writes:
> > Is this a release critical bug? As a testing user I now have problems
> > using bcron.
>
> Given that this is a migration that's barely been started, I think it
> would be best for bcron-run to continue to P
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-10-01 16:04, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > Hi, I uploaded a new version of dash (0.5.8-1) to experimental, please
> > help testing it. If no critical issues arise, I plan to put this
> > version into unstable in about two weeks.
>
On Jo, 16 oct 14, 17:35:09, Martin Read wrote:
>
> mormegil@cocytus:~$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00dontbeanidiot
> Aptitude::ProblemResolver {
> SolutionCost "priority, removals, canceled-actions";
I've had better (as in "not unexpected") results with just 'removals'.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Eigen.
Yes, that was it. Thanks.
OK, we have some examples, I hope this helps the OP ;-)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh-
ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates i
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:36:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've been using things like ldap and the keyring before to come up
> with the number of DDs and was never very happy with it. I've
> recently also been pointed to that. I wish it was better
> integrated so that I can query it.
I've
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jérémy Lal"
* Package name: node-tap
Version : 0.4.13
Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter
* URL : https://github.com/isaacs/node-tap
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : A Test-Anything-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: boxer-data
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Jonas Smedegaard
* URL : https://wiki.debian.org/Boxer
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: YAM
42 matches
Mail list logo
