Marko Randjelovic writes:
> Additional arguments in favor of sysvinit:
[...]
Hi Marko,
The pro-sysvinit page on https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem
currently doesn't even a maintainer, and at least some members of the
tech committee have said that they'll make their decision mostly based
o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
* Package name: vtk6
Version : 6.0.0
Upstream Author : Kitware
* URL : http://www.vtk.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Visualization Toolkit (VTK) version 6
The Visualization
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
* Package name: qcustomplot
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Emanuel Eichhammer
* URL : http://www.qcustomplot.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : QCustomPlot is a Qt C++ widg
This has now been discussed ad nauseam. Can we please stop posting about
this on -devel and let the tech-ctte work?
Thanks,
Paul
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:30 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 02:54 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> > Additional
On 11/08/2013 02:54 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> Additional arguments in favor of sysvinit:
>
> * systemd and upstart lead to vendor lock-in; it will be complicated
> later to return back or change to third option, as well to change from
> first to second option
Exactly what vendor would we be
Additional arguments in favor of sysvinit:
* systemd and upstart lead to vendor lock-in; it will be complicated
later to return back or change to third option, as well to change from
first to second option
* I don't have a feeling that configuration can be very simpler than
shell scripts; there a
Jonathan Dowland wrote (03 Nov 2013 14:44:49 GMT) :
> What desktop environment are you using: E.g., GNOME3, KDE, XFCE, LXDE…
> If GNOME 3, do you know whether you are using it in "normal" mode or
> "classic" mode (aka fallback mode, sometimes)?
I experience exactly the same behavior on current s
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:44:23 -0600
Conrad Nelson wrote:
> Not everyone is a programmer, but a lot of non-programmers are still
> admins but are not interested in working with shell scripts if they
> don't have to.
We already have: skeleton, /etc/default. I agree it's poor, but
as I said, and
ольга крыжановская dixit:
>Thorsten, thanks for the review, but the package was not intended for
>official review yet. I only send it around, to find a mentor, and then
>weed out the bugs, one by one, and some one else leaked that posting
>to debian-devel, before the work was ready.
Ah, okay. But
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda"
* Package name: catkin-pkg
Version : 0.1.23
Upstream Author : Dirk Thomas
* URL : https://github.com/ros/catkin/tags
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Low
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda"
* Package name: catkin
Version : 0.1.23
Upstream Author : Dirk Thomas
* URL : https://github.com/ros/catkin/tags
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Low-
Hi Olga!
On 11/08/2013 09:44 AM, ольга крыжановская wrote:
> Thorsten, thanks for the review, but the package was not intended for
> official review yet. I only send it around, to find a mentor, and then
> weed out the bugs, one by one, and some one else leaked that posting
> to debian-devel, befo
Thorsten, thanks for the review, but the package was not intended for
official review yet. I only send it around, to find a mentor, and then
weed out the bugs, one by one, and some one else leaked that posting
to debian-devel, before the work was ready.
The package was intentionally AMD64 only for
13 matches
Mail list logo
