Thorsten, thanks for the review, but the package was not intended for official review yet. I only send it around, to find a mentor, and then weed out the bugs, one by one, and some one else leaked that posting to debian-devel, before the work was ready. The package was intentionally AMD64 only for now, to simplify testing. I already have a better, more cross platform version, but still would prefer to work out the dependencies one, by one, as you already found out.
Olga On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Thorsten Glaser <tg <at> mirbsd.de> writes: > >> No, it isn’t – but you could build-depend on mksh, if the script >> can be run with it (haven’t tested it), possibly with a few changes > > OK, I’ve tried with the following patch: > > diff -Nru ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control > --- ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control 2013-01-07 16:58:44.000000000 +0100 > +++ ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control 2013-11-08 00:58:27.000000000 +0100 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk> > Homepage: http://www.kornshell.com/ > -Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1), debhelper (>= 7) > +Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1), debhelper (>= 7), mksh > Standards-Version: 3.9.4 > > Package: ksh > diff -Nru ksh-93v-20131010/debian/rules ksh-93v-20131010/debian/rules > --- ksh-93v-20131010/debian/rules 2013-11-05 01:41:56.000000000 +0100 > +++ ksh-93v-20131010/debian/rules 2013-11-08 00:57:58.000000000 +0100 > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > build-arch: build-stamp > build-indep: build-stamp > build-stamp: > - /usr/bin/ksh debian/buildksh93.sh build.opt.linux.i386.64bit.gcc.c99 > + mksh debian/buildksh93.sh build.opt.linux.i386.64bit.gcc.c99 > touch build-stamp > > clean: > > This scared me a bit already: “build.opt.linux.i386.64bit.gcc.c99” > > Trying to build it in a clean cowbuilder environment spits out things like: > > package: warning: yacc: not found -- some make actions may fail > package: warning: bison: not found -- some make actions may fail > > These are more missing Build-Depends. > > Then, it fails: > > package: gcc -std=gnu99 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -m64 -fPIC -lm -ldl: failed to > compile this program: > int main(){return 0;} > In file included from <command-line>:0:0: > /usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file > or directory > #include <bits/predefs.h> > ^ > > This is only natural because I’m building for i386, where -m64 is > utterly wrong. > > In short, your package will not work for Debian as-is and needs, > possibly major, rework. > > Sorry, > //mirabilos > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20131108t010231-...@post.gmane.org > -- , _ _ , { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } .----'-/`-/ olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com \-`\-'----. `'-..-| / http://twitter.com/fleyta \ |-..-'` /\/\ Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer /\/\ `--` `--` -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+oh3v2k8jpkgeogip_1bexd8fgqxopi5xgvydai4snumvq...@mail.gmail.com
