On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 07:48:20PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | If you're using cdbs and r-cran.mk in debian/rules, you can add
> | Depends: ${R:Depends} to debian/control to pick up the current binary
> | dependency. I've migrated almost all of my packages over and it makes
> | life easier
On 6 April 2013 at 21:55, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| > R> print(todo[ order(todo[,2]), ], row.names=FALSE)
| >pkg
maint
| > r-cran-erm
j...@debian.org
| >r-cran-raschsampl
On 6 April 2013 at 19:30, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| > So something doesn't make sense somewhere: if my package doesn't care
| > which version of R it's building against, but R itself cares, then
| > surely there should be some way of querying r
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> So something doesn't make sense somewhere: if my package doesn't care
> which version of R it's building against, but R itself cares, then
> surely there should be some way of querying r-base-dev during the
> build process to enquire which ver
Hi, sorry for the delay.
Yes, I'm active. I was waiting the new realease to find a sponsor and work
with the new version of the package.
Thanks for the bug reports. I'm going to check them out.
2013/4/6
> fotoxx version 13.04 is available:
> http://www.kornelix.com/uploads/1/3/0/3/13035936/fot
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> First off, let me apologize. I clearly did this the wrong way and should have
> contacted -release and -devel beforehand. My bad -- I'm sorry for extra work
> this created for the release managers and maintainer, particularly at t
> +++ Jonathan Dowland [2013-04-05 10:09 +0100]:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > This java code should be replaces with something in perl/python/non-JVM.
> >
> > Why?
[Wookey]
> Because it's an entirely unnecessary circular build-dependency. java
> is not p
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:45 PM, carlos wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Thanks for your time and job!
> I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin > 2.15,
> even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package.
> Is thought to have libc 2.17 o
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 01:08:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> I like the idea of an api virtual package, as it requires little work from the
> parties involved and solves most of the problem.
I do not only like this but IMHO it is perfectly needed (as for any
other language system we are pa
fotoxx version 13.04 is available:
http://www.kornelix.com/uploads/1/3/0/3/13035936/fotoxx-13.04.tar.gz
The Debian watch file needs to be updated.
Is the package maintainer still active?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:45:15PM -0500, carlos wrote:
> I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin >
> 2.15, even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package.
> Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon?
As experimental already has 2.17 for some time, I suppo
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:45:15 -0500, carlos
wrote:
>Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon?
Unlikely. Even unstable has only libc 2.13, and at this stage of the
release I guess that hell will freeze over before the release team
will allow a new libc upstream version into Debian wheezy
12 matches
Mail list logo
