> +++ Jonathan Dowland [2013-04-05 10:09 +0100]: > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > > > This java code should be replaces with something in perl/python/non-JVM. > > > > Why?
[Wookey] > Because it's an entirely unnecessary circular build-dependency. java > is not part of build-essential and this doesn't seem like a good > reason for making it so. This sounds like a packaging tool, not a build tool. (At least, I _hope_ nobody is thinking of generating debian/rules during the build process!) I'd say anyone packaging Java stuff probably has a JVM. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130406183437.gw4...@p12n.org
