Le 25/06/2012 19:35, Aron Xu a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Regarding your question, it is recommended to do as follow during freeze:
>
> unstable: any version that you would like to hit testing soon, so it's
> the version that Release Team agreed (or likely) to unblock it.
unstable would also works for ne
Le Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:03:13PM +0100, Philip Ashmore a écrit :
> Hi there.
>
> I would like to invite you to the Doodle poll "Debian BSP, Dublin, Ireland".
Hi,
I would like to advertise Selectricity, which is Free software.
http://selectricity.org/
It is not designed with the same goals
Hi there.
I've got a Samsung NP-RF711-S07UK laptop - it's so new that Samsungs own
website doesn't list it.
Here's a link with product specs:
http://www.elaraonline.co.uk/productdetail.aspx?productcode=ECE2391461
Anyway, it's got back-light+hot-keys+fan control issues.
It turns out that even
Hi,
On Thursday 21 June 2012 23:03:34 shirish शिरीष wrote:
> > More details, comparison to other approaches, and more information can
> > be found at:
> > http://http.debian.net/
>
> I *think* it should be also beneficial for jigdo stuff as well.
Yes. Not sure how the downloader used by jigdo ha
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, John David Anglin wrote:
> >>Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all
> >>hppa-specific bug reports?
> >>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa
> >why? it's still a port.
> I am still building unstable packages and
Hi there.
I got into a delete-those-emails frenzy earlier and assumed I could read
them on Debians mailing list.
This is true only if someone doesn't mail me personally, which I now
realise happened wrt. an email
suggesting it be hosted in Cork.
Please send the email to me or the list again -
On 25-Jun-12, at 7:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 25.06.2012 19:34, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all
hppa-specific bug reports?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa
why? it's still a port.
On 25.06.2012 19:34, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all
> hppa-specific bug reports?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa
why? it's still a port.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
Hi Matthew,
On Montag, 25. Juni 2012, Matthew Grant wrote:
> Message #32 received at fakecontrol@fakecontrolmessage (full text, mbox):
>
> From: Debbugs Internal Request
> To: internal_cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Internal Control
> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:42:08 +
> # A New Hope
> #
OK, finally followed things. My own bad...
IMHO, I find Debian bug reports are bit confusing to follow.
Thank you for being patient with me.
Matthew Grant
On 26/06/12 10:41, Matthew Grant wrote:
> This is from the maintainer of the racoon and ipsec-tools package!
>
> Tested on linux kernel 3.
On 25/06/12 23:07, Mika Pflüger wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:03:13 +0100
schrieb Philip Ashmore:
Hi there.
I would like to invite you to the Doodle poll "Debian BSP, Dublin,
Ireland".
I've pencilled the weekends in July initially, unless there are
compelling reasons for a different mont
This is from the maintainer of the racoon and ipsec-tools package!
Tested on linux kernel 3.2 in testing/unstable, racoon 0.8.0-9+ sha384
and sha512 hmac and authentication ARE WORKING
Please do not reopen bugs with no EMAIL as to WHY!!!
I have not RECEIVED any INFORMATION about this. THI
On 25/06/12 16:03, Martín Ferrari wrote:
Hi Phillip,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Philip Ashmore
wrote:
It's come to my attention that bug squashing parties are _the_ way to fix
bugs.
Not to be seen as uncool, I'm proposing a bug squashing party somewhere in
Dublin, Ireland at a mutuall
Hi there.
I would like to invite you to the Doodle poll "Debian BSP, Dublin, Ireland".
I've pencilled the weekends in July initially, unless there are
compelling reasons for a different month.
I haven't decided on a location yet as it is subject to sponsorship
and/or space donation.
Please
Hi Holger,
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> retitle 678519 after about a month, routing gets wedged
>> # not a general problem affecting a large portion of the archive
>> reassign 678519 base
>
> reassigning bugs from general to base is pretty useless, a
Hi,
On Montag, 25. Juni 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Basically the base-pseudo package is pretty useless as well, all it's
> > (current) bugs should probabyl be carefully assigned to the kernel, for
> > #678519 I just wasnt sure yet if its really a kernel or user
> > configuration problem...
> P
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:23:58PM -0600, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > retitle 678519 after about a month, routing gets wedged
> > # not a general problem affecting a large portion of the archive
> > reassign 678519 base
>
> reassig
]] Thomas Goirand
> > None of those provide well-working multi-user video chats, which was
> > what the discussion started with.
>
> I don't agree. Have you ever tried BBB or SIP video?
Yes, I've used both BBB and SIP professionally. They don't work
particularly well across the wide internet.
* Ben Hutchings [120625 19:21]:
> GNU make's implicit rules use CPPFLAGS. If other build systems or
> overriden rules don't use it, it's a bug. This can of course be
> worked around in debian/rules.
I'd not call it a bug. It's just some stranger behavior. Not more strange
than not using make bu
Hi,
On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > snippets on YouTube would help with publicity here.
feel free to upload Debian videos to youtube, if the licence allows so. this
has been done several times already...
> Please discuss that with the Debian video team. But don't be sur
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: librdf-crypt-perl
Version : 0.002
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/RDF-Crypt
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description :
Hi Jonathan,
On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> retitle 678519 after about a month, routing gets wedged
> # not a general problem affecting a large portion of the archive
> reassign 678519 base
reassigning bugs from general to base is pretty useless, as both pseudo-
packages bugs
❦ 25 juin 2012 14:28 CEST, Tanguy Ortolo :
>> The change between Wheezy and Squeeze is that roundcube-sqlite package
>> has been dropped.
>
> Any specific reason for that? Looking at the upstream website, they do
> not seem to have dropped SQLite compatibility…
PHP doesn't have support for SQLi
Hi,
Regarding your question, it is recommended to do as follow during freeze:
unstable: any version that you would like to hit testing soon, so it's
the version that Release Team agreed (or likely) to unblock it.
experimental: any version that won't make its way to unstable,
including usual expe
Since there is no hppa port any longer, shouldn't we close all
hppa-specific bug reports?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?status=open;include=subject%3Ahppa
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore H
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:55:53PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/6/24 Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> >> Why? Just to have it autotools-compatible? If I was writing a custom
> >> build system I would be thinking about using -Wp option, since that's
> >> exactly why it's there for — to pass some options to t
On 06/25/2012 07:38 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Thomas Goirand
>
>
>> For the booking of tickets, (public system) car software, etc., we
>> have no choice.
>>
> Sure we have, you can always use a bike or your feet or a sailboat.
>
What does this has to do with using Hangout??? Come
On 06/25/2012 06:45 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> On 06/25/2012 09:49 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> On 25/06/12 06:07, YunQiang Su wrote:
1. upload 2.0 to experimental, and unstable users should install it
manually.
>>>
>>> This is usu
Quoting Martín Ferrari (martin.ferr...@gmail.com):
> Have you thought of a place, or talked with anybody about that? I'm
> thinking the TOG might be a good place.
Isn't there some random company over there that actually happens to
employ several DDs (and might be responsible for the sudden incre
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 09:49 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 25/06/12 06:07, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> 1. upload 2.0 to experimental, and unstable users should install it
>>> manually.
>>
>> This is usually the right answer: if version 1.0 is intended t
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:57:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> But I still think this would be a good idea:
>
> > Perhaps it would be better to have the wiki page point to a suitable
> > gitweb page ? This one perhaps:
> >
> >
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.gi
2012/6/24 Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Why? Just to have it autotools-compatible? If I was writing a custom
>> build system I would be thinking about using -Wp option, since that's
>> exactly why it's there for — to pass some options to the preprocessor
>> (or, being honest, I would ignore CPPFLAGS unl
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:00:56 +0100
Philip Ashmore wrote:
> It's come to my attention that bug squashing parties are _the_ way to
> fix bugs.
>
> Not to be seen as uncool, I'm proposing a bug squashing party somewhere
> in Dublin, Ireland at a mutually agreed date and time.
You could do an onl
Hi Phillip,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Philip Ashmore
wrote:
> It's come to my attention that bug squashing parties are _the_ way to fix
> bugs.
>
> Not to be seen as uncool, I'm proposing a bug squashing party somewhere in
> Dublin, Ireland at a mutually agreed date and time.
That is a g
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:59:30PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
> Le 25-06-2012, à 14:47:58 +0100, Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) a écrit :
>
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
> > > I noticed that some scripts in /etc/init.d/ are suffixed by .sh an
Hi,
I am neutral about discussion on if one more WM should be uploaded or not.
I am concerned about this package description of ITP and I wish it is
improved if it is uploaded to Debian.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Mickaël Raybaud-Roig wrote:
...
>
> So WMFS has the following fea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Elmar S. Heeb"
* Package name: ldap-git-backup
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Elmar S. Heeb
* URL : https://github.com/elmar/ldap-git-backup
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Back up LDAP
Le 25-06-2012, à 14:47:58 +0100, Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
> > I noticed that some scripts in /etc/init.d/ are suffixed by .sh and some are
> > not. [...] All except console-screen.sh, hwclock.sh and keymap.
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About the Restrictions and Features field."):
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About the Restrictions and Features
> field."):
> > Indeed, sorry about that. I tried to merge the changes ~30 mins ago, but
> > I first need to put my hands on the current Git
On 25/06/12 14:47, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
>> PS: Is there a way to list all packages putting a file in /etc/init.d/?
>
> dpkg -S $(ls -1 /etc/init.d/*)
Or if you want the complete set, not just those you have installed,
install
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
> I noticed that some scripts in /etc/init.d/ are suffixed by .sh and some are
> not. [...] All except console-screen.sh, hwclock.sh and keymap.sh are from
> the initscripts package.
>
> So 1) nowhere is .sh suffixing mentioned
Hi Philip,
On 25 June 2012 07:00, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> Not to be seen as uncool, I'm proposing a bug squashing party somewhere in
> Dublin, Ireland at a mutually agreed date and time.
I'm based in Dublin, Ireland, as are a handful of DDs. I don't think
there has been an Irish BSP event before
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: [DEP 8] About the Restrictions and Features
field."):
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:15:56PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Apparently http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/ is not being kept
> > up-to-date. :|
>
> Indeed, sorry about that. I tried to merge the changes ~30 m
* Ian Jackson , 2012-06-25, 13:44:
You might be interested in my own minimalistic DEP-8 test runner:
https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/debian-misc/src/tip/sadt
Oooh, how exciting, another implementation :-).
On this subject, I ought to point out that (thinking I had the only
implementation) I fixed
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:15:56PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> | autopkgtest (2.0.0) unstable; urgency=medium
> |
> | * Incompatible test declaration spec changes:
> | - no-build-needed is now the default; build-needed is a Restriction
> |that tests which need it have to declare.
>
>
* Charles Plessy , 2012-06-23, 12:33:
reading DEP 8's appendix, I wonder about the necessity to keep separate
Restrictions and Features fields. For instance, the no-build-needed
Feature could also be a needs-build restriction.
I noticed this only today:
| autopkgtest (2.0.0) unstable; urgency
Svante Signell kirjoitti:
>On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 08:19 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> Which wm does that? I know it isn't gnome-shell at least, as I've
>been
>> using it quite successfully without nm installed.
>
>Have you tried to use evolution without NM?
Evolution is not, so far as
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Is it possible to run autopkgtest without a virtual
machine ?"):
> Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: Is it possible to run autopkgtest without a virtual
> machine ?"):
> > You might be interested in my own minimalistic DEP-8 test runner:
> > https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/debian-misc/
Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: Is it possible to run autopkgtest without a virtual
machine ?"):
> You might be interested in my own minimalistic DEP-8 test runner:
> https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/debian-misc/src/tip/sadt
Oooh, how exciting, another implementation :-).
Thanks,
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Charles Plessy writes ("[DEP 8] About the Restrictions and Features field."):
> reading DEP 8's appendix, I wonder about the necessity to keep separate
> Restrictions and Features fields. For instance, the no-build-needed Feature
> could also be a needs-build restriction. Perhaps the specificatio
* Charles Plessy , 2012-06-22, 17:46:
adt-run needs a virtual machine. I know that some developers have
some workarounds, but couldn't autopkgtest also support running tests
on the local system? This would be tremendously useful when the tests
can be contained in the binary packages, as it woul
Vincent Bernat, 2012-06-23 12:55+0200:
> The change between Wheezy and Squeeze is that roundcube-sqlite package
> has been dropped.
Any specific reason for that? Looking at the upstream website, they do
not seem to have dropped SQLite compatibility…
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo
| `-'Deb
Charles Plessy writes ("[DEP 8] Re: Is it possible to run autopkgtest without a
virtual machine ?"):
> For networking, how about a "needs-networking" restriction ?
I'm definitely in general in favour of expanding the set of
restrictions etc. We need to be sure that the semantics are clear
though
Steve R. Petruzzello, 2012-06-25 13:51+0200:
> the Debian Policy Manuel, and one can read (subsection 9.3.2 Writing the
> scripts) that "These scripts should be named /etc/init.d/package". I failed to
> find another reference to script naming in the rest of the document.
>
> So […] 2) some scripts
Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Is it possible to run autopkgtest without a virtual
machine ?"):
> I guess that the next step is to let autopkgtest run as a user
> (http://bugs.debian.org/648148), make it easier to invoke
> (adt-virt-null is not mentionned in the manual page, and even with
> --no-buil
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Steve R. Petruzzello wrote:
|| I noticed that some scripts in /etc/init.d/ are suffixed by .sh and some
|| are not. On my sytem:
[...]
|| So 1) nowhere is .sh suffixing mentioned and 2) some scripts are not named
|| by their package's name (hwclock.s
Hi,
I noticed that some scripts in /etc/init.d/ are suffixed by .sh and some are
not. On my sytem:
host:/etc/init.d# ls -1 *.sh
bootmisc.sh
checkfs.sh
checkroot.sh
console-screen.sh
hostname.sh
hwclock.sh
keymap.sh
mountall-bootclean.sh
mountall.sh
mountdevsubfs.sh
mountkernfs.sh
mountnfs-bootcl
]] Thomas Goirand
> For the booking of tickets, (public system) car software, etc., we
> have no choice.
Sure we have, you can always use a bike or your feet or a sailboat.
> But for being connected together, we do:
> - IRC
> - Jabber
> - Mumble
> - BBB (though you need the non-free flash play
]] Neil Williams
> Popcon indicates almost nothing - least of all popularity. The
> weaknesses of popcon for archive-related questions is well documented.
> It might give a hint but it is *not* a reliable indicator.
While it's not perfect, I'm not aware of any better tool we have.
Relying on hea
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:55:56PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Will also try to find a way to better deal with such cases.
Maybe get the continent from the IANA to RIR allocation?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
+++ Thomas Goirand [2012-06-25 05:12 +0800]:
> On 06/21/2012 10:09 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> For the booking of tickets, (public system) car software, etc., we
> have no choice.
Actually you can run your car on free software (since 2011), although
it's definately still at the 'enthusiast' leve
Hello,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:36:20 -0400
Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> * Package name: libzapojit
What a funny name, hehe :)
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 08:19 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>
> Adam Borowski kirjoitti:
>
> >Sure, let's start removals with ones that hard-depend on things a
> >window
> >manager shouldn't touch, like network-manager.
Yes, why not!
> Which wm does that? I know it isn't gnome-shell at l
Hello,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:36:13 +0100
Neil Williams wrote:
> If it can be justified. That's what the objective comparison would
> need to demonstrate. That's an established pattern in Debian - if
> someone wants to add something which is the same as something else,
> there should be a good r
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
>> > I've read that some SSDs really *dislike* the way Linux does TRIM
>> > batching (or doesn't :p), so yes, it may well be that on most SSDs
>> > regular fstrim will do
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:57:29PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> > Release notes are meant to be read once, not every time you upgrade a
>> > system. Having a debconf note once might be appropriate. The second
>> > time, you'll go "right, I've seen that before". The thi
On 06/25/2012 09:49 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/06/12 06:07, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> 1. upload 2.0 to experimental, and unstable users should install it manually.
>
> This is usually the right answer: if version 1.0 is intended to go in
> the next Debian release, it should get as much testing
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 09:54:22PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:43:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> >Meanwhile, you've got a non-FHS directory on your system that is of no
>> >immediate use.
>>
>> Your later suggested /store as a user /
Hello,
First, thank to everyone for having responded.
I've read the list of window managers in Thomas Koch's email, and, as
said Serge, there are only a few tiling window managers in this list:
- Awesome requires programming skills
- Bluetile is for GNOME and there is no taskbar and no systra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iain Lane
* Package name: libpwquality
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 1996 Cristian Gafton
Copyright (c) 2011 Red Hat, Inc
Copyright (c) 2011 Tomas Mraz
Copyright
* Russ Allbery [120624 23:13]:
> When integrating with a build system that uses only one variable for
> compilation flags, just pass the concatenation of CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS into
> it. This is trivially done in debian/rules without modifying the upstream
> source.
Build systems not doing CPPFLAG
2012/6/24 Thomas Koch wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: "Mickaël Raybaud-Roig"
>>
>> * Package name: wmfs
>> Version : 2~beta201206
>> Upstream Author : Martin Duquesnoy
>> * URL : http://wmfs.info
>> * License : BSD
>> Programming Lang
On 25/06/12 06:07, YunQiang Su wrote:
> 1. upload 2.0 to experimental, and unstable users should install it manually.
This is usually the right answer: if version 1.0 is intended to go in
the next Debian release, it should get as much testing as possible,
which means it should be the default for u
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 08:36:13PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:42:33 +0200
> Arno Töll wrote:
>
> > On 24.06.2012 19:51, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Whatever happens, there is no place for yet another duplicate of
> > > packages which already have multiple duplicates in th
74 matches
Mail list logo
