Steve R. Petruzzello, 2012-06-25 13:51+0200: > the Debian Policy Manuel, and one can read (subsection 9.3.2 Writing the > scripts) that "These scripts should be named /etc/init.d/package". I failed to > find another reference to script naming in the rest of the document. > > So […] 2) some scripts are not named by > their package's name (hwclock.sh is part of the util-linux package).
About this specific point, while it is relevant to name scripts by the name of their package, I do not think it should be too strict. Such a recommendation exists to maintain a bit of order and to avoid conflicts. However, there are examples of scripts which have a logical name which is distinct from the name of their package, typically hwclock.sh. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo <xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu> <irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy> | `-' Debian Developer \_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/js9l85$sc$1...@dough.gmane.org
