Hi Russell
On 02/02/2012 03:21, Russell Coker wrote:
However, a low profile container/virtualization solution is needed, and I
know there is quite some demand for it: both some larger scale
organisations and several smaller/non-profit organisations I am acquainted
with use either OpenVZ or linux
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:52:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josselin did answer your question. To paraphrase my understanding of the
> answer: because he (they, probably, but he only spoke for himself) doesn't
> want to maintain those files because they duplicate information stored in
> anothe
> On do, 2012-02-02 at 12:18 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Whilte it may help the kernel team to not have to worry about problems
> > > in the grsec flavor when preparing uploads, preventing delays for the
> > > non-grsec images. But, that just push
Perhaps you should contact Julien Tinnes of http://kernelsec.cr0.org/
He has been too busy to work on the kernels lately but maybe he wants to
help.
On do, 2012-02-02 at 12:18 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, dann frazier wrote:
> > Whilte it may help the kernel team to not
+++ Andreas Tille [2012-02-01 09:56 +0100]:
> Hi Josselin,
>
> > To break such a chicken/egg circle, we
> > needed either to write the program ourselves, or to simply drop support
> > for the obsolete mime system.
>
> Somehow I missed an announcement that mime is obsolete and not supported
> in D
On Feb 02, Russell Coker wrote:
> Are there many users who need root containment but who won't have the
> resources to run Xen or KVM when the support for Squeeze ends?
Are there many users who like to waste resources (mostly RAM, here) for
no good reason?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descri
Hi,
I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:57:39AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 21:56 -0600, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
> > Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Moritz Naumann
wrote:
> So there are obvious issues with LXC as a container solution for Linux,
> such as lacking actual containment (for the root user), which defeat sits
> purpose in production environments as a linux-vserver or OpenVZ
> replacement.
>
> However, a low prof
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, dann frazier wrote:
> Whilte it may help the kernel team to not have to worry about problems
> in the grsec flavor when preparing uploads, preventing delays for the
> non-grsec images. But, that just pushes the coordination down a ways -
> for stable updates we would need to ad
Le Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:44:36PM +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
>
> Is it to complex to have a syntax that is similar to what the shell
> does? Two solutions pop into my mind. Please let me know, why these are
> not use. You can point me to previous discussions.
Hi Benjamin,
You can refer to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Tabbernuk
* Package name: esteid-browser-plugin
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Kalev Lember & others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/esteid/
* License : LGPL 2.1 and/or BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Descriptio
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:56 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> >> Yeah, both of those were among the other syntax proposals that were
> >> suggested, and I think one of them was in the document at one
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Moffitt
Package name: python-pbs
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Andrew Moffat
URL : http://www.example.org/
License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Execute shell commands as python fun
Benjamin Drung writes:
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>> Yeah, both of those were among the other syntax proposals that were
>> suggested, and I think one of them was in the document at one point.
>> Using backslash is probably the easiest, although it does make
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
>
> > Is it to complex to have a syntax that is similar to what the shell
> > does? Two solutions pop into my mind. Please let me know, why these are
> > not use. You can point me to previous discussions.
>
>
Andreas Tille writes:
> Could somebody please answer my implicite question why the mime files
> are removed before such a conversion tool exists and thus shamelessly
> are breaking applications that depend from it.
Josselin did answer your question. To paraphrase my understanding of the
answer:
Benjamin Drung writes:
> Is it to complex to have a syntax that is similar to what the shell
> does? Two solutions pop into my mind. Please let me know, why these are
> not use. You can point me to previous discussions.
> Idea 1: Use a escape sequence for specifying a whitespace (e.g. "\ " for
>
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 23:31 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Russ Allbery , 2012-02-01, 14:20:
> >>DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
> >>spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file
> >>one.bar" is licensed under ISC, but "foo/file_one.bar
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Tools like mutt, which need the extended mailcap syntax, can certainly
> continue to ship a mime file.
>
> If a package ships both a desktop and a mime file, the conversion-tool
> could simply skip the automatic generation of the
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:20 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
>
> > DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
> > spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file one.bar"
> > is licensed under ISC, but "foo/file_one.bar" is lice
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Tabbernuk
* Package name: qdigidoc
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Kalev Lember & others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/esteid/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C++
Description : QT-based Digidoc
Jakub Wilk writes:
> This one is representable. You can take advantage of the fact the "the
> last paragraph that matches a particular file applies to it":
> | Files: foo/file?one.bar
> | License: ISC
> |
> | Files: foo/file_one.bar
> | License: GPL
Oh, hey, yes, good point.
--
Russ Allbery (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Tabbernuk
* Package name: qesteidutil
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Kalev Lember & others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/esteid/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Estonian ID c
On 02/02/2012 03:37 AM, Moritz Naumann wrote:
> So there are obvious issues with LXC as a container solution for Linux, such
> as
> lacking actual containment (for the root user), which defeat sits purpose in
> production environments as a linux-vserver or OpenVZ replacement.
>
> However, a low p
* Russ Allbery , 2012-02-01, 14:20:
DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file
one.bar" is licensed under ISC, but "foo/file_one.bar" is licensed
under GPL. How can you do that?
No, that distinction isn'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Tabbernuk
* Package name: libdigidocpp
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Kalev Lember & others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/esteid/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Tabbernuk
* Package name: libdigidoc
Version : 2.7.0
Upstream Author : Kalev Lember & others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/esteid/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ library fo
Benjamin Drung writes:
> DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
> spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file one.bar"
> is licensed under ISC, but "foo/file_one.bar" is licensed under GPL. How
> can you do that?
No, that distinction isn't repres
Michael Biebl writes:
> On 01.02.2012 16:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Assuming that Russ did not overlooked something this means that mailcap
>> entries can not generatet from desktop files. So the one-liners
>> mentioned by Josselin which might solve 50% of the task could not
>> easily enhanced
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:04:50 -0600
with message-id <20120201220449.GA29599@burratino>
and subject line Re: general: can't configure Xorg in a new wheezy instalation
has caused the Debian Bug report #658292,
regarding general: can't configure Xorg in a new wheezy instalation
to be mar
trynewconfiguration are the messages in terminal
Xorg.0.log is the log of 'Xorg -configure'
trynewconfiguration
Description: Binary data
[ 3394.918]
X.Org X Server 1.11.3.901 (1.11.4 RC 1)
Release Date: 2012-01-06
[ 3394.918] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 3394.918] Build Operating System
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
What led up to the situation?
New instalation, I enter in Gnome3 and don't show correctly the desktop (can't
read text nor icons)
What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
I tried to find xorg.config but don't e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Falavigna
* Package name: pbs
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Andrew Moffat
* URL : https://github.com/amoffat/pbs
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python subprocess wrapper
PBS is a un
So there are obvious issues with LXC as a container solution for Linux, such as
lacking actual containment (for the root user), which defeat sits purpose in
production environments as a linux-vserver or OpenVZ replacement.
However, a low profile container/virtualization solution is needed, and I
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 06:41:43PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2012-02-01 at 14:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 14:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500,
Hi,
DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file one.bar"
is licensed under ISC, but "foo/file_one.bar" is licensed under GPL. How
can you do that?
I would like to write following:
File: "foo/file one.bar"
Li
On 01.02.2012 16:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:51:17AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The main place that mailcap is richer than the desktop file that I can see
>> is that mailcap allows you to express the exact command line (including
>> putting %s at different pla
Le Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:12:16AM +, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
>
> You're not the DEP5 driver
Hi Lars and everybody,
I am driving this DEP and re-listed myself at a driver to mark that fact.
To summarise:
- The original idea, from Sam Hocevar, was posted on this list on August 4,
2007.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:51:17AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> ...
I confirm that I agree that we should prevent duplication of data which
was stated in previous mails.
> The main place that mailcap is richer than the desktop file that I can see
> is that mailca
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > > > What is stopping you from creating
* Colin Watson [120201 12:32]:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > It's also a pity that it is not that easy to see which packages are in
> > this set. Given that transitively-essential means:
> >
> > - the package must be unpackaged manually
> > - it must work
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Chopin
* Package name: pylast
Version : 0.5.11
Upstream Author : Amr Hassan
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pylast/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python interface to Last.fm
On 01/31/2012 10:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> If anyone wishes to volunteer to maintain VServer in Debian - you are
> very welcome, but please start by addressing the bugs filed against
> them in squeeze and reviewing the existing conflicts. If you can
> prove yourself by doing that, then y
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> It's also a pity that it is not that easy to see which packages are in
> this set. Given that transitively-essential means:
>
> - the package must be unpackaged manually
> - it must work without any preinst or postinst script bein
Fixed in git, thanks!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On 12-02-01 at 11:18am, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alessio Treglia
>
> * Package name: meterec
> Version : 0.8
> Upstream Author : Fabric Lebas
> * URL : http://meterec.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Programmin
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Just to be clear, 'that work' is not just a matter of forwarding
> > messages back and forward between the Debian BTS and the Linux-VServer
> > developers. Unless the VServer project
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: meterec
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Fabric Lebas
* URL : http://meterec.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : minimalistic multi track recoder
me
* Steve Langasek [120131 20:53]:
> Well, I would argue that packages in the essential set shouldn't be adding
> new dependencies without some discussion and review on debian-devel first.
> That's not technically required by policy, but pulling new packages into the
> transitively-essential package
W dniu 31.01.2012 19:28, Wookey pisze:
+++ DrEagle [2012-01-25 14:58 +0100]:
What we need to accomplish is having a package to upload which will
build cross-toolchains. The significant change from buildcross is that
instead of using dpkg-cross to generate a libc6-dev-armel-cross package,
it sh
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 01:14 -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> The description and nametemplate don't come from the same place. Those
>> come from /usr/share/mime/application/pdf.xml, and are the same for all
>> application/pdf entries.
> That, and also you hav
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > > What is stopping you from creating another package, that provides the
> > > kernel with grsecurity patc
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > What is stopping you from creating another package, that provides the
> > kernel with grsecurity patches applied? Don't bother the kernel team
> > with it, and just mai
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 01:14 -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> The description and nametemplate don't come from the same place. Those
> come from /usr/share/mime/application/pdf.xml, and are the same for all
> application/pdf entries.
That, and also you have to take into account aliases (di
On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:26:50 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez
> wrote:
> > So I think it's perfectly clear that nor Debian nor Grsecurity are
> > really interested in Debian shipping a Grsecurity kernel.
>
> Well, I don't think its fair to say
Andreas Tille writes:
> Well, from my perspective I was bored the first time when xpdf came up
> when I was expecting evince. After purging xpdf I learned that see does
> not find any pdf viewer. Sorry if I did not realised any discussion
> seven monthes ago noch any one-line helpers.
> So wer
Hi Josselin,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:29:46AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 21:51 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > I agree that an automatic solution would be prefered. However, as long
> > as such someone does not stand up and write such a program removing
> >
Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 21:51 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I agree that an automatic solution would be prefered. However, as long
> as such someone does not stand up and write such a program removing
> existing solutions is .
The point is, no one will write such a program until we remove
60 matches
Mail list logo
