On 02/02/2012 03:37 AM, Moritz Naumann wrote: > So there are obvious issues with LXC as a container solution for Linux, such > as > lacking actual containment (for the root user), which defeat sits purpose in > production environments as a linux-vserver or OpenVZ replacement. > > However, a low profile container/virtualization solution is needed, and I know > there is quite some demand for it: both some larger scale organisations and > several smaller/non-profit organisations I am acquainted with use either > OpenVZ > or linux-vserver and some of them will be in trouble if there is no equivalent > and not at least a rough migration path. >
I know that containers and virtualization isn't the same, but since kernel 3.0 we have Xen included upstream, and KVM since a lot longer. > Right now, (not just) my hopes are that linux-vserver + openvz (or at least > one > of them) will continue to be available in wheezy for as long as no other > comparable options are available. > Unless someone wants to work on it and make it happen, it wont... (sorry for stating the obvious) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f29ba2a.2050...@goirand.fr
