Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ian Maclaine-cross"
* Package name: ttm
Version : 4.01
Upstream Author : Ian Hutchinson
* URL : https://tth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/tth/trunk
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C, lex
Description : TeX/LaT
JFYI.
Debian has been represented at the meeting by Enrico Zini (who has
blogged about various aspects of the meeting as well [1,2,3]) and David
Kalnischkies. In the end, quite some pieces of Debian technologies have
attracted interest and are on their way to be part of the proposed
solution. Well
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:19:32AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> First, tests run during a package build are good, but they do not
> ensure, for example, that the package as installed is working OK. I've
> been thinking that (also) providing tests to be run after the package is
> installed (and not on
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 19:50 +, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I've got a multi-boot system for which I maintain my own (Grub2)
> grub.cfg.
>
> I've got Debian Lenny, Debian Squeeze and Ubuntu partitions inside an
> encrypted LVM2 logical volume,
> a booting nicely.
>
> I just have to
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> Isn't that a non-issue (for now)?
>
> Here's my reasoning:
>
> 1) The non-free deb is only in apt if non-free is in sources.list.
> 2) AN earlier mail stated that the kernel recommends the non-free firmware
> deb.
[...]
Of c
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:46:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
> > Aren't ia32-libs on their way out, together with rest of the bi-arch stuff?
>
> Since sarge, yes. Nothing is as permanent as a quick temporary hack.
With no multiarch on horizon, there wasn't anythi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: node-xmpp
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Stephan Maka
* URL : https://github.com/astro/node-xmpp
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Node
Description : idiomatic XMPP library f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: node-expat
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Stephan Maka
* URL : https://github.com/astro/node-expat
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C++
Description : fast XML parser library
Hi there.
I've got a multi-boot system for which I maintain my own (Grub2) grub.cfg.
I've got Debian Lenny, Debian Squeeze and Ubuntu partitions inside an
encrypted LVM2 logical volume,
a booting nicely.
I just have to watch out if one of them tries to "update" grub.cfg,
completely trashing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
* Package name: libcpan-meta-yaml-perl
Version : 0.003
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Meta-YAML/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Rea
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Hendrik Sattler
wrote:
> Zitat von "Olaf van der Spek" :
>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Hendrik Sattler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW: KDE4 is a very good example for failure with modern filesystems. I
>>> regularly loose configuration files when suspend-to-ram fai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
* Package name: libperl-ostype-perl
Version : 1.002
Upstream Author : David Golden
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-OSType/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : map perl
Zitat von "Olaf van der Spek" :
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Hendrik Sattler
wrote:
BTW: KDE4 is a very good example for failure with modern filesystems. I
regularly loose configuration files when suspend-to-ram fails even if the
configuration of the running programs were not changed. Yay
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 15.01.2011, 10:29 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2011-01-15, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> > The best option to fix this issue I can see is if it was possible to do
> > binNMUs
> > for Arch: all packages. There are some options to workaround the fact that
> > we
>
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:44:02PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Adam Borowski writes:
>> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:49:17AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> >> Add lib32 packages for the deps.
>>
>> Actually you need ia32-libs-dev and also gcc-multilib when you COMP
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva writes:
> Hi Goswin.
>
> Excerpts from Goswin von Brederlow's message of Qua Jan 26 11:28:59 -0200
> 2011:
> (...)
>> But having some generated html files depend on the exact ghc version
>> seems extrem.
>
> Yes, I don't see the need of adding a Depends: field to -do
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Hendrik Sattler
wrote:
> BTW: KDE4 is a very good example for failure with modern filesystems. I
> regularly loose configuration files when suspend-to-ram fails even if the
> configuration of the running programs were not changed. Yay :-( And this is
> with XFS, no
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva writes ("Re: binNMU for Arch: all packages."):
> Excerpts from Goswin von Brederlow's message of Qua Jan 26 11:28:59 -0200
> 2011:
> (...)
> > But having some generated html files depend on the exact ghc version
> > seems extrem.
>
> Yes, I don't see the need of adding
Zitat von "Goswin von Brederlow" :
"Hendrik Sattler" writes:
Zitat von "Goswin von Brederlow" :
Adam Borowski writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:47:52 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
>
> > * Issues in specific packages
> >
> > We further discussed some specific problematic packages. One example is
> > ia32-libs, which is difficult because it includes 100+ other source
> > packages. This
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> typedef struct {
> int fd;
> char buffer[];
> } safe_t;
>
> or what do you mean by invalid C?
Zero length arrays are not valid C AFAIK.
--
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
"Hendrik Sattler" writes:
> Zitat von "Goswin von Brederlow" :
>
>> Adam Borowski writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
> is https://git
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> Isn't that a non-issue (for now)?
>
> Here's my reasoning:
>
> 1) The non-free deb is only in apt if non-free is in sources.list.
> 2) AN earlier mail stated that the kernel recommends the non-free
>firmware deb.
> 3) Recommends are to be installed by default.
>
> Shoul
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmodule-metadata-perl
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : David Golden ,
Ken Williams ,
Hi Goswin.
Excerpts from Goswin von Brederlow's message of Qua Jan 26 11:28:59 -0200 2011:
(...)
> But having some generated html files depend on the exact ghc version
> seems extrem.
Yes, I don't see the need of adding a Depends: field to -doc packages.
> So splitting out the version dependent
Zitat von "Goswin von Brederlow" :
Adam Borowski writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
> is https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite, and the actual code is a
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:44:02PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:49:17AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> Add lib32 packages for the deps.
>
> Actually you need ia32-libs-dev and also gcc-multilib when you COMPILE a
> 32bit package. ia32-lib
Thijs Kinkhorst writes:
> * Issues in specific packages
>
> We further discussed some specific problematic packages. One example is
> ia32-libs, which is difficult because it includes 100+ other source
> packages. This will be handled better for Squeeze: we'll have to ensure
> it's as up to date
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Shachar Shemesh writes:
>> > I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
>> > is https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite, and the actual code is at
>> > https://github.com/Sha
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> I think you are dead wrong there Ian. Even if every single program is
> dead right (and we know a lot aren't) that means every one of them has
> a safe file update function somewhere in it.
>
> A function doing exactly the same thing
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:23:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:52 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> > Le 15/01/2011 11:29, Philipp Kern a écrit :
>> > > Arch:all binNMUing will only work if you keep the invariant of
>> > > version(arch:al
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
Homepage: http://vamos.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/trac/undertaker
License: GPL-2 GPL-3+
Version: 1.0
Prograaming Language: C++
Package: undertaker
Description: static code analysis tool checking preproc
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:49:17AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>
>> > What is the recommended course of action for such a package?
>>
>> For now: build on a 32-bit system or in a 32-bit chroot.
>>
>> Other optio
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> typedef struct {
>> int fd;
>> char buffer[PATH_MAX];
>> } safe_t;
>
> Except, you can't rely on PATH_MAX on any modern system. It's defined in
> Linux headers to an arbitrary value to make old code compile, but for
> examp
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh writes:
> > I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
> > is https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite, and the actual code is at
> > https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite/blob/master/saf
Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> [Ben Hutchings]
>> I think the plan was that any firmware package that is available
>> during installation and that satisfies a firmware request will get
>> installed. However, I have not worked on this and I don't know what
>> has actually been implemented.
>
> At
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've promised to get a library out there, and here it is. The base URL
> is https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite, and the actual code is at
> https://github.com/Shachar/safewrite/blob/master/safewrite.c
>
> This is not a formal release just yet (plus one func
Ian Jackson writes:
> Shachar Shemesh writes ("Re: Safe file update library ready (sort of)"):
>> I'm sorry, it might be me, but I fail to see the overlap between the
>> functionalities of safewrite vs. userv. The premises for safewrite is
>> that a program wants to make sure data integrity is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Harl
* Package name: libfpdf-tpl-php
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Jan Slabon
* URL : http://www.setasign.de/products/pdf-php-solutions/fpdi/
* License : Apache License, Version 2.0
Programming Lang: PHP
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Harl
* Package name: libfpdi-php
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Jan Slabon
* URL : http://www.setasign.de/products/pdf-php-solutions/fpdi/
* License : Apache License, Version 2.0
Programming Lang: PHP
Descr
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:12:01 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> > There is always the option of either recruiting one of those
> > disappointed users to maintain the package, or doing it yourself.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'm already spending all of my
> proverbial Copious Free Time
Hi there!
Juliusz, it is better to point your question to the *maintainer* of the
package, not to debian-devel@ (which is not a mandatory mailing list for
all the maintainers). Adding the Debian Common Lisp team to the loop.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:25:19 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> It seems that
42 matches
Mail list logo
