Hi !
Le dimanche 18 juillet 2010 13:41:10, vous avez écrit :
> Something to consider for Squeeze + 1?
Agreed. Just like you it seems at some point the installation would use tools
like dpkg and install according to the priority.
Nowadays, a clear setting where we select the tip of the i
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, 10.06.2010 at 17:54:28 +0200, Bastian Blank
wrote:
> > My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
>
> If it's one, then I opt for 4.0.
I've got a few systems running Xen 4.0 now. It's working pretty well.
I've got one system where the l
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 04:45:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "brian m. carlson" writes:
>
> > The vi and nano debate was had a long time ago. So was the nvi versus
> > vim-tiny. It was decided that first-time users were not going to be
> > able to navigate vi, but experienced users would exp
"brian m. carlson" writes:
> The vi and nano debate was had a long time ago. So was the nvi versus
> vim-tiny. It was decided that first-time users were not going to be
> able to navigate vi, but experienced users would expect it. I don't
> know why people argued for vim-tiny over nvi; for a r
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:14:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Of those, aptitude and it's dependencies are not necessary (just nice
> to have sometimes), tasksel and dependencies should only be included
> when using D-I, whiptail and readline (and dependencies) are not always
> necessary, partic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: mothur
Version : 1.11.0
* URL : http://www.mothur.org
* License : unclear
Programming Lang: C
Description : sequence analysis suite for research on microbiota
Mothur seeks to develo
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:08:32 +0200
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:14:57PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:04:10 -0700
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > > Frans Pop writes:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we should consider changing the default prio for all
> > > >
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:16:49 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
apologies for this one being so long...
> Neil Williams writes:
>
> > It is very worthwhile having a clear division between Required and
> > Important. A typical bootstrap should include Required but there is
> > no need for any of the imp
Dear Fellows,
I wonder if anyone cron-ed fetching of popcons for derivative
distributions (e.g. Ubuntu). ubuntu exposes only current status
http://popcon.ubuntu.com/ and I've not found if there is any way obtain
historical data (like we have one available for DDs).
I am asking because we thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Goetze, 2010-07-19 18:05:
> May I suggest that this Package would be better named icedove-sieve?
You are right, I already changed the name[1] of the source package to
icedove-sieve. The binary package will be xul-ext-sieve.
[1] http://git.deb
]] Patrick Schoenfeld
| On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
| > What about /etc?
|
| Well, this one is easy: /etc *can not* be on its own partition.
| It has to be on the root filesystem so it will be available.
Nah, it just has to be mounted when init is s
Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: Priority dependence"):
> Calculating a dependency closure is neither an easy nor an task with
> a well-defined outcome. Starting with more data makes that both more
> easy and more likely to come to deterministic results (with a good
> enough starting set, most depende
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Priority dependence"):
> * Essential-only, usually only desirable in cases like build chroots.
> Doesn't use priority at all, but should just start from the essential
> packages and compute a dependency closure. This seems to be what the
> intention of Priority: req
Hi,
On 07/16/2010 09:44 PM, fladischermich...@fladi.at wrote:
* Package name: sieve
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Thomas Schmid
* URL : http://sieve.mozdev.org/
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: JavaScript, XUL
Description : Extension that i
* Peter Pentchev [100719 13:10]:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:41:54PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > The difference between optional and extra is indeed mood today. But I
> > guess that is mostly because dh_make is making everything optional
> > instead of extra by default...
>
> Uhm, I don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the ppp package.
The package is in an acceptable shape, but I need a lot of help with
bugs triaging and fixing.
The upstream maintainers are not exactly MIA, but they tend to ignore
patches and requests.
--
ciao,
Marco
signat
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:41:54PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Russ Allbery [100718 19:30]:
> > Ideally, it would be nice to be able to sort out packages by priority and,
> > from that, build, say, a CD set of only the important and higher packages
> > and know that it's self-contained. In
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:41:54PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> The difference between optional and extra is indeed mood today. But I
> guess that is mostly because dh_make is making everything optional
> instead of extra by default...
Most packages can be "optional", since they don't in
Hi,
I know that I'm a bit late...
On Thu, 10.06.2010 at 17:54:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
If it's one, then I opt for 4.0.
Thank you very much!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
* Russ Allbery [100718 19:30]:
> Ideally, it would be nice to be able to sort out packages by priority and,
> from that, build, say, a CD set of only the important and higher packages
> and know that it's self-contained. In practice, I suspect that we have
> enough packages with problems here tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: r-cran-outliers
Version : 0.13-2
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/outliers/index.html
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: R
Description : A collection of some tests comm
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> What about /etc?
Well, this one is easy: /etc *can not* be on its own partition.
It has to be on the root filesystem so it will be available.
Regards,
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi
On 07/19/2010 04:34 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>
>> Hello, Colleagues!
>>
>> The new service for tracking ABI changes in various C/C++ libraries is
>> now available for Linux distribution maintainers and upstream developers
>> - "Upstream Tracker". It may be hel
23 matches
Mail list logo
