>> The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble
>> are
>> interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of
>> "ownership" of Intellectual Property.
> Which is not only non-free in Debian, we can not distribute it.
> A software license is not
After digging for support for Razer Gaming Mice for the past year, I came
across a project that supports a number of Razer mice and and uses pyqt4 for
the interface. This is a great tool and as I have noticed not just the number
of Linux users growing but gamers whom use such mice, such as mysel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: open-gram-data
Version: 20100702-1
Upstream Author: Kefu Chai
Yong Sun
Wei Xue
Mike Qin
URL: http:/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: xsunpinyin
Version: 2.0.1
Upstream Autho : Lei Zhang
Ervin Yan
Yong Sun
Kefu Chai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ibus-sunpinyin
Version: 2.0.1
Upstream Autho : Lei Zhang
Ervin Yan
Yong Sun
Kefu Chai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jason Morawski
* Package name: shrinksafe
Version : 1.4.3
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://shrinksafe.dojotoolkit.org/
* License : MPL-1.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : JavaScript "compressio
"Christoph Anton Mitterer" wrote:
>Hi.
>
>
>WTF?!
>
>I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
>even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
>NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
>acceptet).
I trust ftp-masters w
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 621 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 143 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
On Fr, 02 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
> even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
> NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
> acceptet).
One more data point (
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Regarding the shutdown thingy... is there any chance that Debian would
> introduce kind of un-initramfs-images, in order to really unmount (not
> remount,ro) and then cleanly "close" all open block devices?
> Or do we have
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:56:50AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > Furthermore,
> > such restrictions are unenforcable under US copyright law
> But Debian is not (only) under US law.
This is true. That's why I said: "Copyright law may differ in other
countries." I'm just pointing out
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:45 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I believe there is precedent for this. I remember seeing a program
> under a license written entirely in Japanese. When translated by a DD
> fluent in Japanese, it was found to be a simple 3-clause BSD-style
> license which is entirely
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 00:39 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> The software is meant for non-free. Why it should be rejected? Even
> non-free stuff has to pass NEW for the first upload…
See points (1-4) from my original post, which are not change at all by
using non-free.
I mean even something like:
"Th
Am 02.07.2010 00:45, schrieb Russell Coker:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> 3) The license contains many places which can be considered
>> discriminatory, racist or fundamentalist.
>> Apart from that... religious stuff shouldn't go into a license.
>
> http://www.ojuba.org
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 2) How can the ftp-masters actually check whether this complies with the
> DFSG. As far as I can see from the English translation, it is not
> legally binding, and only the Arabic version is.
> I guess none of our ftp-maste
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 3) The license contains many places which can be considered
> discriminatory, racist or fundamentalist.
> Apart from that... religious stuff shouldn't go into a license.
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/waqf/license
The above URL has the license. I
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 00:34 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> There are also groups of people, which see porn as quite problematic at
> all, but we have got pornviewer e.g.. The software does not discrimate
> anyone, so why should we care about it?
Good argument...
The question however is,... who dec
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 1) I'm generally quite sceptical about putting religious stuff into
> Debian (regardless of which religion we're talking about). This simply
> opens the gates for so many problems, politically, morally, etc.
> Perhaps a sep
On 07/02/2010 12:34 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 02.07.2010 00:21, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>>
>> 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also
>> anti-European/anti-Western.
>
> IMHO I think it does not comply with the DFSG, but it is still in
> NEW and I trust the ftp
Hi.
I do not see how a event based initsystem would us actually help (but
perhaps I just don't understand it well enough).
I mean an event would be something like "mount root-fs" but then it
would be still completely open, on what to actually do for that.
I'm also do some thinking/planning on
Am 02.07.2010 00:21, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>
> 4) The license is extremely anti-American, and I guess also
> anti-European/anti-Western.
IMHO I think it does not comply with the DFSG, but it is still in NEW
and I trust the ftp-masters, that it will be rejected.
I don't see a reason t
Hi.
WTF?!
I really wonder how this (#579796), especially with such a license can
even be considered for going into Debian (especially seeing it in the
NEW queue yes I know, that this doesn't mean it has already been
acceptet).
1) I'm generally quite sceptical about putting religious stuff into
On 12163 March 1977, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> As announced that the end of April[0] we have dropped support for v3
> keys from the Debian keyring. At present this means debian-keyring.pgp
> still exists, but is an empty file. Once we have confirmation from DSA +
> FTP master that they have update
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: jist
Version : 1.10~beta
Upstream Author : Bennett Landman
* URL : http://www.nitrc.org/projects/jist/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: sugar-terminal-activity
Version : 28
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva
* URL : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Terminal_Activity
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Sug
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: José Manuel Santamaría Lema
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: screenie-qt
Version: 0
Upstream Author: Ariya Hidayat
URL: http://code.google.com/p/screenie/
License: GPLv2 or later
Description: fancy screenshot composer
Screenie a s
Neil Williams writes:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:45:20 +0200
> Alexandre Fournier wrote:
>
>> > Sometimes, from a user point of view, understanding why a package A
>> > recommends or suggests package B1 or B2 is not straightforward.
>> >
>> > It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: qt-simulator
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Nokia
* URL : http://labs.trolltech.com/page/Projects/Tools/QtSimulator
* License : LGPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : simulator f
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:08:02 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Okay, I propose once python-twitter package should be removed from testing.
> > If we're lucky :), it'll be in squeeze, again.
>
> You should probably file a RC bug so that it doesn’t migrate again
> without being fixed first.
Tha
It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to explain what
features are enabled in package A when installing package B1.
IMHO if the suggests isn't obvious, this should be part of the package
description. Something like "this package can also handle postscript
files if ghostscript is i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra
* Package name: qmf
Version : 1.0~2010w23
Upstream Author : Nokia Corporation
* URL : http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/messagingframework
* License : LGPL with exception or GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:45:20 +0200
Alexandre Fournier wrote:
> > Sometimes, from a user point of view, understanding why a package A
> > recommends or suggests package B1 or B2 is not straightforward.
> >
> > It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to explain what
> > features are enab
Hello everyone,
Goswin von Brederlow (I think he is an apt maintainer)
suggested to forward this wishlist bug report to debian-devel.
Best regards,
Alexandre Fournier
- Message Transféré -
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:44:23 +0200
De: Goswin von Brederlow
À: Alexandre Fournier
Cc: 58
Daniel Pittman writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>> Daniel Pittman writes:
>>> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
>
> [... waiting for enough devices to show up ...]
>
The only known solution today is to add a long delay during boot to try to
increase the ch
34 matches
Mail list logo
