Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2010-05-26 at 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > It is not about whether dash can handle it or not. The bashisms > don't come > > from autoconf, the come from what the author's added to > configure.in{,.in}. > > I beg to differ, at least some of them don't come from configure.*.

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2010-05-25 at 19:35 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > ./configure is a *generated* script too, if dash cannot handle it, dash > > has to be crippled to let the other packages continue working. Unless > > autoconf itself has already been patched to fix all of these issues when > > regenera

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Luk Claes
On 05/26/2010 08:05 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still feeling uneasy about this whole bash->dash thing. We sacrified > a lot of usability in the name of POSIX compliance (only a minority of > users care) and a few seconds spared during boot (who cares? I only boot > my laptop for kerne

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Peter Samuelson wrote: > And more false positives: > > possible bashism in ./configure line 44 ($BASH_SOMETHING): > if test -z "$BASH_VERSION$ZSH_VERSION" \ > && (test "X`print -r -- $as_echo`" = "X$as_echo") 2>/dev/null; then > possible bashism in ./configure line 367 (sh

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/05/10 at 23:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 > Raphael Geissert wrote: > > A much more sane list is in the bug report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=45;filename=failed-dash.txt;att=1;bug=582952 > > 124 source packages. Bad, but not

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I'm still feeling uneasy about this whole bash->dash thing. We sacrified a lot of usability in the name of POSIX compliance (only a minority of users care) and a few seconds spared during boot (who cares? I only boot my laptop for kernel upgrades). Was is really the right path to follow? Woul

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/26/2010 03:36 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: > That works for now; but if a package upgrade for extlinux is ever > downloaded, I'm afraid that new versions of the hook scripts will > be copied into these directories which are marked executable, and > my hand-made configuration file will get wiped

Re: Bug#582831: ITP: png2ico -- png2ico converts PNG files to Windows icon resource files.

2010-05-25 Thread Chris
On Wed, 26 May 2010 03:46:40 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 18:38:26 -0500, Chris Silva wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Chris Silva > > > > > > * Package name: png2ico > > Version : 12.08.02-1 > > Upstream Author : Matthia

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:10:38 -0400 (EDT), Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> ... I installed the mbr package ... > > The extlinux package itself also contains an mbr.bin, which you can use > (it's strong point is probably EBIOS support). So it does. Well, I've now installed extlinux

Re: Bug#582831: ITP: png2ico -- png2ico converts PNG files to Windows icon resource files.

2010-05-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 18:38:26 -0500, Chris Silva wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Chris Silva > > > * Package name: png2ico > Version : 12.08.02-1 > Upstream Author : Matthias S. Benkmann > * URL : http://www.winterdrache.de/freeware/png2ico

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, Given the recent responses I'm providing some more info, updates, and hints. Raphael Geissert wrote: > This doesn't necessarily mean that we are drowned by bashisms, as some of > those may already be fixed by Debian- provided packages or might affect > unused code s/packages/patches/ > (bef

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > It would also be good to build all the archive (or all the affected > packages) with and without LINENO support in dash, and then debdiff'ing > them and check if they are equal or not. A full archive rebuild was already done by Lucas (see the br against dash for de

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Tue, 25 May 2010 23:30:49 +0100 schrieb Stephen Gran : > adduser has had bugs filed in the past asking for uid to be equal to > gid by default, and I have so far rejected them as not worth the > complexity for the aesthetic pleasure of having numbers match. Is > there some problem with usernam

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >> 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file >> that >> corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and fix. The >> .dsc files contain checkbashisms' output. >

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Kurt Roeckx may or may not have written... > >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >>> 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file >>> that corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Tue, 25 May 2010 22:47:51 +0200 schrieb Harald Braumann : > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > > The > > path into your home directory is not restricted, just as the path > > others can take to ring your bell at home is not restricted. > > Depends on adduser

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 > Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> dash recently added support for the magic variable $LINENO, which was the >> last piece to make it POSIX compliant. However, this change made the >> autoconf- generated configure scripts use dash to execute

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/582952 >> > [2] http://people.debian.org/~geissert/source-bashisms/dd-list.txt >> >> That is just a list of all pa

Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread owens
> > > > Original Message >From: zlinux...@wowway.com >To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-u...@lists.debian.org, >debian-b...@lists.debian.org >Subject: Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test >grub2") >Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:00:45 -0400 (EDT) > >>On Tue, 25 May 2010

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:30:49PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Michael Banck said: > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > > 3) UID==GID was questioned to be a requrement, probably because it was > > >seen that it isn't be enforced, b

proper umask default setting / disabling UPGs / release notes / steps to take

2010-05-25 Thread C. Gatzemeier
The umask used to be (and should be again now) settable centrally. (/etc/login.defs or /etc/default/login LSB?) Setting the umask in /etc/profile and multiple other rc files (instead centrally in login.defs) was only necessary while pam_umask was not available, and to be depreciated. All the tim

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kurt Roeckx] > I get alot of them that have: > possible bashism in ./configure line 22 ($BASH_SOMETHING): > elif test -n "${BASH_VERSION+set}" && (set -o posix) >/dev/null 2>&1; then > possible bashism in ./configure line 147 ($BASH_SOMETHING): > $as_unset BASH_ENV || test "${BASH_EN

Software untuk Toko/Swalayan/Restoran/dll -- Gratis -- Terbatas -- Ayo Cepat Download !!

2010-05-25 Thread PT Asli Indonesia 2
Software AlfaPOS (Point of Sales) Software AlfaPOS sudah terbukti sukses diimplementasikan diberbagai jenis bisnis retail sejak tahun 2006. Bidang usaha yang wajib menggunakan AlfaPOS : - Swalayan/Minimarket/Supermarket - Toko Komputer/HP/Elektronik/Kelontong/ATK/Buku/Fotokopi - Toko Bangunan/Ke

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 25/05/10 23:13, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Normally I would process the results and file the bug reports myself but I > don't have and won't have time to do it any time soon. I've already tried to > find some time yesterday and today to work on checkbashisms to come up with > bug > fixes[4],

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file > > that > > corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and fix. The > > .dsc > >

Bug#583170: ITP: haskell-hsemail -- Haskell parser for email messages and SMTP conversations

2010-05-25 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Package name: haskell-hsemail Version: 1.6 Upstream Author: Peter Simons and others URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hsemail License: BSD D

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Kurt Roeckx may or may not have written... > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file >> that corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and fix. >> The .dsc files con

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Michael Banck said: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > > 3) UID==GID was questioned to be a requrement, probably because it was > >seen that it isn't be enforced, but it can be of great help if you > >are looking at a filesystem (

Bug#583169: ITP: haskell-sendfile -- Haskell portable sendfile library

2010-05-25 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Package name: haskell-sendfile Version: 0.6.1 Upstream Author: Matthew Elder URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/sendfile License: BSD Descrip

Re: Bug#581488: general: lower vm.swappiness by default for desktop installations

2010-05-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2010-05-25, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On 5/12/2010 1:22 PM, Marcus Better wrote: >> Recently I got the advice [1] to set vm.swappiness to 0, rather than >> the default 60. This improved things dramatically. Apparently Eclipse >> is no longer being swapped out preemptively all the time. The >> diff

Bug#583168: ITP: haskell-hsp -- Haskell library for writing dynamic server-side web pages

2010-05-25 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Package name: haskell-hsp Version: 0.5.2 Upstream Author: Joel Bjornson, Niklas Broberg URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hsp License: BSD De

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file that > corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and fix. The > .dsc > files contain checkbashisms' output. Is there some kind of doc

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:10:10PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 > Raphael Geissert wrote: > > A much more sane list is in the bug report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=45;filename=failed-dash.txt;att=1;bug=582952 > > 124 source packages

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 Raphael Geissert wrote: A much more sane list is in the bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=45;filename=failed-dash.txt;att=1;bug=582952 124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540. (I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 25/05/10 23:45, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > What about reverting this change in dash until after Squeeze is > released? Now seem like a bad time to make thousand of packages in > Debian fail to build from source. :) See bug #582952. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc file that > corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain, review and fix. The > .dsc > files contain checkbashisms' output. I get alot of them that have

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/582952 > > [2] http://people.debian.org/~geissert/source-bashisms/dd-list.txt > > That is just a list of all packages per person? It's li

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 Raphael Geissert wrote: > dash recently added support for the magic variable $LINENO, which was the > last > piece to make it POSIX compliant. However, this change made the autoconf- > generated configure scripts use dash to execute the script's code. Without

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:45:56 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > What about reverting this change in dash until after Squeeze is > released? Now seem like a bad time to make thousand of packages in > Debian fail to build from source. :) > That's the plan, see #582952. Cheers, Julien signa

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Frans Pop
> dash recently added support for the magic variable $LINENO, which was > the last piece to make it POSIX compliant. However, this change made the > autoconf- generated configure scripts use dash to execute the script's > code. Without support for LINENO, configure scripts exec to bash > automatica

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:13:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/582952 > [2] http://people.debian.org/~geissert/source-bashisms/dd-list.txt That is just a list of all packages per person? It's listing packages that have no shell script in it at all, and also don't h

Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Raphael Geissert] > Hi everyone, > > dash recently added support for the magic variable $LINENO, which > was the last piece to make it POSIX compliant. However, this change > made the autoconf- generated configure scripts use dash to execute > the script's code. Without support for LINENO, configu

Improving in-place upgrades of Ada packages from Lenny to Squeeze

2010-05-25 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Over the last two weeks I have been testing upgrades of Ada packages from Lenny to Sid and Squeeze in a chroot. The picture is not as pretty as it should be. In a nutshell, when you change /etc/apt/sources.list from lenny to squeeze (unstable, actually) and do "aptitude update", you end up with a

RFH: bashisms in configure script

2010-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi everyone, dash recently added support for the magic variable $LINENO, which was the last piece to make it POSIX compliant. However, this change made the autoconf- generated configure scripts use dash to execute the script's code. Without support for LINENO, configure scripts exec to bash auto

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > 3) UID==GID was questioned to be a requrement, probably because it was >seen that it isn't be enforced, but it can be of great help if you >are looking at a filesystem (removable drive) without knowing the >corresponding p

Re: The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread Harald Braumann
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > The > path into your home directory is not restricted, just as the path > others can take to ring your bell at home is not restricted. Depends on adduser settings. Both, world readable and private home directories are common. > Al

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Harald Braumann wrote on Tue, 25 May 2010: > > On simple standard system -- one disk, one kernel in /boot, no fancy > stuff -- it works quite well. This is enough to use grub2 for new installing of Debian. > On other systems it often breaks miserably. Updates leave my system > unbootable every

Bug#583157: ITP: haskell-gio -- Binding to the GIO

2010-05-25 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva" * Package name: haskell-gio Version : 0.11.0 Upstream Author : Peter Gavin, Andy Stewart * URL : http://www.haskell.org/gtk2hs/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Haskell Description :

The story behind UPG and umask.

2010-05-25 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Hi, am glad UPGs and the default umask finally got some momentum. Technical issues below. For anybody who has any doubt about UPGs or thinks it's insecure, here is a explanation snippet from [0]: ~ (This should be true, but still needs the fixes from bel

Re (3): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread peasthope
From: Stephen Powell Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:42:34 -0400 (EDT) > The backup people are Windows people, and they'd love an > excuse to complain to management about the backup requirements > of my Linux servers. Implies that you don't have responsibility for backing the Linux systems. Too b

Bug#583151: ITP: geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec -- Geronimo JSR-317 Java Persistence (JPA) 2.0 Spec API

2010-05-25 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation (ASF) * URL : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1/ * License : Ap

Browser's and Distro's (was: SWR Iron: Chromium without the data-mining)

2010-05-25 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Tue, 18 May 2010 22:36:56 +0200 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer : > Hi. > > AFAIK, even Chrome has disabled most tracking stuff per default > (except those things which FF/etc. do too). You may be raising a good point. As it is now: the first thing firefox seems to do when it's run, is to c

Re: Translations copyrights/licences

2010-05-25 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Helge Kreutzmann may or may not have written... > Speaking both with my translator and my Debian Maintainer hat on, I can > state the following: > a) There are lots of "drive by" translators. Systems like launchpad or >DDTP even *encourage* this. In this case, it is most likely

Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On Tue, 25 May 2010 12:03:17 -0400 (EDT), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> >> You're missing the point. The main selling point to management >> is that Linux is free. > > No software is entirely without cost. Free Software is no exception. There > are usually no up-fro

Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:51:11 -0400 (EDT), Mark > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: >> On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote: >>> Stephen Powell wrote: (3) The need for special backup requirements will be used by the opponents of Linux at my p

Bug#583133: ITP: haskell-glib -- Binding to the GLIB library for Gtk2Hs

2010-05-25 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva" * Package name: haskell-glib Version : 0.11.0 Upstream Author : Axel Simon, Duncan Coutts * URL : http://www.haskell.org/gtk2hs/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: Haskell Description

Re: Translations copyrights/licences

2010-05-25 Thread Julien Valroff
Le dimanche 23 mai 2010 à 09:01 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : > On Sun, 23 May 2010 07:53:14 +0200 > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > The sources contain gettext translations, the copyrights and licences > > of which are sometimes unclearly stated, eg: > > Nearly all packages with translations have

Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Mark
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote: > > Stephen Powell wrote: > >> (3) The need for special backup requirements will be > >> used by the opponents of Linux at my place of employment > >> to oppose further deployme

Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> (3) The need for special backup requirements will be >> used by the opponents of Linux at my place of employment >> to oppose further deployments of Linux, ... > > What about the carrot approach? Find an

Re: Upstream stopped to ship tar.gz file. What to do?

2010-05-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Artur R. Czechowski] > BTW, I'm doing also other changes in the package. So, changing the tarball > is not an only purpose of new package release. > > Pro: > To verify if tarball content is the same as upstream ones, one need > to fetch both tarballs, unpack them and verify the checksum of each

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Stephen Powell writes: > Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Stephen Powell writes: >>> >>> Both grub-legacy and grub-pc use sectors on the hard disk outside of >>> the master boot record and outside of a partition ... >> >> You may want to try extlinux, it works much like LILO in this respect. > > It doe

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:22:13AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: [snip] > Speaking of documentation, that seems to be its main weakness. > Documentation is sketchy and spread out over a number of different files. > I would have had a hard time configuring it if it weren't for > correct guesses bas

Re: Bug#581488: general: lower vm.swappiness by default for desktop installations

2010-05-25 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:59:45AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On 5/12/2010 1:22 PM, Marcus Better wrote: > > Recently I got the advice [1] to set vm.swappiness to 0, rather than > > the default 60. This improved things dramatically. Apparently Eclipse > > is no longer being swapped out preemptiv

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On Tue, 25 May 2010 07:08:20 -0400 (EDT), Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > William Pitcock wrote: >> This bug *can* be fixed, but not without a significant rewrite of the >> way that lilo's stage2 loader code works. Given that there is no >> active upstream and that the Debian lilo package carrie

Re: Upstream stopped to ship tar.gz file. What to do?

2010-05-25 Thread Russ Allbery
"Artur R. Czechowski" writes: > Upstream of imms stopped to ship tar.gz file and ships only tar.bz2. > However, there is no new upstream release at the moment. The question > is: Shall I prepare new release of Debian package using tar.bz2 > tarball? > There was a short discussion on #debian-dev

Re: Upstream stopped to ship tar.gz file. What to do?

2010-05-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > Upstream of imms stopped to ship tar.gz file and ships only tar.bz2. So they deleted existing tarballs and added new tar.bz2 tarballs? > However, there is no new upstream release at the moment. The question is: > Shall I prepare new

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Powell
Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Stephen Powell writes: >> >> Both grub-legacy and grub-pc use sectors on the hard disk outside of >> the master boot record and outside of a partition ... > > You may want to try extlinux, it works much like LILO in this respect. Well, I tried extlinux last night, and I am

Re: Bug#581488: general: lower vm.swappiness by default for desktop installations

2010-05-25 Thread Aaron Toponce
On 5/12/2010 1:22 PM, Marcus Better wrote: > Recently I got the advice [1] to set vm.swappiness to 0, rather than > the default 60. This improved things dramatically. Apparently Eclipse > is no longer being swapped out preemptively all the time. The > difference in perceived responsiveness is spect

Upstream stopped to ship tar.gz file. What to do?

2010-05-25 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Hello, Upstream of imms stopped to ship tar.gz file and ships only tar.bz2. However, there is no new upstream release at the moment. The question is: Shall I prepare new release of Debian package using tar.bz2 tarball? There was a short discussion on #debian-devel, but there was no conclusion. Po

Bug#583101: ITP: gtk2hs-buildtools -- Tools to build the Gtk2Hs suite of User Interface libraries

2010-05-25 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva" * Package name: gtk2hs-buildtools Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Axel Simon, Duncan Coutts, Manuel Chakravaty * URL : http://www.haskell.org/gtk2hs/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C,

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 05/23/2010 03:44 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Darren Salt wrote: > > Hi, > >> Working fine here on i386, whether booting a stock kernel (testing with >> 2.6.33 from experimental) or a custom kernel. I've not checked a stock kernel >> on amd64 for some time now, but I've seen no problem

Re: Bug#581488: general: lower vm.swappiness by default for desktop installations

2010-05-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 12 mai 2010 à 21:22 +0200, Marcus Better a écrit : > Recently I got the advice [1] to set vm.swappiness to 0, rather than > the default 60. This improved things dramatically. Apparently Eclipse > is no longer being swapped out preemptively all the time. The > difference in perceived res

Bug#583086: ITP: libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl -- Unicode-aware Catalyst plugin

2010-05-25 Thread Antony Gelberg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Antony Gelberg Package name: libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl Version : 1.0 Upstream Authors : Christian Hansen , Masahiro Chiba, Tomas Dorian URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding Lice

Re: Re: when to split a package into architecture: all and architecture: any halves

2010-05-25 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Personally I base my splitting on lintian's warning. The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data (over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package) in /usr/share but is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth since it m

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Chris Carr
On 25/05/2010 10:00, Harald Braumann wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:39:52PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: (4) Users need to test grub2 now. I've been using grub2 for quite some time now on several different systems with mixed success. [snip] Because of this, coupled with the many ope

Processed: Re: Bug#582968: running apps that have sound cause system to hang

2010-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 582968 general Bug #582968 [sound] running apps that have sound cause system to hang Warning: Unknown package 'sound' Bug reassigned from package 'sound' to 'general'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-25 Thread Harald Braumann
Hi, On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:39:52PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > (4) Users need to test grub2 now. I've been using grub2 for quite some time now on several different systems with mixed success. On simple standard system -- one disk, one kernel in /boot, no fancy stuff -- it works quite wel

Re: SRWare Iron: Chromium without the data-mining

2010-05-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 22 mai 2010 à 08:43 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : > | I don't see what you mean by "iffy" tabbed browsing, what's wrong with > | tabbed browsing in Epiphany? > > For me, at least two things: > > - C-TAB/C-S-TAB doesn't work for switching tabs, I have to use > C-PgUp/PgDn. This is