On 25/05/10 at 23:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500 > Raphael Geissert <[email protected]> wrote: > > A much more sane list is in the bug report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=45;filename=failed-dash.txt;att=1;bug=582952 > > 124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540. > > (I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-one-order-of-magnitude is a > stretch.)
No. 124 is the number of packages that failed to build. Not the number of source packages that silently generated incorrect binary packages. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
