Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)"
* Package name: lxde-icon-theme
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan)
* URL : http://lxde.org
* License : (LGPL)
Programming Lang: (etc.)
Description : LXDE Standard icon theme
Ben Finney writes:
> # Current version from Cheese Shop.
> opts="uversionmangle=s/-([a-z]+\d+)$/~$1/" \
> http://zhevny.com/specimen/files/specimen-(.+).tar.gz
Erm. Ignore the comment line; clearly I cut-and-paste from one of my own
packages and failed to edit the comment accordi
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> The upstream version number is 0.5.2-rc3 which is invalid for a
> non-native package
No, it's fine for the upstream version string to contain a hyphen. See
Debian policy §5.6.12., where the hyphen is explicitly listed as one of
the valid characters in the upstream v
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
>http://zhevny.com/specimen/files/specimen-0.5.2-rc3.tar.gz
Okay. The current list at http://zhevny.com/specimen/files/> shows
the following tarball files:
specimen-0.5.1.1.tar.gz
specimen-0.5.1.tar.gz
specimen-0.5.2-rc1.tar.gz
specimen-0.5.2-rc2.
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to write a debian/watch file for an upstream package which
> has a version number 1.2.3-rc4. For the debian package I need to drop
> the dash from the version number to give a debian version number of
> 1.2.3rc4.
>
> Any clues on how to do thi
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> I'm trying to write a debian/watch file for an upstream package which
> has a version number 1.2.3-rc4. For the debian package I need to drop
> the dash from the version number
Why do you need to drop the hyphen? A hyphen is perfectly valid in the
upstream version
Ben Finney wrote:
> For a start, you should replace the allows-empty match ‘(.*)’ with one
> that requires at least one character ‘(.+)’.
Noted. Thanks.
> Can you give us the full URL so that we can test our proposals before
> posting them?
http://zhevny.com/specimen/files/specimen-0.5.2-rc3
Erik de Castro Lopo writes:
> Any clues on how to do this? If I just use:
>
>package-(.*).tar.gz
For a start, you should replace the allows-empty match ‘(.*)’ with one
that requires at least one character ‘(.+)’.
That's orthogonal to the behaviour you're describing. though.
> uscan complai
El vie, 18-12-2009 a las 14:14 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo escribió:
> I'm trying to write a debian/watch file for an upstream package which
> has a version number 1.2.3-rc4. For the debian package I need to drop
> the dash from the version number to give a debian version number of
> 1.2.3rc4.
Hi
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> uscan complains that it can't find the current version (1.2.3rc4) on
> the server.
I'm currently doing:
version=3
opts=filenamemangle=s/-// \
http://example.com/files/ package-(.*).tar.gz
Erik
--
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a debian/watch file for an upstream package which
has a version number 1.2.3-rc4. For the debian package I need to drop
the dash from the version number to give a debian version number of
1.2.3rc4.
Any clues on how to do this? If I just use:
package-(.*).tar.gz
u
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 658 (new: 14)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 131 (new: 3)
Total number of packages reques
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:20 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Sebastian Otaegui (Sa 12 Dez 2009 22:26:56 CET):
> > Package: wnpp
> >
> > * Package name: lamson
>
> FYI, from the FAQ of lamson:
> http://lamsonproject.org/docs/faq.html
> ---
> Debian and CentOS are notorious for bei
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> FYI, from the FAQ of lamson:
> http://lamsonproject.org/docs/faq.html
> ---
> Debian and CentOS are notorious for being dinosaurs. Both distributions of
> Linux suffer from the false rationale that older software is more stable
> and
> secure. The reali
¿Quieres tu Boda en la Playa?
ODA Eventos y Bodaclick México te regalan la tornaboda
En ODA Eventos te lo organizamos todo.
ODA EVENTOS
Cancún y Riviera Maya
(998) 267 9783
odaeven...@didaskein.com
Conoce aquí sobre TU TORNABODA DE REGALO
http://clicks.skem1.com/v/?u=d83c9825f6fd48db896cb
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:24:48 +0100
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 17:40:55 Neil Williams wrote:
> > No. The package should simply exit cleanly with a successful return
> > value if perl does not exist, letting everything else proceed as
> > before. The postinst itself nee
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:07:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> With older versions of dpkg-dev, if quilt isn't already available,
> dpkg-source will use its own internal mechanism to apply the patch series,
> and that internal method did not maintain the .pc directory. If the
> patches are app
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Angel Abad
* Package name: python-django-dajaxice
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Benito Jorge Bastida
* URL : http://wiki.github.com/jorgebastida/dajaxice
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:56:29AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Given that the purpose of DEP-5 is to make information available to machines,
> my feeling is also that there is no need for a new field, unless there is a
> commitemnt to parse the license information about removed files in a
> prog
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.3
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:45:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
> > while checking the section 6.7.8.2 of the Developers reference
> > (“Repackaged upstream source”) in the context on another thread on this
> > list
> > (http://
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thibaut Paumard
* Package name: yorick-mira
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Éric Thiébaut
* URL :
http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/labo/perso/eric.thiebaut/mira.html
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Yorick
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thibaut Paumard
* Package name: yorick-optimpack
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Éric Thiébaut
* URL :
http://www-obs.univ-lyon1.fr/labo/perso/eric.thiebaut/optimpack.html
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C, Yoric
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmoosex-simpleconfig-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Brandon L. Black,
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-SimpleConfig/
* License : Perl (Artistic and GPL)
Description : MooseX::SimpleConfi
Will there be premade modules for the usual suspects? for example
Apache, INI, perl-hash, JSON, basic shell source, debcontrol/rfc-2822,
xml etc... Or is it meant that each package should reinvent the
wheel/copy-paste?
Also I think there should be a "simple mode", there the model is only
defined fo
On Thursday 17 December 2009 14:24:48 Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Unless somebeody complains, I will add this at the beginning of
> dh_config_model_upgrade:
>
> if ($ENV{DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS} =~ /noconfigmodel/) {
> warn "dh_config_model_upgrade: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS specifies
> 'noconfigmodel',
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Dominique Dumont
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 17:40:55 Neil Williams wrote:
>> No. The package should simply exit cleanly with a successful return
>> value if perl does not exist, letting everything else proceed as before.
>> The postinst itself needs to
Hello,
2009/12/17 Ben Hutchings :
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:03 +0100, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> 3. I feel your attitude isn't well suited for an Debian developer. Try
>> be more helpful instead of sounding like a dick.
>
> If this was the fi
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 17:40:55 Neil Williams wrote:
> No. The package should simply exit cleanly with a successful return
> value if perl does not exist, letting everything else proceed as before.
> The postinst itself needs to check - that way, Emdebian doesn't have to
> patch every packag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 561349 pam
Bug #561349 [general] otherr: login credentials aren't honoured
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'pam'.
> tags 561349 + unreproducible
Bug #561349 [pam] otherr: login credentials aren't honoured
Added tag(s) unreproduci
reassign 561349 pam
tags 561349 + unreproducible
thanks
On Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009, S.D.A. wrote:
> Care to elaborate?
Please attach the contents of /etc/pam* to this bug report.
thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le mercredi 16 décembre 2009 à 10:14 +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Dear Guillem and Olivier,
>
> yes, I have been pointed DOAP (and PackageMap) on the debian-qa and
> debian-mentors mailing lists. I have spent a couple of hours this week reading
> things about “Semantic web” and related thing
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> But if there are many people with interest in it to maintain, I think we could
> set up a team and work together.
Lets do it. I'm in.
(however, with having huge number of packages holding in my arm, I'll
be occasional uploader (until you
Hi Pablo,
On Wednesday 16 Dec 2009 13:49:18 Pablo Duboue wrote:
>
> RS> Probably we just host it on alioth and let interested parties
> contribute to RS> and use it.
>
> RS> Any suggestions on a different name ? Or should we just use the old one
> ?
>
> What about GCIDE2? And what about mergi
Package: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I am seriously concerned by the fake sense of security that such tool
provides (I must say that some other pam modules are scarry).
For instance, using vlock and libpam-alreadyloggedin on the same machine
provides the same
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: linuxsampler
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Christian Schoenebeck
* URL : http://www.linuxsampler.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : realtime audio sampl
35 matches
Mail list logo
