Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> FYI, from the FAQ of lamson:
> http://lamsonproject.org/docs/faq.html
> -------
>     Debian and CentOS are notorious for being dinosaurs. Both distributions of
>     Linux suffer from the false rationale that older software is more stable 
> and
>     secure. The reality is that the stability or security of a piece of 
> software is
>     not a function of its age, and in many cases the newer versions of 
> software
>     will typically fix many stability and performance problems. Despite this 
> fact,
>     these two variants of Linux are notorious for back-porting patches from 
> later
>     versions to older versions rather than just using the newer version.

Sounds like one wants to check with the upstream what their plan to handle
security issues is.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
                   ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to