On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:26:12PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Is there a policy document on how to give appropriate credit for the
> original work? What if the version we are going to upload is newer than
> what is in Ubuntu?
I share the view that the most appropriate way to give credit would
Quoting James Westby (jw+deb...@jameswestby.net):
> On Tue Dec 15 16:26:12 + 2009 Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just received a request to upload a series of packages for Debian that
> > are already available for Ubuntu.
> >
> > Is there a policy document on how to give appropri
Hello Clint,
On Tuesday 15 Dec 2009 23:43:45 Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:24:48PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > The copyright file lists that the copy of GCIDE is archived. I am not
> > very sure who the current upstream is and if this database is still
> > actively mainta
>> SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
>> The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
SG> This is isn't actually true
$ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |grep
X-Spam-Status
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.2 required=5.0
On Tue Dec 15 16:26:12 + 2009 Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just received a request to upload a series of packages for Debian that
> are already available for Ubuntu.
>
> Is there a policy document on how to give appropriate credit for the
> original work? What if the version we are g
Le Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Guillem Jover a écrit :
>
> Given that this is supposed to be upstream-only information, are you
> aware of DOAP [0]? It seems to me it would be better to reuse already
> existing infrastructure than to create yet a new one, that only a
> subset of Debian
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the
> NEW queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
> ‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
>
> Suspecting that it could have been o
Squeze will release with Python 2.5 and Python 2.6, while Python 2.4 is
scheduled for removal when no packages will depend on it. When Python
2.6 will enter unstable, Python 2.4 will be no longer supported version
for module and extension building.
We're proposing a MBF for the following packages
To Unsubscribe, please click here :
http://www.bustlists.com/12all/box.php?funcml=unsub2&nl=48&mi=2893&email=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 06:32:56PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > There have always been possible to have several versions of the same
> > binary package in the same suite (for different archit
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:50:43 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the NEW
> queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
> ‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
[...]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyo Lee
* Package name: librampart
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Afkham Azeez et al
* URL : http://ws.apache.org/rampart
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Apache Rampart/C is the secur
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
> The conclusion is that we should either change our policy on copyright
> documentation (that goes further than what is required by some licenses),
> or double-check our packages.
Whether or not these are actually the same files, I would have thou
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:24:48PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The copyright file lists that the copy of GCIDE is archived. I am not very
> sure
> who the current upstream is and if this database is still actively maintained.
It is not. Upstream abandoned GCIDE on the grounds that WordNet
Steffen:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Steffen Moeller
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just received a request to upload a series of packages for Debian that
> are already available for Ubuntu.
>
> Is there a policy document on how to give appropriate credit for the
> original work? What if the version
Hello,
I just received a request to upload a series of packages for Debian that
are already available for Ubuntu.
Is there a policy document on how to give appropriate credit for the
original work? What if the version we are going to upload is newer than
what is in Ubuntu?
I am of course strongl
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:50:43 +0900
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Suspecting that it could have been overlooked by many others, I had a look at
> source.debian.net and checked a couple of packages randomly.
>
> http://source.debian.net/source/search?&path=unzip.c
> http://source.debian.net/source/searc
After running apt-get update && apt-get -y dist-upgrade,
"apt-get" remove some package, i haven't noticed, include gdm.
now i can't login to X.
my system info:
amd64/unstable/testing
2.6.31-xx kernel
xfce4-xx
gdm
I don't remember my /etc/apt/source.list
deb http://ftp.debian.org/testing something
Dear all,
while reviewing an Ubuntu package that we are considering to submit to the NEW
queue for inclusion in Debian, I found a copy of source files from the
‘minizip’ package, that was not mentionned in debian/copyright.
Suspecting that it could have been overlooked by many others, I had a loo
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 06:32:56PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> There have always been possible to have several versions of the same
> binary package in the same suite (for different architectures) so this
> shouldn't come as a shock to anyone.
But in this case the different versions of one packa
Hi,
I have ITAed the package dict-gcide because I use it.
I don't have much idea about lexical databases (that being one of the reason
adopting it), so hope to gather some help here.
The copyright file lists that the copy of GCIDE is archived. I am not very sure
who the current upstream is and
Sebastian Otaegui (Sa 12 Dez 2009 22:26:56 CET):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sebastian Otaegui
>
>
> * Package name: lamson
> Version : 1.0pre7
> Upstream Author : Zed A. Shaw
> * URL : http://lamsonproject.org
> * License : GPL
> Programm
Sebastian Otaegui writes:
> Lamson's goal is to put an end to the hell that is "e-mail application
> development". Rather than stay stuck in the 1970s, Lamson adopts modern
> web application framework design and uses a proven scripting language
> (Python).
How about dropping all the breathless an
This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said:
> SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored.
> The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream.
This is isn't actually true, so the I've so far ignored the rest of your
mail.
Cheers,
--
-
[ Hint for next time: rather than Cc:-ing explicitly -devel, you should
X-Debbugs-Cc: it, that way the bug get forwarded to the list by the
BTS after the bug number is known. If you do otherwise, people would
not be able to post info to the bug log. ]
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:47:54PM -0430
25 matches
Mail list logo
