On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:00:22PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> There is also questions concerning why you would want to package
> something that has effectively a dead upstream, and many code flaws
> which could result in security issues in the future.
Uh? Since when is Unrealircd dead upstrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephan Peijnik
* Package name: py-sendfile
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Ben Woolley
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/py-sendfile
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : Python interfac
Rondal wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
>> block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
>
> I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
> see where it will block inclusion into Debian. About the licensing issues
> I alre
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
> just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
> themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
> Yesterday several pe
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 13:59 +0100, Rondal wrote:
> retitle 515134 ITP: ircservices-church -- IRC Services for IRC networks
> providing services like Nick- and ChanServ
>
> Hi,
>
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424844 .
> > Inclusion of ircservices in Debian may be pr
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:50 +0100, Rondal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > UnrealIRCd has many licensing and code-quality issues which would
> > block it's inclusion in a Debian release.
>
> I admit that the sourcecode is not of the highest quality, but I do not
> see where it will block inclusion into D
Attention, all maintainers of third-party debhelper commands. Sometime
in the next week or two, I plan to put dehelper 7.1.x in unstable. This
version, currently in experimental, has a significant change to its
command option parser, and a few[1] third-party commands need changes to
keep all the op
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Are there any concrete proposals for how to deal with this
systematically within debian without leaving GnuTLS users in lenny
perpetually gullible to MD5-based forgeries, or improperly-trusted V1
certificates?
Unless you want to "fix" openssl, Firefox, etc, Lenny u
ing version
> > numbers that are positive and less than 0 sometimes breaks tools.
>
> Given that I kept staring at your message thinking something just went
> wrong, I suppose somebody else might fall in that logic trap: How can
> something be "positive but not bigger than ze
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:11:04PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I'd like to suggest ithat you upload again to experimental, but having
> libode-dev Provide: libode0-dev. Then you ask reverse dependencies for
> feedback, in particular if they can be recompiled without any source
> change and cont
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:55:31PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 22:16 +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > I uploaded libode 0.11 in experimental. Can you please, test it with
> > your package and adjust your build dependency in order to able to build
> > it with libode-dev or
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:58:37PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du dimanche 15 février 2009, vers
> 22:49, je disais:
>
> After a second read, maybe this should be "libode-dev | libode0-dev". I
> thought that we should choose one.
That's was the idea.
>
Oh, and thanks for taking the initiative to contact your reverse
dependencies, it's appreciated.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A hacker does for love what other would not do fo
* Julien Cristau [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:55:31 +0100]:
> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 22:16 +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > I uploaded libode 0.11 in experimental. Can you please, test it with
> > your package and adjust your build dependency in order to able to build
> > it with libode-dev or libode0-de
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du dimanche 15 février 2009, vers
22:49, je disais:
>> I uploaded libode 0.11 in experimental. Can you please, test it with
>> your package and adjust your build dependency in order to able to build
>> it with libode-dev or libode0-dev.
After a second read,
OHURA Makoto wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: OHURA Makoto
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: pgfplots
> Version : 1.2
> Upstream Author : Christian Feuersanger
> * URL or Web page : http://pgfplots.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPLv3
> Description : TeX packa
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 22:16 +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> I uploaded libode 0.11 in experimental. Can you please, test it with
> your package and adjust your build dependency in order to able to build
> it with libode-dev or libode0-dev.
What's the point of changing the -dev package name, if yo
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du dimanche 15 février 2009, vers
22:16, Gonéri Le Bouder disait :
> I uploaded libode 0.11 in experimental. Can you please, test it with
> your package and adjust your build dependency in order to able to build
> it with libode-dev or libode0-dev.
> Please,
Hi,
I contact you because you maintain a package that depends on
libode0debian1.
xmoto
python-soya
xmoto
stormbaancoureur
qcake
python-soya
python-pyode
python-pyepl
mu-cade
libtaoframework-ode0.6-cil
libode0-dev
crystalspace
complearn-gui
I uploaded libode 0.11 in expe
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:50:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:09:11 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > blogging (1-203) life; title=FOSDEM videos released
> >
> > * In a nice coincedence with the release of Lenny (cheers!!1), the
> > [1 low-quality versions] of the vi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: lostlabyrinth-graphics
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Markus Doebele
* URL : http://www.lostlabyrinth.com/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: N/A
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: lostlabyrinth-sounds
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Markus Doebele
* URL : http://www.lostlabyrinth.com/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: N/A
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: lostlabyrinth
Version : 3.4.4
Upstream Author : Markus Doebele
* URL : http://www.lostlabyrinth.com/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: PureBasic
Description : dungeon crawling game
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:09:11 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> blogging (1-203) life; title=FOSDEM videos released
>
> * In a nice coincedence with the release of Lenny (cheers!!1), the
> [1 low-quality versions] of the videos from the [2 Debian DevRoom] at
> FOSDEM 2009 are available n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evgeni Golov
* Package name: elice
Version : 0.323
Upstream Author : Richard Braakman
* URL : http://clueonic.org/elice/archive/ (source only, no
information)
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:21 PM, wrote:
> * Sergei Golovan [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:52:42 +0300]:
>
>> Yes. Tk 8.5 (and 8.6) are fixed by upstream, and the fix is ported to
>> Tk 8.4 and 8.3. Though I don't know if another packages which ships
>> their own Tk copies (Tkinter, Perl-Tk) have this bug
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:35:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient.
> It's simply a MISTAKE that has been done by the last maintainer of yum,
> python-pyme is NOT the correct python package, python-gpgme is the right
> one. python
* Sergei Golovan [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:52:42 +0300]:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 14:07 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> >> I'd like to ask if there are plans to update x11proto-core to version
> >> 7.0.13 before lenny release?
> > I'm about to
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 14:07 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
>> I'd like to ask if there are plans to update x11proto-core to version
>> 7.0.13 before lenny release?
>
> I'm about to upload 7.0.14 to sid now. Is there a tk fix by now?
Yes. Tk
Philipp Kern wrote:
> I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient.
It's simply a MISTAKE that has been done by the last maintainer of yum,
python-pyme is NOT the correct python package, python-gpgme is the right
one. python-pyme is fully in python, while python-gpgme is written in C.
Maybe it wo
> I just enabled all cronjobs again and we also had a "dinstall" run
> again. In the nearly 27 hours the archive was disabled a neat 850MB of
> uploads happened.
Testing migration is also reactivated and back to normal (only running
twice a day at the moment, though).
In the first migration, a bi
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 14:07 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> I'd like to ask if there are plans to update x11proto-core to version
> 7.0.13 before lenny release?
I'm about to upload 7.0.14 to sid now. Is there a tk fix by now?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
On 02/13/2009 08:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
> just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
> themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
>
> Yesterday several people started to c
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:08:57PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Last before I stop annoying you with this issue: can I add an entry
> here, saying that yum shall be fixed?
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1
I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient. Anyway: there wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for a new maintainer for the source package gpscorrelate,
a tool to correlate digital photos with GPS data filling the relevant
EXIF fields.
The tool comes with a command line interface as well as a GUI, it is
implemented in C++, has a responsive maintai
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:49PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a
> user I miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency
> solver. Using APT in DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create
> some kind of problem, APT
reaks tools.
Given that I kept staring at your message thinking something just went
wrong, I suppose somebody else might fall in that logic trap: How can
something be "positive but not bigger than zero"? 0~20090215 is. Nice
math-breaking rules we had to introduce here :)
--
Gunnar Wolf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gvpe
Version : 2.22
Upstream Author : Marc Lehmann
* URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gvpe
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : creates a virtual ethernet between multiple endpoints
Luk Claes wrote:
>>> http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates
>> My question was more: what's the way to have a package uploaded in pu.
>> Should I write in a particular list? This one maybe?
>
> It's all mentioned on that page. If it's not clear, please tell me what
> part so we can update
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner
* Package name: libsyntax-highlight-engine-simple-languages-perl
Version : To be decided.
Upstream Author : Sugama Keita
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Simple/
* License : GP
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
first of all: you are aware that you hit the *worst* possible time of
sending that email when doing it on the *very* *evening* *when* *we*
*are* *actually* *really* *releasing*, especially when everyone knows
that the release is being made that evening.
second,
if you start seeing bugs or getting email about your packages where the
version string ends in em[0-9], or where dependencies mentioned by
reportbug include such a version suffix, the user is running one of the
two Emdebian distributions released alongside lenny (and based on lenny
packages). You m
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:34 +0100, sean finney wrote:
> hiya,
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:17:42 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >
> > > * Jonny Lamb [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:41:46 +]:
> > >
> > > > Version : 0.0.0+git+37ec
43 matches
Mail list logo
