On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:58:37PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du dimanche 15 février 2009, vers > 22:49, je disais: > > After a second read, maybe this should be "libode-dev | libode0-dev". I > thought that we should choose one. That's was the idea.
> > Which package should we use between libode-dev and libode0-dev? They
> > both provide /usr/lib/libode.a without being in conflict.
> This problem still remains.
Yes, sadly you're right. I'll fix that.
Best regards,
Gonéri
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
