Hi folks,
I'm attempting to solve bug #502140 in pam, which is marked as
release-critical for lenny. Unfortunately, the only ways to solve this all
involve fiddling around with preinsts of transitively essential packages, so
per Policy 3.5 I'm asking here about my proposed solution to add Pre-Dep
Hi,
I intend to adopt these for pkg-perl:
> * libtest-number-delta-perl
> libx11-freedesktop-desktopentry-perl
> libexporter-tidy-perl
> libextutils-depends-perl
> libextutils-pkgconfig-perl
>Misc perl libs. Should probably go to the perl group.
>
and these too:
> * libcairo-perl*
On Sunday 28 December 2008 12:30, "Всеволод Величко"
wrote:
> That message has been carbon-copied to debian-devel list. I'm not
> reading debian-women list. You think, this discussion should take
> place in d-d? I'm not sure.
Did Lisi's message go to the debian-devel list? If so I didn't receiv
Hello.
2008/12/28 Lisi Reisz :
> You would appear to be a man. If that is inaccurate, I apologise.
>
> But this is, as you point out, a _women's_ list. We have a right to
> discus what we choose to discuss. But I refute your allegation that
> this topic is idiotic. For those of us who are old
This one time, at band camp, Michael D. Norwick said:
> Amaya wrote:
> >Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> >
> > > Saying that, I'm glad there are women in Debian community,
> > > although I don't fully understand their effort to maintain a
> > > special "Debian Women" community. There is no "Debian Men"
> >
Amaya wrote:
Peter Tuhársky wrote:
Saying that, I'm glad there are women in Debian community, although I
don't fully understand their effort to maintain a special "Debian
Women" community. There is no "Debian Men" community I know of, and
Oh! Wait! What about the men!
I think you lac
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
De
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> Suppose the release managers decide that the division line you point
> out will, as of tomorrow, lie in a different place from where it is
> today (i.e. between a different neighbouring pair of severity
> levels). Suppose further that their reasoning for thi
On Sunday 28 December 2008 08:06, "Всеволод Величко"
wrote:
> > You are right, the images there might be offensive to you as a man.
> > I am not sorry for that, sorry :)
>
> Excuse me, you are against sexism, but what you mention is the same -
> from the opposite side. That's the same "women's" s
On Sunday 28 December 2008 09:24, "Sam Kuper" wrote:
> I think that if a Debian developer posted an off-topic message to the
> mailing list in which people from Saint Helena were talked about in a
> derogatory fashion, it would be reasonable for that to be regarded as
> discriminatory, especially
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner
X-Debugs-CC: este...@v7w.com, r...@debian.org, ani...@debian.org
* Package name: lp-solve-java
Version : 5.5.0.13
Upstream Author : Juergen Ebert
* URL : http://lpsolve.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
2008/12/27 Всеволод Величко :
> 2008/12/27 Amaya :
>> When I reflected upon my need for approval, I also found my answer to
>> the one million dollars question: Why are there so few women in
>> computing?
>> For me, the patriachy is an acceptable answer. Find your own, it is an
>> enlightment trip,
2008/12/27 Всеволод Величко :
> Excuse me, you are against sexism, but what you mention is the same -
> from the opposite side. That's the same "women's" sexism. If we should
> respect women's rights, may be women should do the same? Otherwise it
> looks very childish, sorry.
Something a lot of pe
Sorry me, community, I've missed first messages in the thread firstly.
I also hope, that this idiotic discussion will be closed soon.
--
Best wishes,
Velichko Vsevolod
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
Hello.
2008/12/27 Amaya :
> When I reflected upon my need for approval, I also found my answer to
> the one million dollars question: Why are there so few women in
> computing?
> For me, the patriachy is an acceptable answer. Find your own, it is an
> enlightment trip, and you do not need to aome
retitle 456924 O: libgstreamer-perl -- Perl interface to the gstreamer
noowner 456924
thanks
Heya,
In my quest to get rid of tasks I don't have the motivation to actually
work on, I want to give up some of my packages. Basically, there are
three groups: Packages that are just fine and need a main
Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> Saying that, I'm glad there are women in Debian community, although I
> don't fully understand their effort to maintain a special "Debian
> Women" community. There is no "Debian Men" community I know of, and
Oh! Wait! What about the men!
I think you lack some perspective.
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ben Finney writes:
>
> > So, it's not correct for anyone but a release manager to decide
> > “this bug is/is not release-critical, so I'll change the
> > severity”; that is a perversion of the meaning of the severity
> > field. You can argue about whether a bug fits the d
>> We already have these packages:
>> fdupes
>> perforate
> AFAIK, they do not replace files, they just find them.
Wrong, fdupe from perforate does link them together if one wants to.
> Imagine you have two backups, each on a different filesystem. Now you
> want to have them both on one file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soeren Sonnenburg
* Package name: coinor-cgl
Version : 0.53.1
Upstream Author : Robin Lougee-Heimer and Francois
Margot
* URL : http://www.coin-or.org/projects/Cgl.xml
* License : CPL
Programming Lang: C++
Descript
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> So, it's not correct for anyone but a release manager to decide
> “this bug is/is not release-critical, so I'll change the severity”;
> that is a perversion of the meaning of the severity field.
That's not quite true. See below.
> You can argue about wheth
21 matches
Mail list logo
