On 2008-12-20, schoappied wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
> and also learn more about it...
> Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially interested
> in software for making music...
Try contact the multimedia packaging t
schoappied, le Sat 20 Dec 2008 23:48:32 +0100, a écrit :
> Ok... What to do mean by 'fix bugs'? I think I'm able to build packages,
> but I'm not a software developer...
A lot of bugs are packaging issues.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Ben Finney wrote:
schoappied writes:
I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
and also learn more about it...
Thanks for your interest!
Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially
interested in software for making music...
O
Hi,
sorry for posting to this thread once more, permit me to get this off my
chest.
I apologize for the disgraceful lack of civility my posts to this thread
and I regret that it reduced your fun in Debian.
If you are inclined to do me a favor after all of this, please don't
reply to this message.
schoappied writes:
> I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
> and also learn more about it...
Thanks for your interest!
> Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially
> interested in software for making music...
One of the smoothest paths to imp
On 2008-12-20T21:17:27, schoappied wrote:
> I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
> and also learn more about it...
> Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially interested
> in software for making music...
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
/A
Hi,
I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
and also learn more about it...
Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially interested
in software for making music...
Regards,
\s
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:13:37PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:00:26PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:44:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > As to the people who emailed me that they are putting together a
> > > > petitio
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 09:12:46AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Or do you need to let of some steam here, because such behaviour is
> > > unacceptable on Ubuntu lists?
> > There's no ubuntu-legal list infested with leeches who think it's their
> > business to tell Ubuntu how to interpret its o
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible,
> please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard.
>
> The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular
> libXt
> in or
On 2008-12-20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> >> I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as "severe violation
>> >> of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required"
>> >> directive)". Debian policy 7.7 says:=20
>> >
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >> I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as "severe violation
> >> of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required"
> >> directive)". Debian policy 7.7 says:=20
> >> |Build-Depends, Build-Conflicts
> >> |
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible,
>> please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard.
>
> Just having made this choice w.r.t. to nsdejavu and pthread for properly
> fixing #504
[dropped even more CCs]
roucaries bastien wrote:
> It seems other plugins have the same problem. Should I open bug report?
Well, that depends a bit:
a) some of the symbols in your list (NS_*) might be from stuff that can
reasonably be expected to always linked into things loading the
plugins
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible,
> please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard.
> The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular
> libXt
> in order to adapt against different libXt version depending
Hi!
I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible,
please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard.
The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular
libXt
in order to adapt against different libXt version depending of the browser used.
The ques
Hi Mark;
Sounds very interesting. I'm not (yet) a member, but I guess the
pkg-phototools
team on alioth would welcome you
http://pkg-phototools.alioth.debian.org/
Since tehy already maintain e.g. hugin and panorama tools)
(I just wanted to beat KiBi to saying that :-)
d
(manual resen
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 41b0a520-c6c1-4e7b-8c49-74ee85faf242
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: Reaffirm the Social Contract
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]
> [ ] Choice 3: Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violat
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:12:48 + (UTC), Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Up to the etch release, I asked release people wether missing
> build-dependencies was release critical. They said no.
Ok, fine.
> I think I also have asked them in the last 6 months and got similar
> answer, but I'm not as sure abo
On 2008-12-20, David Paleino wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >trying to look at RC bugs, I just stumbled upon this one.
>> >IMHO it's not severity serious, since binary packages are built in clean
>> >chroots. Hence you don't have wx2.6 installed, but just the Build-Deps, =
> i.e.
>> >wx2.8.
>> >It's still "
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:04:13 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * David Paleino | 2008-12-19 22:58:07 [+0100]:
>
> >Hello,
> >trying to look at RC bugs, I just stumbled upon this one.
> >IMHO it's not severity serious, since binary packages are built in clean
> >chroots. Hence you don't ha
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:07:35PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2008 19:56, Johannes Wiedersich
> wrote:
> > What slightly upsets me about the issue is not what happened, but rather
> > that the French appear so arrogant as to think what happened on a world
> > wide announc
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:31:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:11:25AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > No, the problem is that certain of our French developers *think* that the
> > > rest of the world just doesn't understand their French humor and that
> > > something
On Friday 19 December 2008 19:56, Johannes Wiedersich
wrote:
> What slightly upsets me about the issue is not what happened, but rather
> that the French appear so arrogant as to think what happened on a world
> wide announcement is fine, just because the French think it is fine.
Do we have any
24 matches
Mail list logo
