On 2008-12-20, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> >> I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as "severe violation >> >> of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required" >> >> directive)". Debian policy 7.7 says:=20 >> >> |Build-Depends, Build-Conflicts >> >> | The Build-Depends and Build-Conflicts fields must be satisfied when >> >> |any of the following targets is invoked: build, clean, binary, >> >> |binary-arch, build-arch, build-indep and binary-indep. >> >> It does not mention a clean chroot. Afaik it also violates the policy if >> >> a packages build in fully installed chroot ist linked against >> >> more/different libraries than the same package build in a clean chroot. > >> Up to the etch release, I asked release people wether missing >> build-dependencies was release critical. They said no. > > Er, what?
Sorry. I was clearly trying to write build-conflicts, but failed. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
