Bug#507337: ITP: zoneclient -- Update DNS records kept by zoneedit.com as necessary

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Bone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: zoneclient Version : 0.60 Upstream Author : Kal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://zoneclient.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: Python Description :

Re: [php-maint] Bug#341420: marked as done (code in exts/dbase is not DFSG-free)

Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/11/2008): > 2008/11/29 Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Huh? We are in a permanent bugsquashing party, cause we want to > > release lenny. Still, coordination and communication matter. > Right, but it is a DFSG-freeness issue and those take time to >

Re: [php-maint] Bug#341420: marked as done (code in exts/dbase is not DFSG-free)

2008/11/29 Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > On Sunday 30 November 2008 00:56, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> > Closes: 341420 >> Do you mind at least contacting the maintainers? >> I find your upload very impolite. > > Huh? We are in a permanent bugsquashing party, cause we want to release

Re: [php-maint] Bug#341420: marked as done (code in exts/dbase is not DFSG-free)

Hi, On Sunday 30 November 2008 00:56, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Closes: 341420 > Do you mind at least contacting the maintainers? > I find your upload very impolite. Huh? We are in a permanent bugsquashing party, cause we want to release lenny. This is a RC bugs since three weeks, so I rather

Re: [php-maint] Bug#341420: marked as done (code in exts/dbase is not DFSG-free)

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [...] > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Debian PHP Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Description: [...] > Closes: 341420 > Changes: > php5 (5.2.6.dfsg.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * Non-maintainer upload. >

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Am 2008-11-28 15:42:34, schrieb William Pitcock: > I think issues like these call for an unsupported repository outside of > Debian, but publicized within the community as an unofficial repository > for things like qmail, packages unwanted in Debian proper for the time > being, etc.

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

On 11583 March 1977, Gerrit Pape wrote: As i got asked for the complete text of the rejection mail, as the thread start only had a partial quote, here it is. --88--- From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: netqmail_1.06-1_powerpc.

Back from the Dead...

Hi There! Posting again with GPG signature so that you know that it IS me... Just getting back into things after my father has died, and after starting my new degree studies in Masters of Dance Study. here at Otago University. My father had an 8 week battle with cancer before he went. I will b

Back from the Dead...

Hi There! Just getting back into things after my father has died, and after starting my new degree studies in Masters of Dance Study. here at Otago University. My father had an 8 week battle with cancer before he went. I will be getting new versions of my packages up in the next 2 weeks. I have

no answer for 495190

Hi, Is Jose Parrella MIA ? I did not get any answer at all from him since 15 Aug 2008 (and a reminder on 29 Oct 2008). Regards, Vincent -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unof

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > For completeness sake: QA does not thow out orphanes packages just for > being orphaned. If they are orphaned, RC-buggy, hardly used, and > alternatives are available, only then they are candidates for removal. You missed Debconf8's BoF I guess. > > Bast regards, > Bas

Bug#507294: ITP: librcc -- Library for autoconvert codepages

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: librcc Version: 0.2.6 Upstream Author: Suren A. Chilingaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/ License: GPLv2 Programming language: C Description: Library for autodection charset of ru

ITP: librcd -- Russian Charset Detection Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: librcd Version: 0.1.11 Upstream Author: Suren A. Chilingaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/ License: GPLv2 Programming language: C Description: Library for autodection charset of russian text signature.asc Description: Thi

Please help solve #504721

Bcc: debian-devel Hi, We have recently recognized that serial console detection in the installer is not working as expected, which resulted in RC bug http://bugs.debian.org/504721. If you have access to a machine through serial console, please provide debugging information which can help with

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Raphael Geissert dijo [Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:05:23PM -0600]: > William Pitcock wrote: > [...] > > > > The ideal way to handle this would be to have a single repository. PPAs > > solve a different problem, which is giving contributors and developers a > > playground to publish their in-progress p

Bug#507284: ITP: libxbean-java -- plugin based Java application server

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libxbean-java Version : 3.4.3 Upstream Author : David Blevins, Alan Cabrera, Hiram Chirino, Guillaume Nodet, Rob Davies, Aaron Mulder, James Strachan, Dain Sundstrom * URL : http

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

William Pitcock dijo [Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:57:37PM -0600]: > (...) > What I propose is something more along the lines of Gentoo's "sunrise" > overlay... a repository that anyone can get upload access to provided > that they understand basic Debian policy and have established that they > will be

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Miriam Ruiz dijo [Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:37:16AM +0100]: > > DDs would be discouraged from participating since they should be > > supporting packages/etc within Debian instead. > > I'm not exactly sure about this. I have quite a lot of packages that I > made for my own usage but I don't have time

Bug#507283: ITP: libgoogle-collections-java -- suite of collections and related goodies for Java 5.0

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libgoogle-collections-java Version : 0~20080808 Upstream Author : Kevin Bourrillion, Jared Levy, Mike Bostock, Jesse Wilson * URL : http://code.google.com/p/google-collections/ *

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo?

On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 23:01 -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Le Friday 28 November 2008 23:57:09 Holger Levsen, vous avez écrit : > >> On Friday 28 November 2008 22:42, William Pitcock wrote: > >>> I think issues like these c

Bug#507268: ITP: libsvn-hooks-perl -- framework for implementing subversion hooks

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Angel Abad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libsvn-hooks-perl Version : 0.12.477 Upstream Author : Gustavo Chaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/SVN-Hooks * License : Perl Programming Lang: P

Re: Game servers in /usr/games or /usr/sbin

Quoting Magnus Holmgren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Game executables should be installed in /usr/games, but what about game > servers that are designed to be long-running (in contrast to ones that just > manage a single game) and to run as a system daemon, and doesn't work if > executed by an ordinar

Game servers in /usr/games or /usr/sbin

Game executables should be installed in /usr/games, but what about game servers that are designed to be long-running (in contrast to ones that just manage a single game) and to run as a system daemon, and doesn't work if executed by an ordinary user? I don't think either Policy or the FHS mentio

Bug#507261: ITP: trac-authopenid -- OpenID authentication plugin for Trac

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeremy Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: trac-authopenid Version : 0.1.6 Upstream Author : Dalius Dobravolskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://trac.sandbox.lt/auth/wiki/AuthOpenIdPlugin * License : Trac license

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/11/2008): > Or > mentors.debian.net ? Source-only. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-29 13:22]: > > >> It isn't just about choosing not to install it, it causes work for the > >> various teams in Debian - security, release, QA.=20 > > We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't > > have a problem with qmail b

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

On 2008-11-29, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> It isn't just about choosing not to install it, it causes work for the >>> various teams in Debian - security, release, QA.=20 >> We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't >> have a problem with qmail being

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

>> It isn't just about choosing not to install it, it causes work for the >> various teams in Debian - security, release, QA.=20 > We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't > have a problem with qmail being included in Lenny. Are you aware that qmail and its related

Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

Hi Paul! You wrote: > basically the Debian answer to Ubuntu's universe. The main reason I > started thinking about this was that I got annoyed when QA folks chuck > orphaned packages (i've changed my mind about this since though). For completeness sake: QA does not thow out orphanes packages jus

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

Neil Williams wrote: > It isn't just about choosing not to install it, it causes work for the > various teams in Debian - security, release, QA.=20 We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't have a problem with qmail being included in Lenny. Cheers, Moritz -