Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 501590 general
Bug#501590: PrintScreen key causes many apps to suddenly die if you are running
in Linux text mode
Bug reassigned from package `console-data' to `general'.
> severity 501590 wishlist
Bug#501590: PrintScreen key causes many apps
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Depending on the requirements of ftp-master, which *seem* to think that
>> non-free were inappropriate for this kind of packages, my proposal tries
>> to address that by introducing a new archive section.
>>
>> I am aware that this is against our cur
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:26 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:02:17 +0200
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The page could have an "Expert" subpage (or let's name it kamikaze, so
> > people don't get impressed by the name ;)
>
> Do people really understand kamikaze
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:02:17 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The page could have an "Expert" subpage (or let's name it kamikaze, so
> people don't get impressed by the name ;)
Do people really understand kamikaze? :-)
# I don't know how many people know this Japanese word...
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our
> responsibilities or that we expose ourself to any kind of liability
> by distributing code that may or may not be patent-encumbered.
This is exactly my concern as well. I have absolutely
On Wed, Oct 08 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 04:37:26PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> So don't. Don't put any of the patent encumbered sources in main
>> either -- there is nothing that says patent infringement does not
>> happen as source code.
>>
>> Th
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our
> responsibilities
I've not seen anyone argue that it is, nor request that we do such
enforcement.
> or that we expose ourself to any kind of liability by distributing
> code that may or ma
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 04:37:26PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So don't. Don't put any of the patent encumbered sources in main
> either -- there is nothing that says patent infringement does not
> happen as source code.
>
> That would meet the current policy as well.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 08 2008, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:30:50PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> So I think we need to modify the proposal, not the policy.
>
> We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our
> responsibilities or that we expose ourself to any
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Wow, I'm on the top of list! ;)
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:28:51 +0200
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>naist-jdic
>
> Bug#500704 and #500748, Those bugs are fixed in unstable version, but I've
> waited fo
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:30:50PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So I think we need to modify the proposal, not the policy.
We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our
responsibilities or that we expose ourself to any kind of liability
by distributing code that may
On Wed, Oct 08 2008, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Do you see a particular problem with requiring that?
>>
>> Yes. I think main should remain self contained. This is the
>> same reason we have a contrib section -- packages in contrib can not
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I would be very uncomfortable trying to fill out something that specific.
> It looks remarkably like legal advice that I'm not qualified to give or
> judge.
I agree it looks like legal advice, and neither would I be capable of
handing out legal advice.
Wow, I'm on the top of list! ;)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:28:51 +0200
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>naist-jdic
Bug#500704 and #500748, Those bugs are fixed in unstable version, but I've
waited for bug reporter's comments (he uses o
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:07:54PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try4.
> > Hmm.. these packages are not available anymore?
> > URL changed?
> Your local Debian sid mirror, e.g. package
> xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xe
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:42:07 +0100
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > britney only considers installability, not buildability.
> Maybe it should - after all, in the phase prior to a release, the
I'm not sure whether b
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While we are at it, would be nice to have a section for DMCA-impaired software
> such as libdvdcss.
BTW, it's DMCA exemption time:
http://www.contentagenda.com/blog/150150/post/640034464.html
http://www.copyright.gov
Hi,
I was thinking whether not to mail this at all, or to -curiosa or to Gunnar,
but then, I think it's useful to spread the message how silly patents are...
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 21:13, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> For positive proof, I'd buy it - but we must remember logical
> fallacies can be de
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:13:32PM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with
> > apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them
> > has a bug about it, it's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gir-repository
Version : SVN
Upstream Author : Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20 matches
Mail list logo
