On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
> >> under debian/ that should be ignored (sinc
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
>> under debian/ that should be ignored (since they can't be deleted as part of
>> a diff); I'm afr
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> >
> > > It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go
> > > down
> > > this road, it will be des
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
> under debian/ that should be ignored (since they can't be deleted as part of
> a diff); I'm afraid I don't know the current state of this work and haven't
> heard of it being m
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:58:11PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug.
>
> > A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable.
>
> > I would like to request t
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:00:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> /me coughs in the direction of devscripts' Uploaders field (I'm assuming
> you'd noticed, but just in case :-)
:-)
> Assuming "not-POSIX-but-supported-by-policy" checkbashisms already has a
> flag to indicate whether "echo -n" sho
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
>> this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
>> package has commit access to the SVN repository.
>
> Even if this is the case, it is still annoying for NMUers to
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
> > this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
> > packa
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:19:54 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well I was told that this is also a bad idea, and a maintainer should
> not include those debian specific file directly in the upstream
> source.
> [Aim]
> So my question is: is this correct ?
> [Fire]
> If
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
> this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
> package has commit access to the SVN repository.
Even if this is the ca
* Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-24 23:19]:
> In take 3, I implemented entirely by hand all the proper debian files,
> as can be found here:
>
> http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gdcm/trunk/debian/
>
> [Ready]
>
> Well I was told that this is also a bad idea, and a main
Hello there, long time !
[Take 2 of 'Generating debian package using cmake' has been rated
PJ-13-crude language, so let's try to make a clean sequel]
In take 1, I was generating debian using cmake internal implementation
of debian package, which as most of you know, was doomed to failure
In tak
(sorry, most links below are in Italian :()
Hello all [1],
this year's Italian HackMeeting[2] (also known as HackIT), will be held in
Palermo [3]. This would be a great opportunity to me to have some signatures on
my GPG key, better if from some DD. As you might already know, from previous
mails t
"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> 3. I was suggested libopensync for cmake/debian package start.
>>> 3.1 where is the internal name 'libopensync1exp3' co
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:58:11PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug.
> A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable.
> I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to testing.
>
[Thomas Hood]
> I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to
> testing.
$ grep-excuses resolvconf
resolvconf (- to 1.41)
Maintainer: resolvconf maintainers
Too young, only 6 of 10 days old
Ignoring high urgency setting for NEW package
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I was approached by the maintainer of libmtp in Ubuntu regarding a fix for
LP#197968 [1]. The bug reporter cites the file /etc/udev/rules.d/README
(which does not exist in Debian), that says:
The udev daemon watches this directory with inotify so that changes to
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:34 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Supporting "local x" would be relatively simple; suggestions for a
> >> reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :)
> >
> > There was a fairly good
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Supporting "local x" would be relatively simple; suggestions for a
> > reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :)
>
> There was a fairly good one in Lintian that I took out once Po
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:19:49 +0200 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Francesco Poli
[...]
> | If you modify a GPG public key, you obtain something that no longer
> | corresponds to the original private key (obviously).
>
> No, the most common modification done to a GPG public key is adding a
> signatur
* Igshaan Mesias
| Hi
|
| > | On Jun 18, Igshaan Mesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > |
| > | > Description : The halockrun program provides a simple way to
| > | > implement locking in shell scripts.
| > |
| > | What does this offer over lockfile (procmail package) or dotlockfile
| > |
* Francesco Poli
| On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:54:09 -0600 Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
|
| [...]
| > Actually, how are debian-keyring and debian-archive-keyring free-software,
| > anyway? Do I get source code for the all GPG keys they contain?
|
| The most widely accepted definition of source code is
On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug.
A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable.
I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to testing.
Unfortunately I haven't received any responses to this request from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: gmlive
Version: 0.20.2
Upstream Author: lerosua, xihels, yetist, septeman
URL: http://code.google.com/p/gmlive/
License: GPLv2
De
brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> As far as I'm aware, there are three shells in Debian that can be used
> as /bin/sh: bash, dash, and posh[0].
>
{{b,d}a,{,pd,m}k,z,po}sh, with the 'only' 'problem' that ksh doesn't support
the local keyword, which is mandated by policy. Of course I don't think
anyon
Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Supporting "local x" would be relatively simple; suggestions for a
>> reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :)
>
> There was a fairly good one in Lintian that I took out once Policy blessed
> it, or at least we di
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Penny Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: buffycli
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Penny Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Buffycli is a command line alte
Hi, packages are available through
http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/sid.html
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Package: type-handling
> Well, that's the good-old type-handling, something we hoped we wouldn't
> need in 2008 anymore.
>
>
> Michael
I thought so too but I can't find any of the type-handling magic for
install time depends in dpkg. Only the buildti
Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 00:20 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> > Stop. Don't even try to go further. This is NOT the right way. Your
> > brand new wheels are going to drive you straight into a wall after way
> > too much effort.
>
> Please give such real world examples of failure (if they are
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:36:09PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > It probably should if all of the software or at least most (plus all of
> > the package installation software) supports them properly. Does it?
>
> No. The only support that dpkg has is that those arch-limitations are used
> by
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:20 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > Stop. Don't even try to go further. This is NOT the right way. Your
>> > brand new wheels are going to drive you straight into a wall after way
>> > too much
32 matches
Mail list logo
