The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 368 (new: 9)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 95 (new: 7)
Total number of packages requeste
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Sami Liedes wrote:
> I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a
> sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on
> numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done
> about it. Actually, most often oldstable-
[Please Cc: me in replies as I'm not on the list]
Hi,
I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a
sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on
numerous oldstable->stable upgrades, I thought something could be done
about it. Actually, most often oldstabl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:25:00AM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> There was no answer to this question in debian-user.
> Is this the appropriate list?
>
> I have these 5 bytes of machine code to disassemble.
>
> b8 12 00 cd 10
>
> I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> need a compl
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:48:23AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:34:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> I am beginning to come back from a deadline crunch on my day job, and
> >> start paying atten
Aquire Precsriptions and Medicaitons right now
www.addictartistry.bifreca.com
on armchairadulate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't sound good for me. Let's consider fglrx driver. I would like
> to stay tuned with fglrx from Debian package. But sometimes I have a
> problems running an OpenGL application. In such cases I use an flgrx
> directly from ATI to verify if
On måndagen den 28 januari 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 28/01/2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > ... which describes the _content_ of the tarball, but not the _name_
> > (or extension) of the tarball. So there is no clarification whether
> > to use 'dfsg', 'debian', 'ds' or something else in the
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[cut]
> > Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesystem to
> > remove them in maintainer's script on upgrade from previous version?
> I believe that's the case, although I'd like to g
PETER EASTHOPE skrev:
I have these 5 bytes of machine code to disassemble.
b8 12 00 cd 10
I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
need a complete object file. What tool can disassemble
this string?
If all else fails, decode it with your head, maybe? I probably would...
You're gi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:25:00AM -0700, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There was no answer to this question in debian-user.
> Is this the appropriate list?
>
> I have these 5 bytes of machine code to disassemble.
>
> b8 12 00 cd 10
>
> I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
> n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/08 11:18, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/20/08 10:46, brian m. carlson wrote:
>>> I think it's a good idea. I'm not a DD, but I don't appreciate getting
>>> dupe messages from th
Folk,
There was no answer to this question in debian-user.
Is this the appropriate list?
I have these 5 bytes of machine code to disassemble.
b8 12 00 cd 10
I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
need a complete object file. What tool can disassemble
this string?
Thanks,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/20/08 10:46, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea. I'm not a DD, but I don't appreciate getting
> > dupe messages from the list. procmail is not set up to handle them, and
> > I read the vast majority of the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/08 10:46, brian m. carlson wrote:
> [Ignoring the part of M-F-T that indicates Ben Finney, per his request.]
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:31:22AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:50:11AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> W
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:34:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I am beginning to come back from a deadline crunch on my day job, and
>> start paying attention to my Debian packages again; so hopefully the
>> state of SELinux i
Hi,
We've seen your website at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-icelandic/2006/09/msg00011.html
and we love it!
We see that your traffic rank is 5193
and your link popularity is 1845.
Also, you have been online since 3/10/1999.
With that kind of traffic, we will pay you up to $4,800/mont
[Ignoring the part of M-F-T that indicates Ben Finney, per his request.]
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:31:22AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:50:11AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
William, please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package name: josm-plugins
Version: undefined, all plugins have independent version numbers
Upstream Author: many authors, check them of URL below
URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:50:11AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> William, please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>; specifically,
> don't send me individual messages that are also sent to the list,
> since I didn't ask for them.
How ma
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:38:17PM +0900, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Le Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:05:05PM -0400, Joe Smith a écrit :
> > >On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > >>
> > >>apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
>
> > I will s
Package: netbase
Version: 4.29
Severity: wishlist
I would like to RFC about splitting /etc/network/interfaces to several
files ie. one file for each interface.
Something like /etc/network/interfaces.d/ with files eth0, wlan0, ppp0,
etc.
That would make easier to maintain machines with several (o
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > This is not needed:
> > - updating build-essential would update it for lenny/sid only
> > - only oldstable (sarge) has a dpkg version that doesn't support it
> >
> > Thus fixing build-essential doesn't fix it for the only case where it's
> > broken, whe
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixing build-essential does fix it at least for my case; my machine
> was partially-upgraded sarge. Is versioned dependency for preventing
> such stupidity?
I'm curious why you are using sarge? Any particular reason or
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:36:39 +0100,
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > According to the changelog, substvars source:Version is added in
> > dpkg-dev 1.13.19. A package which uses source:Version in its
> > debian/control and doesn't set its val
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am beginning to come back from a deadline crunch on my day
> job, and start paying attention to my Debian packages again; so
> hopefully the state of SELinux in Debian will improve -- at least, I'll
> try to be more reactive in the fu
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At some point in 2006, a serious flaw is addressed via a NMU, so
> it sits at 1.0+sarge1. I still cannot be bothered to take a look at
> the damn package. Time passes. In March 2008 it (again) shows it needs
> to be taken care of, and you kindly prepare a
27 matches
Mail list logo
