Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At some point in 2006, a serious flaw is addressed via a NMU, so
> it sits at 1.0+sarge1. I still cannot be bothered to take a look at
> the damn package. Time passes. In March 2008 it (again) shows it needs
> to be taken care of, and you kindly prepare a new NMU, properly
> labeling it 1.0+etch1.
>
> It gets rejected, as it is a lower version.

how about having it uploaded as 1.0+sarge1+etch1. looks funny, but
actually follows the policy that says to 'append' +etch1 to such uploads.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to