Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After further investigation, it looks like a lockfile created on a
> noatime (or relatime?) filesystem, without specifying L_PID, can
> never go stale. The problem is in lockfile_check().
It looks like procmail's lockfile doesn't have this problem since
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:04 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:40:45PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > > It is unclear to me what this software can do. Can I generate finite
> > > element models with it? Or is it just a way to start simulations on a
> > > backend? Can I v
Le Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:08:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>
> That is not the case when using featrure branches, the NMUer can
> get the information they need.
>
> But if you are a security NMUer, you have a short time frame,
Hi all,
actually, we as packagers have wr
> Unfortunately, I'm dumb when it comes at Python stuff, so, while I'd
> happily give some help, imagining to package this myself would be too
> ambitious...
I'll help out if there're Python problems.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
>> I updated it:
>> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-scicomp/eficas/trunk/debian/control?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
>> Is it ok for do you want me to develop this more ?
>
>> Description: ASter Command FIle Editor
> [.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: kmediafactory
Version: 0.6
Upstream Author: Petri Damstén
URL: http://aryhma.oy.cx/damu/software/kmediafactory/index.html
License: GPL
Description:
The coolest part abou
Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Description : pure-Python library built as a PDF toolkit
Very odd phrasing. Sounds backward: "PDF toolkit built as a
pure-Python library" makes more sense to me.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:33:23PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like Erlang still routinely fails to build on lebrun buildd
> (sparc architecture, dual UltraSparc III). Though the were some
> changes because instead of bus error
> (http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=erlang&
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-socksipy
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Dan Haim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://socksipy.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD style license
Description :
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, David Nusinow wrote:
> If those who make heavy use of usertags could get together and form
> some sort of consensus standard so that outsiders to the team could
> find out common information without having to hunt down the team's
> specific documentation, it'd help enormously.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pypdf
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Mathieu Fenniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pybrary.net/pyPdf/
* License : modified BSD license
Description :
On la, 2008-02-23 at 09:08 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > What might work quite well, however, is to have "bug janitors" (a la
> > kernel janitors) who look at new bugs that have received no attention
> > for, say, two weeks. If a b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcoat-persistent-perl
Version : 0.0._0.5
Upstream Author : Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Coat-Persistent/
* License : GPL, Artis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdbix-sequence-perl
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Benoit Beausejour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Sequence/
* License : GPL, Artistic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcoat-perl
Version : 0.1_0.6
Upstream Author : Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Coat/
* License : GPL, Artistic
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-buzhug
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Pierre Quentel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://buzhug.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD License
Description : pure-
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:08:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Now, you are trying to make me go towards a mechanism I think is
> inferior (a liner, dependent, and in my opinion, opaque, and somewhat
> shaky linear patch series) as opposed to pure, independent feature
> branches, fo
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:30:43PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Colin Watson: telegnome
> >
> > If there is a package you love in that list, it'd be _really_ great to
> > send patches to migrate them to gn
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:08:23PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Deng Xiyue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gstreamermm0.10
Version : 0.9.4
Upstream Author : José Alburquerque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Milosz Derezynski <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > That does not help me during an NMU from the source package.
>>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I updated it:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-scicomp/eficas/trunk/debian/control?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
> Is it ok for do you want me to develop this more ?
> Description: ASter Command FIle Editor
[...]
The long description looks
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:23:28PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Would it be possible to only re-order elements that were introduced by
> a variable substitution? That would make the list deterministic without
> changing what the maintainer wrote.
At best you could:
(a) sort substvar
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> What might work quite well, however, is to have "bug janitors" (a la
> kernel janitors) who look at new bugs that have received no attention
> for, say, two weeks. If a bug gets reported against a package, and the
> package maintaine
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:37:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is something that's been bugging me for a while now. As our
> > software packages get larger and larger, we need more people to take
> > them on. To do this, we need more people wil
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:50:00AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Be sure that somebody looks at new bugs.
> As days pass, the test conditions in the report e.g., URLs, deteriorate.
> As weeks pass, the user may have removed the package for another.
> As months pass, the user may no longer be wo
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:51:42AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 21 février 2008 à 23:31 -0600, John Goerzen a écrit :
> > 5) A way of sorting bugs by "hack on this first". Our priorities are not
> > necessarily this way. For instance, we may have a wishlist bug to package
> > the ne
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:19:14PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:31:32PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Excellent points made by both of you.
>
> > Here are some things that occur to me quickly:
>
> > 1) Large projects using $DVCS and making it easy for people that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > That does not help me during an NMU from the source package.
>
> For an NMU of one of my source packages, if you can't deal with
> the dis
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Colin Watson: telegnome
>
> If there is a package you love in that list, it'd be _really_ great to
> send patches to migrate them to gnome2/gtk2 libraries[0].
With the consent of the previous upstream maint
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 2/ debdiff uses wdiff to show changes on field values and wdiff gives
> spurious differences if the sole difference between both values is
> a different order. Thus debdiff output is more useful with ordered Depends
> fields.
(Probably stating the ob
Le samedi 23 février 2008 à 10:09 +0100, Guus Sliepen a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:41:05AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> > Upstream Author : EDF / R&D
>
> Please include the full name of the author(s).
Many people worked on this project. It is very hard to know.
> > Descriptio
On 23/02/2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sat Feb 23 12:02, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > So, I want to build against the reference lapack and blas, and then,
> > if the user chooses, then I want the alternatives system to enable the
> > use of atlas. Now, the new dpkg-source reordering installs atl
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 08:50:37PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > No, Sergei is right. The order of packages within ${shlibs:Depends} is not
> > defined, you're not completely avoiding the problem by reverting the
> >
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:41:05AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Upstream Author : EDF / R&D
Please include the full name of the author(s).
> Description : ASter Command FIle Editor
>
> This package provides an application to help to create Code Aster
> command files.
> Code Aster
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:40:45PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Why is it called astk? I can't find an astk tarball on the
> > www.code-aster.org site.
>
> astk is one of the tarballs in the aster-full-src-9.2.0-2.noarch.tar.gz
> tarball on the site. They distribute sixteen .tar.gz tarball
On ven, 2008-02-22 at 21:55 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > What please is the benefit of unnecessarily reordering dependencies
> > and leaving everyone on tenterhooks as to whether it will change
> > installation outcomes? (If this has already been explai
On mer, 2008-02-20 at 11:10 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:56:05AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I really, really hope it's implementing in some incredibly novel way
> > that doesn't involve having secret keys on the webserver (channeling
> > Manoj) or *even* network ac
38 matches
Mail list logo
