On 21/08/07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Because britney had been OOMing over the past few days, so this
> information within packages.qa.d.o was not being updated.
Oh! Thanks for the information.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600036
-
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:35:40AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On 21/08/07, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > OK, so that's clear. But I still have one doubt. Is it that it is not
> > necessary that Britney moves my packages into testing _exactly_ on the
> > tenth bug-free day, or is any day _after_ that
On 21/08/07, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> OK, so that's clear. But I still have one doubt. Is it that it is not
> necessary that Britney moves my packages into testing _exactly_ on the
> tenth bug-free day, or is any day _after_ that 10th day?
To elaborate on my day-counting complaint, see the status of
On 21/08/07, Don Armstrong wrote:
> google-sitemapgen, pkpgcounter and harvestman should be going in today.
Ah, thanks!
> In general,
> http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> clicking on "more" should tell you what is going on with a particular
> package's testing migration.
OK, so that's
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:00:51 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, I thought some of you may be aware that I have developed some
> commit hooks for Darcs and Mercurial. These hooks look for special
> strings in your commit logs. You can give a string to notify the bug
> of the com
Quoting Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You appear to be conflating a few different things here.
Yes, the initial statement was intended to be separate from the
paragraph after.
As far as the set that's appropriate for medium-memory users, that's
really a user specific thing; what c
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications?
Because the people who use Debian need different sets of applications.
> It doesn't, it is nice to have them available though. It may depend
> upon one perception of sluggish. I find Fedora
Why does the Debian distribution need so many applications? It
doesn't, it is nice to have them available though.
It may depend upon one perception of sluggish. I find Fedora's Gnome
desktop to be sluggish on an ATHLON 2000 XP. I tried Ubuntu with XFCE
and while the desktop loaded fine comm
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> I've just observed that though some of my packages have been in
> unstable for 10 days without complaints, Britney hasn't moved them
> into testing. Moreover, the PTS page has stopped counting the days
> my packages have spent in unstable since the 18th (
Dear Debian developers,
I've just observed that though some of my packages have been in
unstable for 10 days without complaints, Britney hasn't moved them
into testing. Moreover, the PTS page has stopped counting the days my
packages have spent in unstable since the 18th (I think). Is there
someth
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ski
Version : 1.1.3
* URL : http://ski.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : A simulator for the Itanium architecture
Ski is an instruction simulator designed t
On 8/20/07, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that the homepage of a software might change but I really think
> that the homepage changes much less frequently as the version of the
> package which makes the change of the homepage a managable issue in
> normal package maintainance
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:20 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the best method or best tool to determine the memory usage
> of an application? I have been gathering rough estimates from top.
"ps -C $command v" will give you a snapshot for the given command.
For X clients, you also need
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 17:11 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
> looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
> communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
> pretty nice. I have already done a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:53:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 20-Aug-07, 11:58 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:29:55PM +0200, Gonsolo wrote:
> > > > Would it be feasible to add something like a package cache to
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20-Aug-07, 11:58 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:29:55PM +0200, Gonsolo wrote:
> > > Would it be feasible to add something like a package cache to
> > > Debian?
> >
> > apt-proxy ?
>
> No, that builds a local mirror
Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> This utility is similar to the famous md5sum, but has the ability to
> recurse into subdirectories when calculating hashes for many files.
Could this not go into moreutils?
It seems a shame to create a new package for something that could be
trivially implemented in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scrapbook
Version : 1.2.0.8
Upstream Author : Gomita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://amb.vis.ne.jp/mozilla/scrapbook/
* License : MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1
Programming La
What is the best method or best tool to determine the memory usage
of an application? I have been gathering rough estimates from top.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:36:46 +0200
José "L. Redrejo" Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been unable to get a response from him for 5 months now, and his
> > last upload was an RC bug fix a year ago (before that, his last upload
> > was in 2005).
> >
>
> mmm, checking at
> http://qa.de
I had considered releasing an extra-light version as well but it
seemed several other distros had that covered and it would be too much
to try to maintain too many different versions. Is it needed?
I suppose everyone has a different idea of what is functional as an
OS on older hardware. I h
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> And even in this case, I still see as not harmful proceeding to fix the
> packages which are not using dh_md5sums atm.
I agree.
> One of the reason is that no one yet showed code implementing this in
> dpkg
#155676 actually
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
El lun, 20-08-2007 a las 14:04 -0700, Cameron Dale escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to reach Ricardo Cardenes (rcardenes) for a while
> now, and not gotten any response. Does anyone know if he's MIA?
>
As far as I know he is not MIA. In fact, he was at Debconf in Edinburgh
and I have contact
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 04:47:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd opt for dpkg generating the checksums upon _extracting_ the .deb
> > file. We already claim that the md5sums file isn't supposed to be any
> > kind of security thing. Why bother
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:04:39PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Russ Allbery]
> > While it's not the be-all and end-all of security, other OS vendors
> > (Sun in particular) have found it useful to make available a central
> > database of MD5 checksums of known-good versions of various binar
I would expect a smaller package list would help in that respect.
But one of the issues people on debian-user have mentioned on low-memory
(and low cpu) hardware is the long wait for apt-get and friends to run
(if at all).
-Kev
[0] This machine has no floppy support, no network, no cdrom, no us
I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
pretty nice. I have already done a bit of research on what
applications similar distributions are usin
Hi,
I've been trying to reach Ricardo Cardenes (rcardenes) for a while
now, and not gotten any response. Does anyone know if he's MIA?
I've been unable to get a response from him for 5 months now, and his
last upload was an RC bug fix a year ago (before that, his last upload
was in 2005).
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
> have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
> available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
> have used IceWM
On 20-Aug-07, 11:58 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:29:55PM +0200, Gonsolo wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Would it be feasible to add something like a package cache to Debian?
>
> apt-proxy ?
No, that builds a local mirror of packages being used on a site, so that
if you're
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 07:29:55PM +0200, Gonsolo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Would it be feasible to add something like a package cache to Debian?
apt-proxy ?
Regards,
Paddy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 18.08.2007 at 19:29:55 +0200, Gonsolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know disk space is cheap but having hundreds of megabytes wasted for
> gnome pixmaps I never see or fonts i never use is annoying.
I find the implications of your proposal MUCH more annoying:
* Joe User has to be perm
I do have this ability. I am lacking in the programming skills
needed for the packaging and bug fixing. I can read most code and make
some small changes, but my programming skills are mainly in C# and a
little Java. I know just enough C++ to be dangerous.
Quoting Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 438885 with 367764
Bug number 367764 not found. (Is it archived?)
Unknown blocking bug/s: 367764.
Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Was blocked by: 341413 341415 348259 348263 353660 367722 367725 367727 367729
367730 367731 3677
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 438885 Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Bug#438885: Mass bug filling: must use invoke-rc.d
Changed Bug title to `Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d' from `Mass bug
filling: must use invoke-rc.d'.
> owner 438885 Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL P
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
* Package name : libdpkg-parse-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Adam Jacob <|[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~holoway/DPKG-Parse-0.01/
* Lic
If you do not know what applications are on which CD, or even what you
need it becomes a little more difficult. I am trying to make it a
little easier for these
persons. I just went through all of this trying to install IceWM on an
older machine, so I thought to try to make it a little easier
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
>>> * Package name : libdpkg-parse-perl
>>> Version : 0.01
>>> Upstream Author : Adam Jacob <|[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> |* URL :
>>> http://search.cpan.org/~holoway/DPKG-Parse-0.01/
>>> * License
Package: general
Severity: serious
As of Debian Policy Manual version 3.7.2, the use of invoke-rc.d to
run init.d scripts has been made mandatory. Earlier, its use was
strongly recommended.
In most cases the fix should be simple, replace this:
/etc/init.d/package
with this:
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Deepak,
Please make sure you use the "X-Debbugs-CC:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org" pseudo-header when you file ITP bugs. See
DevRef 5.1. The easiest way to do this is to use the report bug utility.
Next time run "reportbug w
Hello!
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:05:54 +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> I was thinking about this field, and "Homepage" sounds a bit
> ambiguous in my ear.
Not in mine.
> I would suggest changing it to "Upstream" instead.
No, please. "Upstream" could be more than "Homepage",
e.g. "repository", "m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-c3-componentised-perl
Version : 1.0001
Upstream Author : Matt S. Trout and the DBIx::Class team
Pulled out into seperate module by Ash Berlin <[E
Guillem Jover wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
> binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
> I could change it to override the source stanza field.
I have one.
OpenOffice.orgs homepage is www.openoffice.org. Now, since 2.3,
Will it be possible to have more than one homepage listed, comma-separated?
Miry
2007/8/20, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Ok, just pushed the H
On 8/20/07, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> > > as that was what was
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> > as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
> > on the ps
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdigest-md5-file-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Author : Daniel Muey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dmuey/
* License : same as Perl (either Artistic or
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
I suggest that the homepage does not belong inside the package at all
(because it can change separately to the package)
I agree that the homepage of a software might change but I really think
that the homepage changes much less frequently as the version of
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly I do not think I have the
ability, patience, or time to be packaging software for Debian and dealing
with bugs I cannot correct.
What lets you assume you will have ability, patience, or time to maintain
a separate repository if you even d
49 matches
Mail list logo
