Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> generating dependencies on shared libraries. The system should have
> historical knowledges of symbols exporte
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 02:13:47AM +0200, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 01:53, David Nusinow wrote:
> > The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is
> > that it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
>
> Yes, a complete redesig
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:04:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > > Hello,
>
> > > in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy
> So make the www repo writable by group Debian just like debian-glibc CVS
> used to be.
That sounds to be a fair suggestion. I suppose that changes are
posted somewhere (debian-www?) so "accidents" should be easy to
avoid/revert.
What would be the risks? A commit/revert war like the one we rec
Le Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:44:56AM +0930, Ron a écrit :
>
> offer any proof that we can transition to this release
> without major breakage in an important application.
Dear Ron,
I am member of a team which is Maintainer: of a package using wxWidgets.
I would be happy to test it against an exper
> The wiki is completely centered on English and therefore fails to serve a
> significant portion of our users. Sure, parts of the wiki are translated,
> but maintenance of that is an orders of magnitude worse problem than it
> is for the website.
>
> As far as I'm concerned the wiki is not a v
On Sunday 27 May 2007 01:53, David Nusinow wrote:
> The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is
> that it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
Yes, a complete redesign of the website is a herculean task, but
contributing to specific pages or parts is tri
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:11:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> What you fail to see is that there is not really such a thing as the www
> team. Basically there are a bunch of people with commit access who all
> mostly just care about a particular part of the website.
> For some this is the technica
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:22:08PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:11:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > However, I do feel my comment is justified in the sense that if there is
> > one thing in Debian that is the joint responsibility of _all_ DDs, then
> > it is the website.
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> > packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> > gene
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:11:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> However, I do feel my comment is justified in the sense that if there is
> one thing in Debian that is the joint responsibility of _all_ DDs, then
> it is the website. So yes, if you've never contributed in any way to the
> website, fe
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:11:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> However, I do feel my comment is justified in the sense that if there is
> one thing in Debian that is the joint responsibility of _all_ DDs, then
> it is the website. So yes, if you've never contributed in any way to the
> website, f
On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:58, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> So well, sorry, but I don't see why I should be part of every
> mis-functioning team in Debian to have the right to say they do a poor
> job.
Constructive criticism is welcome; ridiculing only shows a bad attitude by
the person who does it
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:07, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > and the debian-www team is recovering from the
> > shock that HTML 4.01 has been released recently and that CSS2 is almost
> > stable (err wait, I wasn't reading my calendar proper
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 22:35 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > > Another important point: such a system would help a lot to obtain lower
> > > testing migration times, but it would not help backports at all
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > If you can reuse most of the build-deps from testing instead of having to
> > recompile the build-deps too, it helps a lot.
>
> The build-deps also need to be rebuilt against the stable libc.
>
> > If you can reuse a
> > package from testing in st
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmaruku-ruby
Version : 0.5.6
Upstream Author : Andrea Censi
* URL : http://maruku.rubyforge.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : a Markdo
On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:07, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> and the debian-www team is recovering from the
> shock that HTML 4.01 has been released recently and that CSS2 is almost
> stable (err wait, I wasn't reading my calendar properly, we're in 2007
> not 1997, sorry).
Why don't you join the team?
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:02:37PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 22:34 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > > > This is not going to work. Checking that symbols are present in a
> > > > version does not guarantee they provid
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libaopalliance-java
Version : 20070526
Upstream Author : Andrei Popovici, Bob Lee, Rod Johnson, Renaud Pawlak, Jon
Tirsen, Philippe Ombredanne
* URL
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:54:06PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070526 21:52]:
> > > In order to try to address that I started a wiki page whose goal is to be
> > > a
> > > good introductory page to all teams.
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 22:34 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > > This is not going to work. Checking that symbols are present in a
> > > version does not guarantee they provide the required ABI.
> >
> > If the ABI changes, the soname changes. I st
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070526 21:52]:
> > In order to try to address that I started a wiki page whose goal is to be a
> > good introductory page to all teams. Anyone who wants to learn more about
> > some teams should be able to consult th
Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 22:34 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > This is not going to work. Checking that symbols are present in a
> > version does not guarantee they provide the required ABI.
>
> If the ABI changes, the soname changes. I store the information of symbols
> for a given soname. So
Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 22:35 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Another important point: such a system would help a lot to obtain lower
> > testing migration times, but it would not help backports at all, since
> > you still have to rebuild the package against the stable libc.
>
> If you can re
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:13:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070526 21:52]:
> > In order to try to address that I started a wiki page whose goal is to be a
> > good introductory page to all teams. Anyone who wants to learn more about
> > some teams should
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> > packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> > generating dependenci
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> When a trigger is activated, it becomes pending for every package
> which is interested in the trigger at that time. Each package has a
> list of zero or more pending triggers. Repeated activation of the
> same trigger has no addit
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> > packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> > generating dependencies on shared lib
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070526 21:52]:
> In order to try to address that I started a wiki page whose goal is to be a
> good introductory page to all teams. Anyone who wants to learn more about
> some teams should be able to consult the page and have an idea of what
> he/she could do
Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> generating dependencies on shared libraries.
Another important point: such a
Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:55 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> If libfoo 1.2 adds a new value in the enum (FOO_MODE_C), a new binary
> built against it may use it, and in this case will need version 1.2.
> However there is no obvious way by looking at the binary to tell whether
> this is the cas
Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 21:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
> packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
> generating dependencies on shared libraries. The system should have
> historical knowledge
Hello,
in the list of things that we can do to make it more easy to backport
packages, there's one important item: have a finer-grained system for
generating dependencies on shared libraries. The system should have
historical knowledges of symbols exported by libraries. Then when
generating depend
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:25:02 +0100
Due to time constraints I expect to continue to at least October,
I'm not able to devote sufficient time to the Gutenprint packages
in order to do a good job of keeping on top of bug reports, keeping
up-t
Le Saturday 26 May 2007 14:19:04 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
> I've been trought the previous spip bugs, and it seems that missing
> security support was mostly because of MIA maintainer that anything else.
>
> As for what I've seen from SPIP devel activities, they seem very active and
> resp
Hi folks,
Due to time constraints I expect to continue to at least October, I'm
not able to devote sufficient time to the Gutenprint packages in order
to do a good job of keeping on top of bug reports, keeping up-to-date
with new upstream versions, and testing to make sure it is well
integrated wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: notification-daemon-xfce
Version : 0.3.7
Upstream Author : Nick Schermer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/notification-daemon-x
Hi !
Le Saturday 26 May 2007 13:03:09 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit :
> This was already in the archive and has been removed mostly for
> it's poor security track record. Re-introducing it is a very
> bad idea.
I've been trought the previous spip bugs, and it seems that missing secu
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> * Package name: spip
> Version : 1.9.2b
> Upstream Author : SPIP Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.spip.net/ and
> http://trac.rezo.net/trac/spip/
> * License : Mainly GPL and other open source
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:19:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> For those who don't routinely decipher DVDs, can you enlighten me? Did
> they include a master key in all DVDs which is just a number? Pointers
> to a press release are welcome, google only gives results similar to
> this ITP...
>
>
Hi wilfried,
i have opened the ITP sometimes ago already:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404862
having in mind to co-maintain citadel on Debian ;)
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42 matches
Mail list logo
