-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Weskey,
Am Di den 22. Mai 2007 um 0:53 schrieb Wesley J. Landaker:
> > If hardlinks are okay too, see the "perforate" package (I find this
> > package hard to find, since the name is somewhat misleading). It's
> > written in Perl.
>
> Well, thank
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:10:05AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Thus on amd64 digikam depends on libkexiv2-1 and conflicts with
> > > libexiv2-0.12, but libkexiv2-1 depends on libexiv2-0.12.
> > Why does it need to conflict?
> The conflict was done
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Thus on amd64 digikam depends on libkexiv2-1 and conflicts with
> > libexiv2-0.12, but libkexiv2-1 depends on libexiv2-0.12.
>
> Why does it need to conflict?
Thanks Steve,
The conflict was done to prevent the situation where:
digikam was linked aga
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:10:46PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> You are correct, sorry for closing out your bug so quickly..
> Question for debian-devel. I'm aware of the Debian Library Packaging guide,
> but
> not quite sure how we should of handled this library transition, short of
> waiting
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2007 21:49, Martin Habets wrote:
FYI, 2.6.21 is rock solid on my SS20 here. Do you consider it broken
just because of some cdrom issues? Or is there more?
I don't have more details than this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2007/05/msg00305.html
On Monday 21 May 2007 00:16:13 Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:42:56PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> > For a package problem I'm trying to solve (#414422), it would be nice
> > to have a tool that could find duplicate files (ala fslint[1] or
> > fdupes[2]) and turn th
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> So you agree to a separate -offtopic list?
[and]
> Maybe a #debian-offtopic would help there too.
Why should Debian developers spend the time setting up infrastructure
for lists or IRC channels that, by definition even, have nothing to do
with the Debian project? If the
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:05:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > The same concerns were levelled at the #debian IRC channel a while
> > back, and there are certain parallels. I don't monitor that either,
> > for much the same reason
Le Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Andrei Popescu a écrit :
>
> IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out
By the way, isn't debian-devel an off-topic place for this discussion?
I have nothing against the content of it, but would recommend to keep
things organised. Otherwise, i
Am Freitag, den 18.05.2007, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Amir Tabatabaei:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 12:29 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> > You should try using aptitude, it does what you want ;-)
>
> Just a friendly question: Why is this feature not added to apt-get, too?
> It is so useful and the
reopen 425381
thanks
Thanks Andrew,
You are correct, sorry for closing out your bug so quickly..
Question for debian-devel. I'm aware of the Debian Library Packaging guide, but
not quite sure how we should of handled this library transition, short of
waiting
for each library to be built by the
On Monday 21 May 2007 21:49, Martin Habets wrote:
> FYI, 2.6.21 is rock solid on my SS20 here. Do you consider it broken
> just because of some cdrom issues? Or is there more?
I don't have more details than this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2007/05/msg00305.html
pgpfhbQ39fOPO.pgp
Descr
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij
> Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question
> if support sparc32 should be dropped for Lenny [1].
I agree with this intent, as I wrot
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The plan is to continue the existing port, dropping support for 64 bit
> kernels and allowing use of SPARC v9 instructions rather than to do a
I, of course, mean *32* bit kernels there.
Sorry.
*sigh*
--
"You grabbed my hand and w
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > The same concerns were levelled at the #debian IRC channel a while
> > back, and there are certain parallels. I don't monitor that either,
> > for much the same reasons (though it may have improved since it moved
> > From FreeNode).
Lengthy off topic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Chernyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 9.1.3-2
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://newlisp.org/
* License : GPL and compatibles
Programming Lang: C
Descript
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
>
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> >> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> >> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a speci
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:44:18PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ma, 2007-05-21 at 20:08 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > The description for -curiosa does not suggest it to be appropiate for
> > the kind of off-topic discussions going on on -user.
>
> Your conclusion is correct, and I'd like
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> Fine, as long as you provide 32-bit as well as 64-bit userland. Otherwise
The plan is to continue the existing port, dropping support for 64 bit
kernels and allowing use of SPARC v9 instructions rather than to do a
new port with 64 bit
On ma, 2007-05-21 at 20:08 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> The description for -curiosa does not suggest it to be appropiate for
> the kind of off-topic discussions going on on -user.
Your conclusion is correct, and I'd like to suggest a corollary: there's
no Debian mailing list where advocating v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
>> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
>> "off-topic" messages. For the messages to be "social lubr
[Alastair McKinstry]
> I'm the maintainer of slang2.
> I uploaded version 2.0.7 19 days ago, and according to http://
> ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#slang2
> its blocked by the etch freeze...
All packages with udebs are frozen by default, because the archive
system do not
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij
> > Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question
> > if support sparc32 sho
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij
> Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question
> if support sparc32 should be dropped for Lenny [1].
Fine, as long as you provide 32-bit
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:26:31PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> They don't have to take it away from the Debian lists... They can always
> discuss on debian-curiosa if they so desire. Just don't let the
> off-topic discussions pollute the other lists.
The description for -curiosa does not s
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> > discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
> > "off-topic" messages. For the me
On Monday 21 May 2007 18:11, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 16:44:42 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of slang2.
> > I uploaded version 2.0.7 19 days ago, and according to
> > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#slang2
> > its blocked
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:51:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
>
> > IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out of the forum
> > (read Debian community) is not good. Debian is based on volunteers
> > and for some contributors (yes, answering que
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 16:44:42 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of slang2.
> I uploaded version 2.0.7 19 days ago, and according to
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#slang2
> its blocked by the etch freeze...
>
> Is this still the case,
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of slang2.
I uploaded version 2.0.7 19 days ago, and according to
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#slang2
its blocked by the etch freeze...
Is this still the case, or a false alarm?
Regards
Alastair McKinstry
# slang2 (2.0.6-4 to 2.0.7-1)
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: linux-phc
Version : 0.2.10
Upstream Author : Fabrice Bellamy, Roman Schwarze
* URL : https://www.dedigentoo.org/trac/linux-phc/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C)
D
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:35:47PM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:32:40AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> [...]
> > aptitude [...] does everything apt-get does...
> [...]
>
> Well, analogies to 'apt-get source' and 'apt-get build-dep' were
> still missing the last time I tried,
On Mon, 21 May 2007 14:56:49 +0200
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Neil,
> > > > Yep, I'm generating them on compile time in my packages and storing them
> > > > in an auxillary file. shipping another 1k file with the package felt
> > > > nicer to me than computing it on install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
> IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out of the forum
> (read Debian community) is not good. Debian is based on volunteers
> and for some contributors (yes, answering questions is also a way of
> contributing, so you - the DDs - don't have
Hello Neil,
> > > Yep, I'm generating them on compile time in my packages and storing them
> > > in an auxillary file. shipping another 1k file with the package felt
> > > nicer to me than computing it on install time.
> >
> > That's fine as long as the dependencies don't change due to local
> >
On Mon, 21 May 2007 19:08:34 +1000
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 10:34, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > SELinux policy modules and debian packages, which discovers the
> > > relationships between modules and orders the policy load correctly,
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 10:34, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SELinux policy modules and debian packages, which discovers the
> > relationships between modules and orders the policy load correctly, so
> > that it can pull in any dependency as required.
>
> Yep, I'm generating th
On Saturday 19 May 2007 02:00, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We'd also need people to work on e.g. an exim and a tomcat policy.
>
> I don't use exim, or tomcat, so this is likely to take me
> longer. The version I uploaded last night now fixes all the problems I
> saw l
On Saturday 19 May 2007 02:08, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 22:54:00 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
>
I have not yet made this change. I have discovered additional
> issues with cron;
> ,
>
> | #= initrc_t ==
>
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I'm not talking about installing multiple kernels. I'm talking about
> setting the wanted configuration for how multiple kernels should be
> handled on the installed system after the installation. And that
> setting would be
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
> "off-topic" messages. For the messages to be "social lubricant", they
> need to be *interspersed* with the
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> That sounds to me like addressing the wrong problem. Maybe what should
> be done is that update-initramfs updates *all* the images, whatever
> happens, but a copy of the kernel and initramfs images used to boot the
> system as it is at
42 matches
Mail list logo
