Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> With Gnus+Mailcrypt, I was unable to vote with a signed but not
>> encrypted ballot. The voting daemon claimed that there was some
>> kind of quoted-printable problem. This surprised me: Gnus and
>> Mailcrypt ha
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With Gnus+Mailcrypt, I was unable to vote with a signed but not
> encrypted ballot. The voting daemon claimed that there was some
> kind of quoted-printable problem. This surprised me: Gnus and
> Mailcrypt have not caused problems for me with any previous
>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Ben Pfaff wrote:
However, this is the only ballot I recall containing
non-ASCII characters, which could be the cause.
Ahhh, this is a typical cause of problems. So we have three chances:
1) fix software that interprets incoming mails
2) issue an alternate ballot wher
Hi
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:56:23 +0200
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
> > ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
> > here becaus
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 01:42, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
> > DebPool is a Debian package archiver written in Perl by Joel Aelwyn
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Like mini-dinstall it's a lightweight replacement
> > for "the real deal" that
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
> ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
> here because I personally add a count of three to the rejects and
> have no idea how to vote successfully.
With
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Just a suggestion: Ask him to create a project on alioth and add you to
> the project. The last time I heard of him, he didn't want to let debpool
> die, but lacked time. Did you try to contact him directly?
>
> > I could of course fork it (except that
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:43:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> >> The maintainer is not MIA, but does not actively develop anymore.
>
> > Packages like this should have a message to the current maintaine
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
here because I personally add a count of three to the reject
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
> ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
> here because I personally add a count of three to the rejects and
> have no idea how to vote succes
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
===
|||Total # of| |Valid|Unique|Rejects|| Multiple ||
||Year|Developers|Quorum|Votes|Voters| |% Voting| of Quorum||
---
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> The maintainer is not MIA, but does not actively develop anymore.
> Packages like this should have a message to the current maintainer with
> a proposal to co-maintain or orphan+adopt followed by an ITH (int
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The maintainer is not MIA, but does not actively develop anymore.
Packages like this should have a message to the current maintainer
with a proposal to co-maintain or orphan+adopt followed by an ITH
(intent to hijack) if there is no response within a re
d Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:19:45PM -0400, Matthias Julius a écrit :
> "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Automatically orphaning such packages has problems as Russel pointed out,
> >but a "needs co-maintainers"/"needs hijacking" list of packages where
> >DD's
Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
> DebPool is a Debian package archiver written in Perl by Joel Aelwyn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Like mini-dinstall it's a lightweight replacement
> for "the real deal" that manages Debian's package archive, but unlike
> mini-dinstal
DebPool is a Debian package archiver written in Perl by Joel Aelwyn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Like mini-dinstall it's a lightweight replacement
for "the real deal" that manages Debian's package archive, but unlike
mini-dinstall it uses a full pool layout. The current version is 0.2.3 and
it's in the
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This proposal strikes me as being similar to some of the push for team
> maintained packages - we need to be careful to avoid focusing so much on
> the metrics we're using to measure quality of maintenance that we end up
> optimising them without getting an
Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But then what happens in the case (that was already pointed out) where a
> bug languishes without attention for a year or more, someone NMUs to fix
> the bug and the mainainer immediately uploads to revert the NMU? It
> seems that there needs to be
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:06:17PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> But then what happens in the case (that was already pointed out) where a
> bug languishes without attention for a year or more, someone NMUs to fix
> the bug and the mainainer immediately uploads to revert the NMU? It
> seems t
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:19:45PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Automatically orphaning such packages has problems as Russel pointed out,
> >but a "needs co-maintainers"/"needs hijacking" list of packages where
> >DD's ca
I demand that Matthias Julius may or may not have written...
> Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And almost every laptop comes with wired and wireless interfaces.
> I almost wrote that myself, but they have different names and dont
> compete for numbers.
It depends on which driver is
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 11:55, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I almost wrote that myself, but they have different names and dont
> compete for numbers.
That's not necessarily true. My IPW2200 has eth2 on my laptop.
wt
--
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State Unive
"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Automatically orphaning such packages has problems as Russel pointed out,
>but a "needs co-maintainers"/"needs hijacking" list of packages where
>DD's can be more aggressive in jumping/taking over in seems a good idea
>IMO.
Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And almost every laptop comes with wired and wireless interfaces.
I almost wrote that myself, but they have different names and dont
compete for numbers.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> e0acebd2-71f1-4df8-ae4d-50355ad7aa81
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Wouter Verhelst
> [ 9 ] Choice 2: Aigars Mahinovs
> [ 6 ] Choice 3: Gustavo Franco
> [ 3 ] Choice 4: Sam Hocevar
> [ 3 ] Choice 5: Steve McIntyre
> [ 1 ] Choice
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: haproxy
Version : 1.2.17
Upstream Author : Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
* License : GPL
Description : fast and reliable load balan
On Monday 26 March 2007 16:00, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> you could mount them by UUID instead of the device name.
Don't forget having to use a static fsid parameter in /etc/exports for the
affected mounts. Otherwise, the device major/minor numbers for the mounted
devices still affect what machines
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:47:38AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
> > the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
> > getting mired in a sea of
On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:27:55PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > *what's* in it. Just because it has a patch tag doesn't mean it's
> > > necessarily any higher-quality of a bug unless
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
>>configuration, it will no longer bring up the network on boot because
>>the device name changed. If the box is using NFS, NIS, or LDAP,
>>people may even have trouble logging i
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 08:32 -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:06:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Specifically because:
> >> * Most machines have only one interface (If Debian is running on more
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:06:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Specifically because:
>> * Most machines have only one interface (If Debian is running on more
>> routers
>> than workstations, obviously this would be wrong, but
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:27:55PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > *what's* in it. Just because it has a patch tag doesn't mean it's
> > necessarily any higher-quality of a bug unless it's been triaged.
> It may not be higher quality,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:17:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm willing to support being more aggressive than we currently are about
> changing maintainers when someone else steps up and is willing to do the
> work, but I'm not willing to support any proposal that automatically
> orphans packa
On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > If so, what action do you think should be taken in the case where those
> > bug reports are not addressed by the package maintainer?
>
> Someone should triage the bug and remove the tag if the patch isn't
> adequate. An untriaged bug is an untriage
On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
> the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
> getting mired in a sea of bugs.
We still miss around 600 bugs in our backlog:
http://users.alio
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:12:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > People should be given assistance and encouragement in
> > > doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
> > >
On Mar 27, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Most machines have only one interface (If Debian is running on more routers
> than workstations, obviously this would be wrong, but I doubt that's the
> case.)
Every laptop with wifi has more than one interface, and so does every
system
On Mar 26, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the problem is that you can't know in advance whether the device
> still exists or not, and whether it will be plugged in later (because
> everything runs asynchronously).
Or if it does not exist because it has been phisically removed
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:06:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I would guess the second, or more specifically I would guess that in any
> given
> month,
> - (the total number of instances of admins swapping out network hardware and
> needing to reuse the same interface names)
> is gre
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I like doing bug triage as well. I guess it is because I am a neat
> > freak and anal about organization.
>
> Would you still like it if the bug count for one package would number in
> hundreds ?
It's easy to have a huge backlog. I believe a more
41 matches
Mail list logo
