Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mcs
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sacredspiral.co.uk/~nenolod/mcs/
* License : BSD
Description : abst
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jorge Salamero Sanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mppenc
Version : 1.16
Upstream Author : Musepack Development Team
* URL : http://www.musepack.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Musepac
Luciano Bello wrote:
> The maintainer of imagemagick, Ryuichi Arafune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> didn't answer any ping [1]. So, I will hijack this package. I will comaintain
> [2] it with Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. A new upload is coming.
great, thanks you too for taking care.
--
Addr
oops, wrong list should've gone to debian-l10n-dutch
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
pgpsfu7t4U5Pj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
boinc_5.4.11-4_nl.po
Description: application/gettext
pgp3qHNCj8kw9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
amavisd-new_1:2.4.2-6.1_nl.po
Description: application/gettext
pgppErUFqy9Yf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the help. FWIW, I confirm that it indeed fixes an issue on
my box.
1.
unfortunately it probably implies that I was wrong in my estimate of
connection of this issue to original old #152250. It was reported
on 1:3.4p1-0.0woody1, which came out on 26 Jun 2002 whenever the patc
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:26:51 -0500, Roberto C Sanchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:16:17AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> Volunteers volunteer because of non-monetary rewards they gain from
>> contributing.
I should have known better to not guard against
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:50:56AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> If you're volunteering on a project and someone with more time does all the
> work that involves learning, you don't end up learning much because you
> don't end up solving much.
>
> On the other hand, if your job involves so much
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:26:51AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:16:17AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> > Volunteers volunteer because of non-monetary rewards they gain
> > from contributing.
>
> Really? I volunteer (in addition to the altruistic re
(crossposted to several mailing lists. Please respect the Reply-To field)
As of March 3rd 2007, all packages in Debian unstable that have
translatable debconf templates are translated into French [1].
This is the result of a continuous effort in the last years and
particularly the last 4.5 years,
On Saturday 03 March 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> So I understand where people are coming from when they say that they
> want Debian to remain 100% fully volunteer. But first of all, that
> isn't even true even now; HP is funding some DD's to work mostly on
> Debian-related projects, and certainly
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:16:17AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Volunteers volunteer because of non-monetary rewards they gain
> from contributing.
Really? I volunteer (in addition to the altruistic reasons) because I
want to learn more about Linux and Debian, which makes me a bet
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 10:45:47 -0500, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The principle you stated obviously tends to be the case in volunteer
> organizations, true. It does not have to be the case of a paid
> employee, but yes, even if the maintainer team sets the general
> policy and gives d
Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 10:45 -0500, Theodore Tso a écrit :
> Well, Josselin has been very negative about the whole concept of
> paying volunteers, and given that he was asking for help, and saying
> that his GNOME team was drowning under bug reports, I couldn't help
> but reply that if he really
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : sshfp
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Authors : Paul Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Jake Appelbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xelerance.com/software/sshfp/
* License
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:57:01PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> You forgot a single damn point: in debian, like in many projects, the
> one that "do" things is often the guy that "decide" things because he's
> the one there. If you put people that work 5 times more as me because
> they have th
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:33:30 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> you always have the problem that you
> might miss new configuration flags or you have to adapt the
> new file manually from your old backup and "merge" the
> changes.
Ack, that's annoying IMO.
> What about the possibility to view the pa
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:03:40PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 18:57 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > but I would
> > obviously lessen my implication and work for other teams where I've a
> > single damn chance to see my contribution to be compareable to the
> > others.
>
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 18:57 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> but I would
> obviously lessen my implication and work for other teams where I've a
> single damn chance to see my contribution to be compareable to the
> others.
Better a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a big pond huh?
So
Hi,
what about the following idea.
If a configuration file is marked as conffile in a package
you have the possibility to select between:
- Install the new version of the configuration file from the
package
- Keep your current installed version of the file
- View the differences
This is imho
21 matches
Mail list logo
