Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:37:18AM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, for me the most consistent practice for packaging ice* extensions > post etch would be to use the extension name as package name and put > info about its relation to our ice-apps into (short) description and

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:12:47PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > apt-file search usr/lib/firefox/extensions/ | cut -d: -f1 | grep -v > > firefox-locale- | sort | uniq | while read package; do apt-file list > > $package | grep -q 'usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/' || echo $package; done > fire

Re: ssh-krb5 Conflicts/Replaces behaving oddly with conffiles

2006-12-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:17:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As far as I can tell from 402806, with a bit of guessing, what happens > > is: > > > 1. unpack latest ssh-krb5 > >(old conffiles not deleted) > > 2. unpack openssh-server (conflicts is now

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:13:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:55:59PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL > > > PROTEC

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-12-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:41:40 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:07:28 -0600, Manoj Srivastava >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Out of curiousity, what _did_ you expect the blocking tag to do? > I would for example, expect the blocked bug to be notified when > som

Re: Mozilla- prefix. Was: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:54:34PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > So possible ways I see > 1. leave it as is and have mozilla- prefix > 2. figure out substitution to the mozilla trademark > 3. remove prefix once and forever and use appropriate tags. After all, > many applications use some c

Re: ssh-krb5 Conflicts/Replaces behaving oddly with conffiles

2006-12-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ> Could someone who knows more about how Conflicts and > Russ> Replaces is supposed to work, particularly in combination > Russ> with conffiles, take a look at bugs #402804 and #402806

Bug#402841: ITP: Google Web Toolkit -- Google Web Toolkit (GWT)

2006-12-12 Thread Christian Bayle
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: Google Web Toolkit Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : Google, Inc. * URL : http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/ * License : (Apache 2.0, Eclipse 1.0, Mozilla 1.1, LGPL 2.1)

Re: ssh-krb5 Conflicts/Replaces behaving oddly with conffiles

2006-12-12 Thread Brian May
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ> Could someone who knows more about how Conflicts and Russ> Replaces is supposed to work, particularly in combination Russ> with conffiles, take a look at bugs #402804 and #402806? I Russ> don't understand why this isn'

ssh-krb5 Conflicts/Replaces behaving oddly with conffiles

2006-12-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Could someone who knows more about how Conflicts and Replaces is supposed to work, particularly in combination with conffiles, take a look at bugs #402804 and #402806? I don't understand why this isn't working. It looks to me like all the right Conflicts and Replaces are in place so that the dumm

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear All, It seems that I raised the wave without need. now that I removed starting / from the search expression, updated lists to up to date sid (before it was etch... khe khe), and apt-file update, I get different list (after removing the ones you've mentioned) > apt-file search usr/lib/firef

Re: please let mplayer into testing

2006-12-12 Thread A Mennucc
Moritz Muehlenhoff ha scritto: > A Mennucc wrote: >> Brief summary of bug: MPlayer contains an embedded copy of FFmpeg >> (indeed, they are developed by ~the same people); Aur=E9lien G=C9R=D4ME a= >> nd >> Moritz Muehlenhoff ask that the mplayer package be dynamically linked to >> the libraries i

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:37:15PM +, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I demand that Yaroslav Halchenko may or may not have written... > > > Unfortunately I didn't spot this problem when I was closing #400168. > > Iceweasel after transition doesn't care about extensions listed under >

Re: Bug#402650: Mozilla- prefix. Was: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> So possible ways I see > 1. leave it as is and have mozilla- prefix > 2. figure out substitution to the mozilla trademark Since all the ex-mozilla packages are now quite frozen in ice... I meant they all start with ice prefix (iceweasel, icedove and even iceape) why not to use prefix ice-? At l

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Yaroslav Halchenko may or may not have written... > Unfortunately I didn't spot this problem when I was closing #400168. > Iceweasel after transition doesn't care about extensions listed under > /usr/lib/firefox/extensions/ and require them under > /usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/. So

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:02:07PM +0100, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Here is the list of packages which have smth under firefox/extensions > > but no iceweasel/extensions > > You can remove all the locales (all, including uk), because > iceweasel-l10

Re: Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Here is the list of packages which have smth under firefox/extensions > but no iceweasel/extensions You can remove all the locales (all, including uk), because iceweasel-l10n already installs to /usr/lib/iceweasel and nothing anymore to /usr/lib/firefox since the first

Re: Dropping GStreamer 0.8 for etch

2006-12-12 Thread A Mennucc
Josselin Mouette ha scritto: > As the situation is very similar in mplayer, mplayer is considered > RC-buggy by the security team. Josselin Mouette is talking about is bug 395252 Moritz Muehlenhoff (that is in security) asserted that he thinks that that bug 395252 should be RC But then I asked t

Iceweasel extensions lacking links migrating from firefox. Mass bug?

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear Developers, Unfortunately I didn't spot this problem when I was closing #400168. Iceweasel after transition doesn't care about extensions listed under /usr/lib/firefox/extensions/ and require them under /usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions/. So quite a few broke (I have 2) So 2 possible solutions

Mozilla- prefix. Was: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> > > > I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension > > > > packages ... now that we have ice*. > > > But then, what to use instead ? > > Reading from the package description, this extension is just for > > iceweasel ... so maybe iceweasel-foxyproxy ... > With a little wor

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Thanks for the info. I used to use switchproxy but after some upgrade I was looking for something different and came across foxyproxy. It has been working fine for me. Anyways, foxyproxy is not to be in etch release, so I will take a burden of trying to resolve/forward issues users would encounter

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Indeed, I stopped for a moment while deciding upon the name, but then proceeded since all the other extensions have this prefix. Problem is that iceweasel is not a common name for all "mozilla" products (former mozilla-browser, mozilla-thunderbird, etc) which all could use some common plugins , li

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:55:59PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav H

Bug#402792: ITP: mapnik -- C++/Python toolkit for developing GIS applications

2006-12-12 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mapnik Version : 0.3.0+svn?? Upstream Author : Artem Pavlenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et al * URL : http://www.mapnik.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++, Python

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy > > >

buildd: Unmet build dependencies: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)

2006-12-12 Thread Shaun Jackman
Why is the buildd not finding debhelper? Thanks, Shaun http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=monotone&ver=0.31-3&arch=powerpc&file=log Automatic build of monotone_0.31-3 on malo by sbuild/powerpc 99.99 Build started at 20061205-2149 ... ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-D

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Warren Turkal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 17:27]: > On Tuesday 12 December 2006 04:05, Don Armstrong wrote: > > [If you're doing this, you > > better have already written (or gotten someone else to write) the > > patch to fix whatever bug you want reopened and fixed; otherwise the > > ctte will l

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-12 Thread Warren Turkal
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 04:05, Don Armstrong wrote: > [If you're doing this, you > better have already written (or gotten someone else to write) the > patch to fix whatever bug you want reopened and fixed; otherwise the > ctte will likely close and ignore your bug report too.] So even if it's

Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-12 Thread Don Armstrong
I normally wouldn't respond to -devel about this sort of thing, but because this is the third time this week that someone has asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to deal with this sort of issue, I am. Please followup to -devel, not this bug or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you disagree for some reason. On Mon, 11 D

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.12.12.1119 +0100]: > I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension > packages ... now that we have ice*. Also, foxyproxy has an amazing track record of instability. I ended up purging it again. Just FYI. -- .''`. mart

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-12-12 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:07:28 -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Out of curiousity, what _did_ you expect the blocking tag to > do? I would for example, expect the blocked bug to be notified when something relevant happens to the blocking bug. And, I would expect it to be i

Re: Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for iceweasel

2006-12-12 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:56:12PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Package: wnpp > Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: mozilla-foxyproxy > I don't think we should still use the mozilla-* prefix for extension packages ... now that we have