Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: subversive
Version : 1.1.0~M9
* URL :
http://www.polarion.org/index.php?page=overview&project=subversive
* License : Eclipse Public License v1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Des
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:06:33 +0200, "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That's 300,000 different IP addresses that have checked for any updated
>software in Fedora Core 6.
>
>If you simply divide it out, that averages to about 12,500 per day, or 8.7
>every minute. And basically, tho
Hi,
> Where stability is relative to the filesystem. :)
>
> I actually would like to see the latest xfsprogs in etch simply
> because they contain fixes for the recent XFS kernel bugs, so if
> you've been bitten, you can at least get your data back.
>
I've also run into problems with xfs due t
Hi Eddy,
(CCing d-devel, joining Christoph Haas' thread)
> The nvi package is an editor, but in spite of that it does not provide
> the virtual package "editor".
>
> Please add this Provides.
please see this discussion thread[1] back in 1996 about the virtual packages
list that is included in th
Am Samstag 18 November 2006 19:42 schrieb George Danchev:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:33, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > On Friday 17 November 2006 15:22, George Danchev wrote:
> > > * `cd-burner' -- could be provided by wodim, cdrskin, (cdrdao
> > > ?) * `dvd-burner' -- could be provid
Hello!
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:42:16 +0200 George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:33, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > If they can't be used with the exact same commandline, there's no
> > sense in providing these virtual packages because the programs need
> > explicit support for each
On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:33, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Friday 17 November 2006 15:22, George Danchev wrote:
> > * `cd-burner' -- could be provided by wodim, cdrskin, (cdrdao ?)
> > * `dvd-burner' -- could be provided by wodim, dvd+rw-tools and
> > dvdrecord
>
> I don't kn
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 11:30 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix
> > features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an
> > issue?
>
>
> Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use
> ls in a shell scr
also sprach Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.2218 +0800]:
> With 2.6.17-stable bug -- corrected file system, so one will not
> have unpleasant log messages futher. This is a problem of
> *testers*, who was affected by that bug. It was said version .10
> corrects fs, but i saw people, who
On 2006-11-18, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> also sprach Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.1204 +0100]:
>> True; but IMO xf
also sprach Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.1204 +0100]:
> True; but IMO xfsprogs is relatively stable,
Where stability is relative to the filesystem. :)
I actually would like to see the latest xfsprogs in etch simply
because they contain fixes for the recent XFS kernel bugs, so if
y
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> xfsprogs-2.8.16 (30 October 2006)
>- Fix up an endian problem for nlink setting in phase 7 for xfs_repair.
Likely a grave bug on some archs.
> xfsprogs-2.8.15 (19 October 2006)
>- Fix up nlink checks and repairs in phase 7 for xfs_repair.
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006, Michael Banck wrote:
> We are preparing a release, so packaging new upstream versions is much
> less of a target right now than fixing bugs.
True; but IMO xfsprogs is relatively stable, and the changes are
usually bug fixes. I grabbed the tarballs to make sure
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 18:15 -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
>> A builtin ls might be a good idea for disaster recovery shells,
>> though zsh-static does not have it. posh is not intended to be
>> such a shell, nor to b
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:23:42AM +, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Hallo. I'm new here, let me in, please.
>
> xfsprogs debian's maintainer left SGI and i don't know if he announced
> anything about debian. Version in unstable is .11, while in upstream
> it's already .16.
>
> util-linux maintaining a
On Friday 17 November 2006 15:22, George Danchev wrote:
> * `cd-burner' -- could be provided by wodim, cdrskin, (cdrdao ?)
> * `dvd-burner' -- could be provided by wodim, dvd+rw-tools and
> dvdrecord
I don't know the programs in question exactly, but how likely is it that
even wod
On Friday 17 November 2006 16:44, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006, George Danchev wrote:
> > Using alternatives mechanism -- currently I don't think that using
> > alternatives mechanism would be a benefit as a whole, but I might be
> > blind of course.
>
> Check /usr/bin/sensible-*
17 matches
Mail list logo
