In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 18:15 -0500, Clint Adams wrote: >> A builtin ls might be a good idea for disaster recovery shells, >> though zsh-static does not have it. posh is not intended to be >> such a shell, nor to be particularly useful interactively. >> Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use >> ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value.
> Well, the goal was (in part) to catch scripts which use non-Posix > features of echo and test; why are non-Posix features of ls not an > issue? <quote> Since I cannot think of a legitimate reason for anyone to use ls in a shell script, I think it would add little value. <unquote> cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
