On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
Yes and no. From the bug report I think your approach was more
complex (esp. since it involved sudo). Mine's really just a hack
that will only do some silly check if it's called over an SSH
connection and a terminal is connected. Otherwise it just pass
Been having problems with Seahorse and encryption from gnome. (Nautilus,
Gedit, Evolution)
When I try to sign, I get the error "Couldn't Load Keys"
When I try to Encrypt, it loads the keys for selection and then exists
when I try to encrypt without and error.
It was working before I upgraded fr
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's a bad example. X is a client/server system for a reason.
>
> E.g., there is no graphical hardware for s390, yet it can still be a
> good idea to use X software on s390 hardware with X terminals.
Yeah, that's the thing -- while maintainers are us
On 10/15/06, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading about Dunc Tank. I did it because I'm seeing lots
> of messages of disgusting, lots of packages have been orphaned, and
> blog entries that have a kind of upset, too.
>
> I would be glad if you give me your opinions abou
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:38:43AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> * Package name: make2build
> Version : 0.42
> Upstream Author : Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
> http://search.cpan.org/~schubiger/Module-Build-Convert-0.42/
> * License : Artistic
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:08:17PM -0500, Clarence Risher wrote:
> of yaird. Should that be filed as a bug against
> linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 even though its not always a dependency?
Yes.
> And that leads me to the general question, on the topic of
> sometimes-dependencies. Does debian have a
First, a specific 'bug' that may not be, then a general query.
Trying to install linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 I got an error while running
mkinitrd.yaird which I ended up resolving by installing a newer verison
of yaird. Should that be filed as a bug against
linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 even though i
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something I have yet to understand is what purposes the bounce [from
> a moderated list] serve in the first place. Moderating is OK, but
> bouncing ?
I read many mailing lists (this one, for example) without being
subscribed as a member.
An automated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: make2build
Version : 0.42
Upstream Author : Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~schubiger/Module-Build-Convert-0.42/
* License : Artistic
P
Am Montag 16 Oktober 2006 11:34 schrieb Frank Küster:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Even worse, you again have to use KDE or Gnome to take advantage of
> >> network-manager. Why are we leaving CLI users out in the cold?
> >
> > Good question. The concept for a cli like this wou
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 07:51:04PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > My question, is, if this is ok with the debian packaging policy chapter
> > 3.3, or not (that is should I file a bug?)
>
> It is not considered acceptable. It's t
also sprach Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.16.2151 +0200]:
> It is exactly what I did and what caused the trouble and hours
> of debugging.
Yes and no. From the bug report I think your approach was more
complex (esp. since it involved sudo). Mine's really just a hack
that will only do
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libconfig-inetd-perl
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~schubiger/Config-Inetd-0.25/
* License : Artistic
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
>> >> I went over many packages looki
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Even worse, you again have to use KDE or Gnome to take advantage of
>> network-manager. Why are we leaving CLI users out in the cold?
>
> Good question. The concept for a cli like this would need many thoughts,
> though. A GUI makes that a bit easier
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/15/06 22:01, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * Package name: teamspeak-client
>> Version : 2.0.32
>> Upstream Author : TeamSpeak Systems <
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.16.1740 +0200]:
This script, along with symlinks from halt and reboot, lives in
/usr/local/sbin on all my systems
Replacing halt might be a bit risky, as the story in
http://bugs.debian.or
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 07:51:04PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> My question, is, if this is ok with the debian packaging policy chapter
> 3.3, or not (that is should I file a bug?)
It is not considered acceptable. It's the default settings on alioth,
and instructions on how to fix them are posted
Hi,
I have a question according maintainer email contact addresses: A group
of packages have a - well - kind of private email list.
But if reporting bugs, for example, you get a kind of bounce, which is
quite annoying: (shows also up in the bug tracking system)
--- quote ---
Your mail to ... w
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Lech Karol Paw³aszek wrote:
>
>> On Monday 16 October 2006 00:07, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> [cut]
>> > The fact that GNU chose the name "Iceweasel" for their own fork
> of Firefox
>> > is extremely unfortunate :-(
>>
>> Why it is unfortunate?
>
> Because they'll want Debi
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
> >> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
> >> and there may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
Tim Olsen wrote:
> The latest source for mail-notification has a version number of
> 3.0.dfsg.1-7
>
> However, the latest i386 binary for mail-notification has a version
> number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7+b1
>
> What does the extra +b1 mean? How do I
I've reviewed the copyright file for the 66 bugs that I reported,
manually, and I also inspected at least one claimed non-free file in
each package. I should have done this from the start, but I felt
(over-)confident that there wouldn't be false positives.
I found one file that likely is a false
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:11:13 -0400, Tim Olsen wrote:
> The latest source for mail-notification has a version number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7
>
> However, the latest i386 binary for mail-notification has a version
> number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7+b1
>
> What does the extra +b1 mean? How do I recreate the i386 bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: acovea-gtk
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.coyotegulch.com/products/acovea/acovea-gtk.html
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++,
The latest source for mail-notification has a version number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7
However, the latest i386 binary for mail-notification has a version
number of 3.0.dfsg.1-7+b1
What does the extra +b1 mean? How do I recreate the i386 build of
mail-notification?
thanks,
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
"Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:43:51 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> I think there will be a serious attempt at collaborating with the
>> Gnuzilla folks to try to resolve this confusion. Meanwhile, we're
>> trying to get the existing Firefox into Debian as free sof
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.16.1740 +0200]:
> > This script, along with symlinks from halt and reboot, lives in
> > /usr/local/sbin on all my systems
>
> Replacing halt might be a bit risky, as the story in
> http://bugs.debian.org/354163> document. :)
I would not
Le lundi 16 octobre 2006 15:26, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > PS: Can't we just rename it '93r8d9yad4l260ud.lite'? It's easier to
> > remember!
>
> I prefer d6a5c9544eca9b5ce2266d1c34a93222, or possibly
> acb943ac7d07d80a71fa271962df81e944bae3b7.
Git hater ? :-)
--
Jérôme Mar
[martin f kraft]
> This script, along with symlinks from halt and reboot, lives in
> /usr/local/sbin on all my systems
Replacing halt might be a bit risky, as the story in
http://bugs.debian.org/354163> document. :)
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Simon Josefsson]
>> Do you have suggestions to improve the situation?
>
> I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for
> the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess
> about the existence of a serio
Hi all,
I am sure you've all once typed 'halt' only to notice that
you were in an active SSH session and the machine on the other side
of $BIG_DISTANCE obediently followed your request. I've done it way
too much, so I ended up hacking up
http://svn.madduck.net/pub/sbin/base/shutdown
This scrip
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> PS: Can't we just rename it '93r8d9yad4l260ud.lite'? It's easier to remember!
I prefer d6a5c9544eca9b5ce2266d1c34a93222, or possibly
acb943ac7d07d80a71fa271962df81e944bae3b7.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Simon Josefsson]
> Do you have suggestions to improve the situation?
I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for
the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess
about the existence of a serious bug is not acceptable.
How many bugs did you file? A
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
>> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
>> and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your
>> package, I'm sorry for the noise.
>
> Sorry, but that is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ksniffer
Version : 0.2~alpha1
Upstream Author : Name giovanni (at) ksniffer.org
* URL : http://www.ksniffer.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> not others (like gnome) should not be allowed. If the port decides
> that they don't need any X, e.g. there is no hardware capable of
> running X applications, then they could remove all X stuff as a
> whole. That would be diff
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:13:53AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/15/06 00:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [snip]
>
* Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]:
> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
> and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your
> package, I'm sorry for the noise.
Sorry, but that is unacceptable behaviour.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http:/
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:35:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Failing that, we can either remove lilypond 2.6 from etch, or not. I
> am happy to do what other people judge to be best, since nobody is
> generally happy with my own decisions here.
I would think it would be an _extremely_ b
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:48 pm, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> If you are interested you should also adopt libmal. It causes a problem
> on kpilot and I offered the package to the kpilot maintainer without an
> answer from him. See #389353.
>
> If no one adopt it I will request the removal of malsyn
Lech Karol Paw³aszek wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 00:07, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
[cut]
> > The fact that GNU chose the name "Iceweasel" for their own fork
of Firefox
> > is extremely unfortunate :-(
>
> Why it is unfortunate?
Because they'll want Debian to call it 'Gnu-Iceweasel' and they'l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/06 22:01, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: teamspeak-client
> Version : 2.0.32
> Upstream Author : TeamSpeak Systems <[E
Hi,
does anyone have information on the whereabouts of Chris Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the maintainer of php-date?
I'm trying to get the package updated because it's severely outdated, but I
haven't received any responses on either bug reports or private e-mail.
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:43:51 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It is unfortunate because of the user confusion that it will
>> cause. IMO, the firefox package should not be renamed to iceweasel.
>
> If it's not renamed, we can't legally ship it. What, IYO,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:27:32AM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> El lunes, 16 de octubre de 2006 a las 00:22:53 +0200, Lech Karol Paw?aszek
> escribía:
>
> > > The fact that GNU chose the name "Iceweasel" for their own fork of
> > > Firefox
> > > is extremely unfortunate :-
El lunes, 16 de octubre de 2006 a las 09:27:32 +0200, Jacobo Tarrio escribía:
> Plus, one could say that as someone in Debian came up with the name, then we
> have priority over it.
> Hey, we can register it as a trade mark!
Before anyone gets the bright idea of getting all worked up about this
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> El lunes, 16 de octubre de 2006 a las 00:22:53 +0200, Lech Karol Paw?aszek
> escribía:
> > > The fact that GNU chose the name "Iceweasel" for their own fork of
> > > Firefox
> > > is extremely unfortunate :-(
> > Why it is unfortunate? Mozilla Corporat
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is unfortunate because of the user confusion that it will
> > cause. IMO, the firefox package should not be renamed to
> > iceweasel.
>
> If it's not renamed, we can't legally ship it.
... "we can't ship it
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * sean finney
>>
>> | is this even remotely acceptable? i had the impressions that packages
>> | must not assume the inner workings of dpkg. but, i can't back this up
>> | with anything in policy
El lunes, 16 de octubre de 2006 a las 00:22:53 +0200, Lech Karol Paw?aszek
escribía:
> > The fact that GNU chose the name "Iceweasel" for their own fork of Firefox
> > is extremely unfortunate :-(
> Why it is unfortunate? Mozilla Corporation doesn't want (Debian) to use
> firefox name without t
51 matches
Mail list logo
