On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:43:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> upstart is looking interesting and it might just as well replace
> sysvinit for etch+1. Or at least be an alternative.
> In order to enable this change, we're facing the "To continue type
> in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'" proble
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: torrus-cisco-cbqos-plugin
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Stanislav Sinyagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.torrus.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
De
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 49a98df6-2bd4-40c8-a559-7e15212dbd26
> [ ] Choice 1: Recall the project leader
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
Ganesan Rajagopal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> c2d43675-9efa-4809-a4aa-af042b62786e
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Special exception to DFSG2 for firmware as long as req
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asio
Version : 0.3.7
Upstream Author : Christopher M. Kohlhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://asio.sf.net/
* License : The Boost License (http://www.boost.org/LICENSE
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:44:09AM +0200, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Shaders are small programs which run on the GPU during the rendering
> process. They can be used to implement anything from some special lighting
> model to raytracing or Voronoi diagram display.
Voronoi diagrams are sort of a bad exa
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qshaderedit -- shader editor
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Ignacio Castaño, Karl Robillard and Lars Uebernickel
* URL or Web page : http://castano.ludicon.com/page.php?page_id=118
* Li
Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> a65763d3-b1e2-4530-8ff8-aa5915274eb4
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other projects
>
This one time, at band camp, Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:39:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:34:35PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of this slightly obscure service called email. It might
> > > possibly be affected by suc
On (06/10/06 17:35), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
> policy, at least in permissive mode. Everything seems to work for
> me; I can fire up targeted SELinux UML's and only see a few harmless
> log messages.
>
Hi,
I am inte
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: aspell-ar-large
Version : 1.2-0
Upstream Author : Ethan Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gokalp Yapici <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL :
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/ar/aspell6-ar-
On 10/6/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not true. Mplayer is the only one with proper support for ASS subtitles.
It is also the only one that plays dvd's without halting halfway (and
in the case of xine, telling me there is a codec problem). Luckily
Ubuntu has had player in
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 02:39:03PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> Well, I'm surprised to say the least. I have some virtual domains on a
> server. So I did `mail "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"@the.real.host` and sent a
> test message. Surprisingly, to me anyway, I got this on the local host:
>
> Oc
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If people think finger and sharutils are not important enough anymore to
> still be standard, we can still fix that.
I think finger at least should be downgraded to optional at this point.
How many people still run a finger server? Stanford has one, I
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 08:05:55PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
> i know of servers which create system accounts for email users (pop3
> and imap) with the complete email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as username.
>
> so especially for email addresses, the @ in system accounts might be
> interestin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>On 10/7/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any potential breakage to allow adduser --force-badname to
>> create accounts with @ in user names?
>
>The only thing that immediately comes to mind is that of a MTA that
>has to deliver mail fo
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:35:32PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> As per policy, I am raising a balloon about ths issue; I think
> if we ship vacation, finger, and sharutils, we can also ship
> mandatory acess controls in the standard distribution :)
This would make me very happy! :)
On 07/10/2006 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in #389160, the bug submitter suggests allowing @ in user names, which
> > adduser currently does not even allow when called with
> > --force-badname.
> >
> > Is there any potenti
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:39:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:34:35PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I'm thinking of this slightly obscure service called email. It might
> > possibly be affected by such brain damage. Why can't the bug submitter
> > make to with
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:34:35PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I'm thinking of this slightly obscure service called email. It might
> possibly be affected by such brain damage. Why can't the bug submitter
> make to with +, ., and other such characters?
According to my very brief examinati
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in #389160, the bug submitter suggests allowing @ in user names, which
> adduser currently does not even allow when called with
> --force-badname.
>
> Is there any potential breakage to allow adduser --force-badname to
> create
On 10/7/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any potential breakage to allow adduser --force-badname to
create accounts with @ in user names?
The only thing that immediately comes to mind is that of a MTA that
has to deliver mail for this user. For example, when cron runs a job
Hi,
in #389160, the bug submitter suggests allowing @ in user names, which
adduser currently does not even allow when called with
--force-badname.
Is there any potential breakage to allow adduser --force-badname to
create accounts with @ in user names?
Greetings
Marc
--
---
Hi martin,
hi fellow DDs!
I really support the idea martin is proposing but I want to see it in a
broader scope, not restricted to upstart alone (although I'm very
interested in upstart). Currently our support for alternative init
systems (like upstart, minit, runit, initng, to name a few) sucks r
Hi,
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 16:12, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > 2007 join as support team to Debconf
> > 2008 propose Japan as Debconf candidate
> > 2009 hold Debconf in Japan.
>
> This timeline won't work :-) At least the debconf-team hopes so:
>
> From 2007 we want to decide the venue two y
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:33:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 01:04:50 +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Oct 07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The size of the .debs for targeted policy is 2185702 Bytes, and
> >> adds seven packages
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:18:32PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
>
> xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
> controls where the original -26 source liv
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:29:43 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Supported by shadow maintainers. If you think they're needed,
>> they'll be here (I doubt it would be hard to convince release
>> managers to make a freeze exception
Manoj wrote:
>
>As per policy, I am raising a balloon about ths issue; I think
> if we ship vacation, finger, and sharutils, we can also ship
> mandatory acess controls in the standard distribution :)
Sounds like a good plan to me...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
Hi,
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061007 00:41]:
> I brought this over on the debian-installer mailing list, and
> suggested that we ship SELinux installed, but turned off by default;
> and a README or a short shell script fr the local administrator to
> enable SELinux. Our s
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Supported by shadow maintainers. If you think they're needed, they'll
> be here (I doubt it would be hard to convince release managers to make
> a freeze exception for this).
I was of course meaning "if you think that changes to what's already
the
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:27:50PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> It is easier to turn on something that is already installed;
Full ACK. We want to make it as easy as possible for Debian users to
profit from the added security features they gain from SELinux. IMHO.
> we can add c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 360643 wishlist
Bug#360643: APT configure flags
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> reassign 360643 dpkg-dev
Bug#360643: APT configure flags
Bug reassigned from packa
Re: Raúl Sánchez Siles 2006-10-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't think this bug could only be considered as a minor bug, since it
> prevented me to enter into kde and once you are used to apps inside a
> graphical environmnet it's quite difficult to find a solution yourself.
Do you have an idea w
Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:51:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "dependency" used backwards
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 253359 cyrus21-common
Bug#253359: general: Possible problems when setting of Cyrus-Imap
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `cyrus21-common'.
>
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:51:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "dependency" used backwards
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Hi,
On Thursday 05 October 2006 16:12, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 2007 join as support team to Debconf
> 2008 propose Japan as Debconf candidate
> 2009 hold Debconf in Japan.
This timeline won't work :-) At least the debconf-team hopes so:
From 2007 we want to decide the venue two years in advance,
El sáb, 07-10-2006 a las 01:04 +0200, Marco d'Itri escribió:
> On Oct 07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The size of the .debs for targeted policy is 2185702 Bytes,
> > and adds seven packages to the standard install. No special
> While I like much the idea of having s
> Personally, *I* think that still fails the DFSG, as you can't convey
> the right to distribute, but what do I know?
Definitely this failes the DFSG. These packages will probably never enter
Debian again, but at least _we_ (at d-u.o) are explicitely _allowed_ to
redistribute them.
> Wow... yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/06 18:56, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Samstag 07 Oktober 2006 00:35 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
[snip]
> Well, most users have enough to find out what groups they must be in for
> fully
> working desktop (>= 8). How many will use _any_ SELinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/06 22:18, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:10AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Would you mind sharing the -39 or deb-src with us?
>
> xv isn't distributable by me as I'm not the copyright holder. Whoever
> controls where the
42 matches
Mail list logo
