On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:29:43 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Supported by shadow maintainers. If you think they're needed,
>> they'll be here (I doubt it would be hard to convince release
>> managers to make a freeze exception for this).
> I was of course meaning "if you think that changes to what's already
> there are needed blah blah". The current default /etc/pam.d/login
> contains:
# SELinux needs to intervene at login time to ensure that the process
# starts in the proper default security context.
# Uncomment the following line to enable SELinux
# session required pam_selinux.so multiple
Oh, that's perfect. Thanks (should pay more attention to dpkg
asking me if I want to replace conffiles)
manoj
--
Nothing increases your golf score like witnesses.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
