> > Please tell me what's wrong with *current* package and what can we do to
> IIRC, one of the things that lead to the rejection of the mplayer
> package last time:
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2006-July/044840.html
This has been fixed in both upstream (svn of mplayer), a
Sorry for taking so long to reply.
We are sorry to inform you that our product is still not in stores.
Currently we are only offering it on our product website and plan on having it
in stores come November 2006.
As mentioned Dr. Weiss is still recommending a 4 month supply for best results.
If y
Hi,
This mail is to hopefully notify all the affected parties on a plan to
move apt-listbugs server infrastructure to merkel.debian.org, then to
bugs.debian.org.
The transition plan is as follows:
1. Move over to merkel.debian.org for the time being, with the upload
of apt-listbugs 0.0.53
2.
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I'm now waiting for the following two things to happen.
>
> 1. Ack on using bugs.donarmstrong.com for the time being for apt-listbugs.
If it's possible to wait a bit, you can specify b.d.o, and I'll put in
an HTTP redirect to send it to the appropriate
Am Freitag 22 September 2006 19:54 schrieb Martin Kittel:
> So this brings me back to me original problem: are user-space
> applications allowed/supposed to use these headers? And if so, how are
> they to be used if the headers rely on __KERNEL__ to be defined?
Did you try to comment out those inc
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:37:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > URI's accept parameters:
> > http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/archive-2003;gpg-keyid=0x40612c84/dists--debian--0/flex/flex-2.5.31.config
>
> > (again, this is a for instance).
>
> That sounds good. Would thi
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:40:54 +1000, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 04:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> URL's are not what would be needed.
>>
>> The information that is required could possibly be couched like so
>> (RFC 2822 field folding) (for flex in stabl
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Without the description, I would have guessed that -uk refers to the
>> United Kingdom.
>
> % apt-cache search -- -uk
Oh well, where did that brown paper bag of mine go?
Cheers,
-Hilko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/06 14:14, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> 24 ??? 2006 ? 14:00 -0500 Ron Johnson ???(-??):
>> Based on ISO_3166, it appears that Ukranian i18n files should either
>> be -ua or -ukr, but not -uk.
> Did you read ISO 3166-1? "ISO 3166-1, as
24 вересня 2006 о 14:00 -0500 Ron Johnson написав(-ла):
> Based on ISO_3166, it appears that Ukranian i18n files should either
> be -ua or -ukr, but not -uk.
Did you read ISO 3166-1? "ISO 3166-1, as part of the ISO 3166 standard, provides
codes for the names of countries and dependent areas."
"Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/06 13:39, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> 24 ??? 2006 ? 20:10 +0200 Hilko Bengen ???(-??):
>> doc-debian-ua might be a better choice of name.
> No, that package contains documments in Ukrainian language, not
> documments to be used in U
24 вересня 2006 о 20:10 +0200 Hilko Bengen написав(-ла):
> doc-debian-ua might be a better choice of name.
No, that package contains documments in Ukrainian language, not
documments to be used in Ukraine. And it is not first time, search
archives for ispell-uk or mozilla-firefox-locale-uk (or thund
> doc-debian-ua might be a better choice of name.
I'm afraid that definitely not
>
> Without the description, I would have guessed that -uk refers to the
> United Kingdom.
Well, there are certainly many people who would think so, but that
just means that there are many people who know litt
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:10:00PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Yanovych Borys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Yanovych Borys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: doc-debian-uk
> > Version : initial release of native Debian
Yanovych Borys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Yanovych Borys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: doc-debian-uk
> Version : initial release of native Debian package
> * URL : http://cvs.debian.org/
> Description : Debi
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:05:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 05:40:42PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > So what you seem to say is: If you copy the libc6 or static libraries
> > between distributions you deserve to fail. Thats fine if you say it
> > straight o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: chillispot
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jens Jakobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.chillispot.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Wir
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:24:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libasound.so.2" is not at the
> expected address
>
> warning: difference appears
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 the mental interface of
Kurt Roeckx told:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > > # libtool --version
> > > > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18
> > > > 22:14:06)
> > >
> > > That's what you have insta
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > # libtool --version
> > > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 Debian 1.5.22-4 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18
> > > 22:14:06)
> >
> > That's what you have installed in /usr/bin, try:
> > ./ld10k1/libtool --version
>
> ltmain.sh (GNU l
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 the mental interface of
Kurt Roeckx told:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 the mental interface of
> > Kurt Roeckx told:
> > >
> > > The current version in Debian unstable has:
> > > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1
On Sep 23, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As long as the source is available in the package this is not a bug at
> > all.
> - even if the build infrastructure is missing how to build the
>manpages, it's no bug?
If they can be manually built only using software in Debian then it
Marco d'Itri writes:
> On Sep 21, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - the man pages (all except gfortran.1) are not built from
> >source. -> RC
> As long as the source is available in the package this is not a bug at
> all.
great news! two more questions:
- even if the build
Hi all,
the new "~" in packagenames and builddirs doesn' fit well.
The problem is caused by the fact that there is a "~" in the
directory name. Libtool uses "~" as a separator. [1]
Is there a way to avoid this or should we use the "old" packagenames
-> alsa-tools-1.0.12+1.0.13rc2 instead of alsa
* Joey Hess:
> To make a Vcs-Svn field work, dpkg-dev needs to be modified to recognise
> that field. A simple modification but it would need to be done for all
> the other ones for other RCSes, which could be a problem since there are
> more and more of them. If we wanted to use a formalised fiel
Several people have mentioned this thread on planet, but I think it
merits mention here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg01922.html
There are a lot of people on -user that are saying some very nice
things about Debian and its developers.
For any of you that are reading this: thank
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:30:36PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I'm guessing translations. They eat up space really fast.
> Is there a way to compare packages after localepurge runs?
I would bet on translations and documentation. Maybe it could be possible
to automate that analysis and see wh
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 04:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> URL's are not what would be needed.
>
> The information that is required could possibly be couched
> like so (RFC 2822 field folding) (for flex in stable)
> ,
> | XS-VCS-ARCH-Repo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | http:
28 matches
Mail list logo
