On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 06:25:26PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > > Try running it in some iso-8859 locale.
> > That's not an acceptable answer, given that almost all locales for etch will
> > be Unicode by default. This makes the package unreleasable. Of course, the
> > package seems to only
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:50:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Starting with version 2.5.31-18 of flex we have started
> providing a static library compiled with position independent code,
> namely, libfl_pic.a, in addition to the normal libfl.a library. This
> is my mail, in acc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwww-opensearch-perl
Version : 0.06_02 (changed to 0.06.02 for Debian)
Upstream Author : Brian Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
htt
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:50:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Starting with version 2.5.31-18 of flex we have started
> providing a static library compiled with position independent code,
> namely, libfl_pic.a, in addition to the normal libfl.a library. This
> is my mail,
Maybe if you boot using live cd and after that mount your partition and
edit /sbin/init
and change dev/console for /dev/console.
Ozgur Karatas escreveu:
Hello,
We buy a IBM Blade Server. I choose 2.6 kernel and Grub on Debian 3.1 Sarge
Setup. But Debian says me Kernel Panic
pivot_root: No such
Hallo Wouter,
if you replay plz CC me.
* Wouter Verhelst schrieb [06-09-06 20:26]:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Udo Mueller wrote:
> > fsck.ext3 runs without any error message.
>
> Did you do "fsck -f", or just "fsck"? In case you did the latter, please
> run it with -f again.
I
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Who decided that we should just drop them all? After all generating a
> non-UTF locale and setting an environment variable isn't a very
> difficult workaround? I mean, when has lack of UTF support become an
> RC-bug? Charset support is not even mentioned in the policy, other
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't matter for ekg2, which will stay in experimental for quite a
> while I'm afraid, but it is important for at least two other of my
> packages (which are in etch) which don't support UTF-8 at all. And I'm
> reasonably sure they are not the only
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: Gnome Subtitles
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Pedro Castro <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gsubtitles.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang:
Hello,
I would like to experiment with a little new plan for having tags flow
again from the web submissions[1] to the Packages file.
Currently the flow happens by hand, with yours truly checking every
single submissions and approving it or rejecting it. This doesn't work,
it's long, boring, err
ncies in the debian boot. The current state of affairs
> in my sid chroot look like this:
>
> http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png
[SNIP]
>
> If you want to make a graph using the dependency information provided
> in the insserv package for the scripts
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 02:46:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 386299 serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 06:14:55PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>
> > Unicode support in ekg2 is highly experimental and not yet supported
> > upstream, therefore the debian package is built wit
(off list)
I thought to discuss it first (maybe the key people would
claim it is not a bug, so a bug report would be a waste of time,
more or less).
I will file a bug in a day or two, depending on other mail replies.
If you think that is unneccessary and I should file a bug immediately,
plese sa
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-07 17:11]:
> On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > > as depending on udev actually do.
> >
retitle 386358 ITA: elserv -- HTTP server that runs on Emacsen
Hi,
> I request an adopter for this package. I've lost interest in this
> package and nothing in Debian uses it apparently. If you'd like to
> see it survive, please take it.
You're joking, right?
Reverse Depends:
wysihtml-el,
Am Donnerstag 07 September 2006 14:14 schrieb David Balazic:
> The issue is, that this extended partition has the size of the logical
> partition and not the maximum possible size (the entire empty disk space
> plus the logical parition).
>
> This layout seems to be special to debian, since all oth
Hello,
We buy a IBM Blade Server. I choose 2.6 kernel and Grub on Debian 3.1 Sarge
Setup. But Debian says me Kernel Panic
pivot_root: No such file or directory
/sbin/init : 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
Kernel panic : Attempted to kill init
How to pass it?
--
,''`. Ozgur Karat
This one time, at band camp, Josselin Mouette said:
> Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 à 15:18 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> >
> > I can't think of a single one that would not work with good old static
> > dev tough udev might be the recommended way.
>
> But nevertheless, they won't work if udev
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 à 15:18 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> > > http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
>
> I can'
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.07.1659 +0200]:
>> Somehow on --reinstall apt does not break cycles.
>
> Where is there a cycle?
You are right. There isn't even a cycle. Just a simple depends. That
makes it even worse.
M
h
> > scripts have this information present to make a useful graph of the
> > dependencies in the debian boot. The current state of affairs in my
> > sid chroot look like this:
> >
> > http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
> N
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.07.1659 +0200]:
> Somehow on --reinstall apt does not break cycles.
Where is there a cycle?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian develo
On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
> None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those
On Sep 07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
> > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> > as depending on udev actually do.
> your point beeing ?
That if y
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is somewhat unexpected, given that both packages are already
> installed and configured. Does anyone know what's up?
>
> lapse:~# apt-get install --reinstall {core,debian}utils
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> 0
Hello David,
On Thursday 07 September 2006 14:14, David Balazic wrote:
> I noticed, that when the debian installer is instructed to create
> two partitions, whose joint size is less than the size of the disk,
> then it creates one primary partition and one logical partition inside
> an extended pa
Hi!
(please CC me on replies, as I am not subscribed to the list; but will
check its archives every now and then)
I noticed, that when the debian installer is instructed to create
two partitions, whose joint size is less than the size of the disk,
then it creates one primary partition and one log
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> as depending on udev actually do.
None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those
scripts, so listing it as such is wrong.
--
Home is where
gh scripts have this information present to make a useful graph
> > of the dependencies in the debian boot. The current state of
> > affairs in my sid chroot look like this:
> >
> >> http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
>
> Now, try think
ependencies in the debian boot. The current state of affairs in my
> sid chroot look like this:
>
> http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
as depending on udev actually do.
--
ciao,
Marco
sign
this:
http://user.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian/lsb-info-20060907.png >
The scripts listed in the upper right corner are all those scripts
without dependency information available. This is the complete list
for my installation:
hwclockfirst.sh ifupdown-clean modutils hwclock.sh libdevmapper1
This is somewhat unexpected, given that both packages are already
installed and configured. Does anyone know what's up?
lapse:~# apt-get install --reinstall {core,debian}utils
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 reinstalled, 0 to remove a
Am 2006-09-01 13:53:06, schrieb Michael S. Peek:
> system. In this command line, I specify that I want the lpr package
> removed, and the cupsys-bsd package installed (the two are mutually
> exclusive -- lpr conflicts w/ cupsys-bsd). Now, you would think that
> >aptitude -y -o Aptitude::Log=
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>> > So I tried to get a new passwd
>> > following the instruction of http://db.debian.org/password.html
>> > at about 12am JST (3am UTC) but I've gotten nothing yet (after
>> > one day already).
>>
>> Does th
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:07:39 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Are you sure that the GPG key is still in the Debian keyring?
I believe so.
> And on the web page you mentionned, it's written that you should contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in case of problem...
Right. Thanks again.
Regards,
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > So I tried to get a new passwd
> > following the instruction of http://db.debian.org/password.html
> > at about 12am JST (3am UTC) but I've gotten nothing yet (after
> > one day already).
>
> Does the procedure
>
> echo "Please change my Debian passw
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:28:34 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> svn.debian.org account database is separate from the usual Debian
> developers account. It is hooked into Alioth's account database.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth
> http://wiki.debian.org/AliothFAQ
>
> Thus the password is different
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> yesterday, I failed to login svn.debian.org with ssh.
> I was asked Passwd and input the correct passwd (as far
> as I remembered) three times but failed.
>
> I was given my first passwd in 2001/01 and it was changed
> in 2003/12/16 (p
Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:30:19PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> This may be a good time to remind maintainers that often a versioned
>> conflict may be more appropriate than a versioned dependency.
>
> This seems natural to me, but the policy contains this discou
39 matches
Mail list logo
